A Study Evaluating Vardenafil Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Erectile Dysfunction (ED) and Dyslipidemia

Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00379756
Collaborator
(none)
395
65
2
11.8
6.1
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a study consisting of four periods (screening, run-in, treatment, follow-up). A four-week treatment-free, run-in period where the subject will make at least four attempts at intercourse on four separate days with at least 50% of the attempts must be unsuccessful. During run-in the subjects will be using a stopwatch to measure the time from erection perceived hard enough for penetration until withdrawal from the partner's vagina. Next there are 12 weeks of treatment with either placebo or LEVITRA. Each subject will be required to visit the clinic on 5 occasions over a period of 4 months.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: LEVITRA (vardenafil)
  • Drug: placebo
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
395 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Duration of Erection of Flexible-dose Vardenafil Administered for 12 Weeks Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Erectile Dysfunction and Dyslipidemia
Actual Study Start Date :
May 22, 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 17, 2007
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 17, 2007

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Levitra

10mg x 4 weeks, with option to increase to 20mg aat that time if desired

Drug: LEVITRA (vardenafil)
active comparator

Placebo Comparator: placebo

Drug: placebo
placebo comparator

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) [Up to Week 12]

    The IIEF questionnaire is a validated 15-item instrument that assesses the participant's erectile function over the previous 4 weeks. The IIEF includes 5 domains affecting male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction. Responses to the IIEF were re-coded using a standard coding method, where more positive responses received a higher score. The EF domain score was calculated as the sum of the re-coded scores from questions 1-5 and 15, using last observation carried forward (LOCF). Scores range from 1 (lowest) to 30 (highest). If two or more items in the EF domain were missing, the EF domain score was considered to be missing.

  2. Mean success rate of insertion based on attempts [Up to Week 12]

    Success rate of insertion was derived from the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 2 (SEP-2) of the participant's diary that asked 'Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?'. Responses were either Yes or No. Patients were instructed to complete diary questions as soon as possible after each sexual attempt, but no later than 24 hours after the attempt. The per-participant overall success rate for insertion was calculated by dividing the number of successful attempts (SEP-2=yes) over 12 weeks by the total number of valid attempts recorded over 12 weeks. If the participant was not able to make any valid attempts in 12 weeks, the participant was non-evaluable. Per-participant success rates were then averaged at the group level to obtain the mean success rate from Weeks 0-12.

  3. Mean success rates of maintenance based on attempts [Up to Week 12]

    Success rate of maintenance was derived from the SEP Question 3 (SEP-3) of the participant's diary that asked 'Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?'. Responses were either Yes or No. Participants were instructed to complete diary questions as soon as possible after each sexual attempt, but no later than 24 hours after the attempt. The per-participant overall success rate for maintenance was calculated by dividing the number of successful attempts (SEP-3=yes) over 12 weeks by the total number of valid attempts recorded over 12 weeks. If the participant was not able to make any valid attempts in 12 weeks, the participant was non-evaluable. Per-participant success rates were then averaged at the group level to obtain the mean success rate from Weeks 0-12.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Mean duration of erection leading to completion of successful intercourse as measured by Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 [SEP-3] [Up to Week 12]

    Duration of erection leading to completion of successful intercourse was derived from data recorded in the participant's diary. For each diary entry, the time from erection perceived hard enough for penetration until withdrawal from partner's vagina was measured by stopwatch and recorded in the participant's diary. For diary entries where SEP-3=yes, this recorded duration was used in calculations of a per-participant median duration. For diary entries where SEP-3=no, a duration of 0 was used to calculate the per-participant median. The per-participant median values averaged at the group level to obtain the mean duration of erection leading to completion of successful intercourse as measured by SEP-3.

  2. Change from Baseline in scores for questions on the IIEF questionnaire and scores of the other non-EF domains of the IIEF [Up to Week 12]

    Non-EF domains of the IIEF (Intercourse Satisfaction, Orgasmic Function, Sexual Desire, Overall Satisfaction) and IIEF questions (Erection during sexual activity?, Hard enough for penetration?, Able to penetrate partner?, Maintain your erection?, Maintain to completion?, Times attempted intercourse, Satisfactory for you?, Enjoyed sexual intercourse?, How often did you ejaculate?, How often feeling of orgasm?, How often felt sexual desire?, Rate level of sexual desire?, How satisfied with sex life?, Satisfied with sexual relationship? and Confidence to get, keep erection?) scores were assessed at Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12. The Baseline was the value at Week 0. Change from Baseline was the post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

  3. Number of participants with normal erectile function having EF domain scores of 26 and above [Up to Week 12]

    The EF domain score was calculated by summing recoded responses to Questions 1-5 and 15, for each participant. It ranged from 1 to 30. EF domain scores were dichotomized as either normal (26 and above) or below normal (below 26) using LOCF, to calculate number of participants returning to normal erectile function. For the EF domain score the total was considered to be missing if 2 or more answers in the domain were missing.

