Efficacy of TAK-438 Compared to AG-1749 (Lansoprazole) in the Maintenance Treatment of Healed Erosive Esophagitis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to confirm the efficacy of TAK-438, once daily (QD), compared to lansoprazole for the maintenance treatment of healed erosive esophagitis and to determine the clinical dose.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: TAK-438 10 mg QD
|
Drug: TAK-438
In the treatment period, the participants will receive treatment of TAK-438 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
In the maintenance treatment period, the participants will receive treatment of TAK-438 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and lansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
|
Experimental: TAK-438 20 mg QD
|
Drug: TAK-438
In the treatment period, the participants will receive treatment of TAK-438 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
In the maintenance treatment period, the participants will receive treatment of TAK-438 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and lansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
|
Active Comparator: Lansoprazole 15 mg QD
|
Drug: Lansoprazole
In the treatment period, the participants will receive treatment of TAK-438 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
In the maintenance treatment period, the participants will receive treatment of TAK-438 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and lansoprazole 15 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Endoscopically confirmed recurrence rate of erosive esophagitis after 24 weeks of maintenance treatment [24 Weeks.]
Endoscopic recurrence of erosive esophagitis is defined as those participants who have endoscopically confirmed EE of Grade A to D as defined by the Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grading System. The definitions of each grade are: Grade O (No mucosal break), Grade A (Mucosal break <5 mm), Grade B (Mucosal break ≥5 mm), Grade C (Mucosal break continuous between two or more folds and <75% of the circumference) and Grade D (Mucosal break ≥75% of the circumference).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Endoscopically confirmed recurrence rate of erosive esophagitis after 12 weeks of maintenance treatment [12 Weeks.]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
At Visit H-1 (start of the treatment period), the participants must have endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis of Grade A to D, as defined by the LA classification grading system, and the target number of participants who are clearly Grade C or D is 15% or more of the total participants.
-
Outpatients (including inpatient for examination)
-
Participants must have successfully completed the treatment period and have endoscopically healed EE at Week 2, 4, or 8 in the treatment period. Endoscopically healed EE is defined as those participants who have endoscopically confirmed EE of Grade O as defined by the LA classification grading system.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Participants with an esophagus-related complication (eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal varices, scleroderma, viral or fungal infection, esophageal stenosis, etc.), a history of radiotherapy or cryotherapy of the esophagus, a caustic or physiochemical trauma (esophageal sclerotherapy, etc.). However, participants with Schatzki's ring (mucosal tissue ring around inferior esophageal sphincter) or Barrett's esophagus are allowed to be included.
-
Participants who have received surgery or treatment affecting gastroesophageal reflux (cardioplasty, dilation of esophageal stenosis [excluding Schatzki's ring], etc.), or who have a history of surgery of stomach or duodenum (excluding removal of benign polyp under endoscopy)
-
Participants who have acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, gastric or duodenal ulcer (mucosal defect with white coating) within 30 days prior to Visit H-1 (initiation of study drug administration). However, participants with gastric or duodenal erosions are allowed to be included.
-
Participants with a previous or current history of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, or other gastric acid hypersecretion disorder
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kashiwa-shi | Chiba | Japan | ||
2 | Yachiyo-shi | Chiba | Japan | ||
3 | Saijo-shi | Ehime | Japan | ||
4 | Fukuoka-shi | Fukuoka | Japan | ||
5 | Kasuya-gun | Fukuoka | Japan | ||
6 | Koriyama-shi | Fukushima | Japan | ||
7 | Takayama-shi | Gifu | Japan | ||
8 | Annaka-shi | Gunma | Japan | ||
9 | Asahikawa-shi | Hokkaido | Japan | ||
10 | Sapporo-shi | Hokkaido | Japan | ||
11 | Itami-shi | Hyogo | Japan | ||
12 | Kobe-shi | Hyogo | Japan | ||
13 | Nishinomiya-shi | Hyogo | Japan | ||
14 | Fujisawa-shi | Kanagawa | Japan | ||
15 | Yokohama-shi | Kanagawa | Japan | ||
16 | Kochi-shi | Kochi | Japan | ||
17 | Kumamoto-shi | Kumamoto | Japan | ||
18 | Kyoto-shi | Kyoto | Japan | ||
19 | Sendai-shi | Miyagi | Japan | ||
20 | Nagasaki-shi | Nagasaki | Japan | ||
21 | Kishiwada-shi | Osaka | Japan | ||
22 | Osaka-shi | Osaka | Japan | ||
23 | Suita-shi | Osaka | Japan | ||
24 | Takatsuki-shi | Osaka | Japan | ||
25 | Saga-shi | Saga | Japan | ||
26 | Kumagaya-shi | Saitama | Japan | ||
27 | Saitama-shi | Saitama | Japan | ||
28 | Tokorozawa-shi | Saitama | Japan | ||
29 | Bunkyo-ku | Tokyo | Japan | ||
30 | Chuo-ku | Tokyo | Japan | ||
31 | Hachioji-shi | Tokyo | Japan | ||
32 | Kokubunji-shi | Tokyo | Japan | ||
33 | Shibuya-ku | Tokyo | Japan | ||
34 | Shinjuku-ku | Tokyo | Japan | ||
35 | Toshima-ku | Tokyo | Japan | ||
36 | Shimonoseki-shi | Yamaguchi | Japan | ||
37 | Tsuru-shi | Yamanashi | Japan |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Takeda
Investigators
- Study Director: Senior Manager, Takeda
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- TAK-438/CCT-003
- U1111-1125-1054
- JapicCTI-111662