Efficacy of TAK-438 Compared to AG-1749 (Lansoprazole) in the Treatment of Erosive Esophagitis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of TAK-438, once daily (QD), compared to lansoprazole in patients with erosive esophagitis of Grade A to D as defined by the LA classification grading system.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: TAK-438 20 mg QD
|
Drug: TAK-438
TAK-438 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Drug: Placebo
Lansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
For participants whose EE is not endoscopically healed at Week 8, the participants will receive additional treatment of TAK-438 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to an additional 8 weeks.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: AG-1749 30 mg QD
|
Drug: Lansoprazole
Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
For participants whose EE is not endoscopically healed at Week 8, the participants will receive additional treatment of TAK-438 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to an additional 8 weeks.
Other Names:
Drug: Placebo
TAK-438 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Endoscopic Healing Rate Over 8 Weeks of Erosive Esophagitis [8 Weeks]
Endoscopic healing of erosive esophagitis is defined as those participants who have endoscopically confirmed EE of Grade O as defined by the Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grading System. The definitions of each grade are: Grade O (No mucosal break), Grade A (Mucosal break <5 mm), Grade B (Mucosal break ≥5 mm), Grade C (Mucosal break continuous between two or more folds and <75% of the circumference) and Grade D (Mucosal break ≥75% of the circumference).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Endoscopic Healing Rate Over 2 Weeks of Erosive Esophagitis [2 Weeks]
- Endoscopic Healing Rate Over 4 Weeks of Erosive Esophagitis [4 Weeks]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
At Visit 1 (start of the observation period), the participant must have endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis of Grade A to D, as defined by the LA classification grading system, and the target number of participants who are clearly Grade C or D is 30% (120 participants) or more of the total participants.
-
Outpatient (including inpatient for examination)
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Participants with an esophagus-related complication (eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal varices, scleroderma, viral or fungal infection, esophageal stenosis, etc.), a history of radiotherapy or cryotherapy of the esophagus, a caustic or physiochemical trauma (esophageal sclerotherapy, etc.). However, participants with Schatzki's ring (mucosal tissue ring around inferior esophageal sphincter) or Barrett's esophagus are allowed to be included.
-
Participants who have received surgery or treatment affecting gastroesophageal reflux (cardioplasty, dilation of esophageal stenosis [excluding Schatzki's ring], etc.), or who have a history of surgery of stomach or duodenum (excluding removal of benign polyp under endoscopy)
-
Participants who have acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, gastric or duodenal ulcer (mucosal defect with white coating) within 30 days prior to Visit 1 (start of the observation period). However, participants with gastric or duodenal erosions are allowed to be included.
-
Participants with a previous or current history of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, or other gastric acid hypersecretion disorders
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nagoya-shi | Aichi | Japan | ||
2 | Abiko-shi | Chiba | Japan | ||
3 | Fukuoka-shi | Fukuoka | Japan | ||
4 | Itoshima-shi | Fukuoka | Japan | ||
5 | Kurume-shi | Fukuoka | Japan | ||
6 | Onga-gun | Fukuoka | Japan | ||
7 | Gifu-shi | Gifu | Japan | ||
8 | Annaka-shi | Gunma | Japan | ||
9 | Aki-gun | Hiroshima | Japan | ||
10 | Hiroshima-shi | Hiroshima | Japan | ||
11 | Sapporo-shi | Hokkaido | Japan | ||
12 | Amagasaki-shi | Hyogo | Japan | ||
13 | Kobe-shi | Hyogo | Japan | ||
14 | Takarazuka-shi | Hyogo | Japan | ||
15 | Sakade-shi | Kagawa | Japan | ||
16 | Yokohama-shi | Kanagawa | Japan | ||
17 | Kochi-shi | Kochi | Japan | ||
18 | Susaki-shi | Kochi | Japan | ||
19 | Kumamoto-shi | Kumamoto | Japan | ||
20 | Kyoto-shi | Kyoto | Japan | ||
21 | Nagasaki-shi | Nagasaki | Japan | ||
22 | Oita-shi | Oita | Japan | ||
23 | Okayama-shi | Okayama | Japan | ||
24 | Fuziidera-shi | Osaka | Japan | ||
25 | Shizuoka-shi | Shizuoka | Japan | ||
26 | Otawara-shi | Tochigi | Japan | ||
27 | Chiyoda-ku | Tokyo | Japan | ||
28 | Chuo-ku | Tokyo | Japan | ||
29 | Nakano-ku | Tokyo | Japan | ||
30 | Ota-ku | Tokyo | Japan | ||
31 | Setagaya-ku | Tokyo | Japan | ||
32 | Yamagata-shi | Yamagata | Japan |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Takeda
Investigators
- Study Director: Senior Manager, Takeda
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- TAK-438/CCT-002
- U1111-1123-8356
- JapicCTI-111607