The Comparison of Single and Multi-incision MIE for Esophageal Cancer

Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03646110
Collaborator
(none)
100
1
2
35.3
2.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been gradually adopted as a feasible and effective treatment option for esophageal cancer. Previously the investigators have published the adoption of single-incision approach both in the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic phases in MIE (SIMIE).The preliminary clinical results showed that SIMIE can provide an equivalent perioperative outcome whereas reduced the wound pain on the days 7 after surgery as compared to MIE performed with multi-incision (MIMIE). The goal of the current study was to conduct a prospective randomized trial to compare the perioperative outcome and survival of SIMIE and MIMIE.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Minimally invasive esophagectomy
N/A

Detailed Description

Surgery remains the main stay of treating esophageal cancer. However, esophagectomy is a complex and technical demanding surgical procedure harboring substantial morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been gradually adopted as a feasible and effective treatment option for esophageal cancer. The standardized procedure including lymph node dissection, esophageal mobilization and reconstruction can be effectively performed under minimized wound incision whereas rendering the patients a possibility of faster postoperative recovery and reduced risk of perioperative postoperative pulmonary complication. The procedure of MIE including the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic phases which are usually performed multiple incisional wounds. Previously the investigators have published the adoption of single-incision approach both in the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic phases in MIE (SIMIE). The preliminary clinical results showed that SIMIE can provide an equivalent perioperative outcome whereas reduced the wound pain on the days 7 after surgery as compared to MIE performed with multi-incision (MIMIE). The goal of the current study was to conduct a prospective randomized trial to compare the perioperative outcome and survival of SIMIE and MIMIE.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Comparison of Single and Multi-incision Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Treating Esophageal Cancer
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 17, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 26, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 26, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: single-incision MIE

Esophageal cancer patients received single-incision Minimally invasive esophagectomy

Procedure: Minimally invasive esophagectomy
Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a surgical procedure for esophageal resection

Active Comparator: multi-incision MIE

Esophageal cancer patients received multi-incision Minimally invasive esophagectomy

Procedure: Minimally invasive esophagectomy
Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a surgical procedure for esophageal resection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Overall survival rate [60 months]

    Overall survival rate of the participants after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain score as assessed by the face rating scale [1,7,14,28 days]

    The scale range of face rating scale is ranging from 0 (happy face) to 10 (crying face). Higher values represent a worse outcome.

  2. Ratio of ambulation [post-operative day 2 (POD2)]

    30-minute walk test

  3. Postoperative force vital capacity [1 and 3 months]

    Force vital capacity (FVC) is one of the most common parameters for pulmonary function measured in spirometry

  4. Post operative forced expiratory volume in one second [1 and 3 months]

    Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is one of the most common parameters for pulmonary function measured in spirometry

  5. Postoperative pulmonary complication [1 month]

    pulmonary complication after esophagectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
35 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients with a diagnosis of esophageal cancer

  2. Age between 35 to 75 years old

  3. Resectable tumor as evaluation by preoperative imaging studies.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Previous surgery in the chest or abdomen.

  2. Receiving definitive chemoradiation (5500 cGy or more).

  3. Tumor invasion to the trachea, spine or aorta.

  4. Liver cirrhosis with esophageal varices or liver cirrhosis refractory to medical treatment, Child C classification.

  5. Previous history of cerebral vascular attack.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Jang-Ming Lee Taipei City Zhongzheng Dist. Taiwan 100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
National Taiwan University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03646110
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 201804074RINA
First Posted:
Aug 24, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Nov 5, 2020
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by National Taiwan University Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 5, 2020