  4. Change from Baseline in participant's diary results [Up to Week 12]

    Electronic diaries were provided to participants. Participants were supposed to complete the diary questions as soon as possible after each sexual attempt but no later than 24 hours after the attempts. The diary questions (Ability to achieve at least some erection, Ability to insert penis into partner's vagina, Long enough erection having successful intercourse, Satisfied with the hardness of erection, Satisfied with this sexual experience, Ability to ejaculate) response rates were presented for Weeks 0-12. The Baseline was the value at Week 0. Change from Baseline was the post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

  5. Mean duration of erection regardless of SEP-3 Response [Up to Week 12]

    Duration of erection was time from erection perceived hard enough for penetration (start stopwatch) until withdrawal from the partner's vagina (stop stopwatch) regardless of completion of successful intercourse. The data was presented for overall period from Week 0 to Week 12.

  6. Change from Baseline in duration of erection leading to completion of successful intercourse. [Up to Week 12]

    Duration of erection was time from erection perceived hard enough for penetration (start stopwatch) until withdrawal from the partner's vagina (stop stopwatch) leading to completion of successful intercourse. The data was presented for overall period from Week 0 to Week 12. The Baseline was the value at Week 0. Change from Baseline was the post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

  7. Number of participants with response 'Yes' for Global Assessment Question [Up to Week 12]

    The participants were asked to complete the self-administered Global Assessment Question. The question asked was 'has the treatment you have been taking over the past 4 weeks improved your erections'. The response was either Yes or No depending on comparison to participant's erections before their participation in this study. For the scale missing values remained missing.

  8. Mean score for Keep It Simple (KIS) scale [Up to Week 12]

    The KIS scale was a self-reported visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 designed to assess erections as 'how do you grade your erections over the last 4 weeks?'. For the scale missing values remained as missing.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion criteria:
  • Males with ED for more than six months, according to the NIH Consensus Statement (inability to attain and/or maintain penile erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance).

  • Stable heterosexual relationship for more than 6 months.

  • The subject must make at least four attempts at sexual intercourse (according to the question in the subject diary: Was sexual activity initiated with the intention of intercourse?) on four separate days during the untreated baseline period. At least 50% of attempts during this period must be unsuccessful, according to the following questions from the subject diary [at least one question should be answered "No"]: Were you able to achieve at least some erection (some enlargement of the penis)? Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina? Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?

  • Diagnosis of dyslipidemia treated with a stable dose of a statin for 6 months at Visit

  • IIEF-EF domain score of 25 denoting mild to severe ED at Visit 2.

  • Documented, dated, written Informed Consent.

Exclusion criteria:
  • Premature ejaculator <2 minutes

  • Any unstable medical, psychiatric, spinal cord injury, penile anatomical abnormalities, or substance abuse disorder that MD feels subject will not be able to complete the study.

  • Low sexual desire.

  • Prior prostatectomy surgery

  • Severe chronic or acute liver disease, history of moderate or severe liver impairment

  • Clinically significant chronic hematological disease

  • Bleeding disorder or significant active peptic ulceration.

  • Cardiovascular conditions that prevent sexual activity.

  • History of heart attack, stroke, or life-threatening arrhythmia within the prior 6 months.

  • hypotension or hypertension at rest.

  • cancer within the past 5 years. Use of these medications: nitrates or nitric oxide donors, anti-androgens, oral or injectable androgens, received any investigational drug (including placebo) within 30 days of screening (Visit 1).

  • Use of any treatment for ED within 7 days of screening including oral medications, vacuum devices, constrictive devices, injections or urethral suppositories.

  • Subjects who are taking the following potent inhibitors of cytochrome P-450 3A4.

  • Abnormal Laboratory Values:

  1. serum total testosterone level >25% below the lower limit of normal

  2. serum creatinine >3.0 mg/dl.

