APIL_2013: Trial on Delay Phenomenon Utility in Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After an Esophagectomy

Sponsor
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02432794
Collaborator
(none)
44
1
2
49
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a randomized clinical trial to clarify if the delay phenomenon could reduce the incidence of oesophagogastric dehiscence after an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer comparing an experimental group vs control group. The delay phenomenon will be performed by an arteriographic approach.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: delay phenomenon by arteriographic approach
N/A

Detailed Description

Subtotal esophagectomy with tubular gastroplasty to upper mediastinum and esophagogastric anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis procedure) is a very complex surgical technique. It is performed in patients with infracarinal esophageal carcinoma and is associated with a high morbidity rate in specialized centers (up to 60% in some groups). One of the most important postoperative complications is the oesophagogastric anastomotic leakage which leads to high morbidity (mediastinitis, respiratory failure, pleural effusion) and mortality rate (up to 60% depending on the reports).

The most important cause of anastomotic leakage is the stomach's extreme sensitivity to ischemic injury. There are several experimental studies that have demonstrated that the delay phenomenon before the esophageal resection surgery aims to improve blood perfusion after a period of time. Few studies, only case-reports, describe a decrease in the incidence of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage. May the delay phenomenon reduce the incidence of anastomotic intrathoracic leakage?. There aren't any prospective randomized controlled trials to answer this question.

For this reason the investigators propose to perform a prospective randomized controlled trial in patients who underwent a subtotal esophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis procedure), comparing two groups: one of them will be submitted to a delay phenomenon by arteriographic procedure before esophageal resection surgery, and the other one will be operated on directly, to demonstrate if the delay phenomenon can reduce the incidence of anastomotic esophagogastric leakage.

We decided to conduct this trial as a pilot study due to the fact that the number of patients needed to achieve statistical significance was to high and would have taken almost 10 years. We established a recruitment period of 3 years, in wich we intend to include 60 patients.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
44 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial on Delay Phenomenon Utility in Preventing Oesophagogastric Anastomotic Dehiscence After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy. Pilot Study.
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: delay phenomenon by arteriography

intervention: delay phenomenon by arteriography. Patients who will be subjected a delay phenomenon by arteriographic procedure before esophageal resection surgery minimum 14 days before surgery. An angiogram of the celiac trunk is performed through a femoral access before and after the embolization. A 4-5 Fr Simmons or Cobra catheter is used for the catheterization and embolization of the left gastric artery, and 0.035-inch platinum coils are proximally placed from the main trunk in the splenic artery. When accessory left gastric arteries are present, they are catheterized and embolized as well. The right gastric artery catheterization is realized by a 4-5 Fr catheter and coils or microcoils are proximally placed in the artery as well.

Procedure: delay phenomenon by arteriographic approach
we improve the microvascularization of the gastric fundus occluding the right and left gastric artery, and splenic artery two weeks before surgery by arteriography

No Intervention: control group

Patients who will be operated directly without gastric ischemic conditioning. The investigators don't performed any arteriography before the esophageal surgical resection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Anastomotic leakage [7 days]

    investigators will consider anastomotic dehiscence the presence of one or more of the following conditions: radiologic confirmation by water-soluble contrast study (gastrografin administered orally) or thoracoabdominal Tc with oral contrast of dehiscence of oesophagogastric anastomosis or the stapler end of the gastroplasty. When the clinical conditions of patient don't allow a Rx control investigators will consider an anastomotic leakage in these conditions: Thoracic drain output of oesophagogastric content with amylase > 40 ukAT/L, confirmation of anastomotic dehiscence by the surgeon during a reintervention, endoscopic confirmation of anastomotic leakage of the stapled end of the plasty and methylene blue output after oral administration (100 ml of water with 10ml of methylene blue)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. plasty ischemia [7 days]

    investigators will consider plasty ischemia when one or more of the following criteria is present: endoscopic evidence of gastric mucosa ischemia evidence of low captation of the plasty in a thoracoabdominal CT with endovenous contrast that requires a reintervention. intraoperative mortality (during hospitalization and/or 30 days after surgery).

  2. hospital stay [90 days]

    investigators will consider since the day of the surgery until the day the patient will be discharged from the hospital

  3. major and minor morbidity [90 days]

    investigators will evaluate morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo classification

  4. postoperative mortality [during hospitalization and/or 30 days after surgery]

  5. post-embolization morbidity [30 days]

    investigators will consider post-embolization morbidity the following situations: abdominal pain with EVA>3 (evaluated by EVA classification ) pancreatitis diagnosed by abdominal pain and amylase > 5 uKat/L or by CT. abscess, pseudocyst diagnosed by CT or during oesophageal surgery spleen ischemia diagnosed by CT or abdominal ultrasound and needs some treatment liver ischemia diagnosed by Ct or abdominal ultrasound bleeding or artery dissection diagnosed during the embolization and needs some treatment arterial pseudoaneurism diagnosed during the embolization or by CT

  6. anastomotic stricture [6 months]

    investigators will consider anastomotic stricture when they observe a reduction of anastomotic diameter by oral contrast Rx and needs some treatment (endoscopic dilation or reintervention)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • All patients requiring a subtotal esophagectomy with en-bloc resection and an intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy for esophageal cancer

  • 18 or above years old

  • Acceptance and signing the full informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Absence of pancreatitis

  • Anatomic vascular alteration that contraindicate the embolization (congenital celiac trunk stenosis, presence of arcuate ligament,etc,..)

  • refuse to collaborate in the study

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Leandre Farran Teixidor L'Hospitalet De Llobregat Barcelona Spain 08907

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leandre F Teixidor, Ph D, MD, Bellvitge University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Leandre Farran Teixidor, Chief of oesophagogastric surgery department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02432794
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • APIL_2013
First Posted:
May 4, 2015
Last Update Posted:
Aug 20, 2019
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2019
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 20, 2019