  3. AST and/or ALT >3x the upper limit of normal.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 GSK Investigational Site Fairhope Alabama United States 36532
2 GSK Investigational Site Homewood Alabama United States 35209
3 GSK Investigational Site Huntsville Alabama United States 35801
4 GSK Investigational Site Phoenix Arizona United States 85016
5 GSK Investigational Site Phoenix Arizona United States 85023
6 GSK Investigational Site Concord California United States 94520
7 GSK Investigational Site Huntington Park California United States 90255
8 GSK Investigational Site Long Beach California United States 90806
9 GSK Investigational Site Modesto California United States 95350
10 GSK Investigational Site Newport Beach California United States 92660
11 GSK Investigational Site Orangevale California United States 95662
12 GSK Investigational Site Santa Ana California United States 92705
13 GSK Investigational Site Walnut Creek California United States 94598
14 GSK Investigational Site Denver Colorado United States 80210
15 GSK Investigational Site Wheat Ridge Colorado United States 80033
16 GSK Investigational Site New Britain Connecticut United States 06052
17 GSK Investigational Site Aventura Florida United States 33180
18 GSK Investigational Site Clearwater Florida United States 33761
19 GSK Investigational Site Coral Gables Florida United States 33134
20 GSK Investigational Site Fort Myers Florida United States 33916
21 GSK Investigational Site North Miami Florida United States 33161
22 GSK Investigational Site Orlando Florida United States 32803
23 GSK Investigational Site Pembroke Pines Florida United States 33024
24 GSK Investigational Site Pinecrest Florida United States 33156
25 GSK Investigational Site Saint Petersburg Florida United States 33710
26 GSK Investigational Site Sarasota Florida United States 34237
27 GSK Investigational Site South Miami Florida United States 33143
28 GSK Investigational Site Tampa Florida United States 33607
29 GSK Investigational Site West Palm Beach Florida United States 33401
30 GSK Investigational Site Atlanta Georgia United States 30342
31 GSK Investigational Site Columbus Georgia United States 31904
32 GSK Investigational Site Dawsonville Georgia United States 30534
33 GSK Investigational Site Roswell Georgia United States 30076
34 GSK Investigational Site Woodstock Georgia United States 30189
35 GSK Investigational Site Avon Indiana United States 46123
36 GSK Investigational Site Evansville Indiana United States 47714
37 GSK Investigational Site Fort Wayne Indiana United States 46825
38 GSK Investigational Site Jeffersonville Indiana United States 47130
39 GSK Investigational Site Wichita Kansas United States 67207
40 GSK Investigational Site Lexington Kentucky United States 40509
41 GSK Investigational Site Madisonville Kentucky United States 42431
42 GSK Investigational Site Shreveport Louisiana United States 71106
43 GSK Investigational Site Swansea Maine United States 02777
44 GSK Investigational Site Taunton Massachusetts United States 02780
45 GSK Investigational Site Kalamazoo Michigan United States 49009
46 GSK Investigational Site Saint Louis Park Minnesota United States 55416
47 GSK Investigational Site Saint Louis Missouri United States 63117
48 GSK Investigational Site Omaha Nebraska United States 68134
49 GSK Investigational Site Las Vegas Nevada United States 89119
50 GSK Investigational Site Lawrenceville New Jersey United States 08648
51 GSK Investigational Site New York New York United States 10016
52 GSK Investigational Site Rochester New York United States 14609
53 GSK Investigational Site West Seneca New York United States 14224
54 GSK Investigational Site Charlotte North Carolina United States 28262
55 GSK Investigational Site Fayetteville North Carolina United States 28304
56 GSK Investigational Site Winston-Salem North Carolina United States 27103
57 GSK Investigational Site Shippensburg Pennsylvania United States 17257
58 GSK Investigational Site Nashville Tennessee United States 37203
59 GSK Investigational Site Amarillo Texas United States 79106
60 GSK Investigational Site Salt Lake City Utah United States 84107
61 GSK Investigational Site Norfolk Virginia United States 23502
62 GSK Investigational Site Richmond Virginia United States 23294
63 GSK Investigational Site Seattle Washington United States 98166
64 GSK Investigational Site Menomonee Falls Wisconsin United States 53051
65 GSK Investigational Site Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53209

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • GlaxoSmithKline

Investigators

  • Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00379756
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 106718
First Posted:
Sep 22, 2006
Last Update Posted:
Aug 16, 2017
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2017
Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 16, 2017