ESCCNCRTvNCT: Comparison Between NCRT and NCT Followed by MIE for Treatment of Locally Advanced Resectable ESCC
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy on patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(cT3-4aN0-1M0).
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
It is a prospective randomized phase III clinical trial sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital with other eight hospitals in China participating in. 264 patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(cT3-4aN0-1M0) are recruited and randomly assigned into the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (NCRT group) and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (NCT group) according to the proportion of 1:1.The safety,efficacy of protocols and prognosis of patients are compared between the two regimens.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is performed followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in enrolled patients. |
Procedure: Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
Before surgery, patients in this group receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. A total dose of 40 Gy is delivered in 20 fractions (5 fractions per week) for 4 weeks. Chemotherapy is delivered concomitantly and composed of four cycles of paclitaxel 50mg per square meter of body-surface area and cisplatin 25mg per square meter of body-surface area weekly at the intervals of radiotherapy. After neoadjuvant therapy of 4-8 weeks, minimally invasive esophagectomy is performed.
Other Names:
Procedure: Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
After neoadjuvant therapy, patients in groups receive minimally invasive esophagectomy
Other Names:
|
| Active Comparator: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is performed followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy in enrolled patients. |
Procedure: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Before surgery, patients in this group receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy is delivered and composed of two cycles of paclitaxel 135mg per square meter of body-surface area and cisplatin 75mg per square meter of body-surface area every 4 weeks. After neoadjuvant therapy of 4-8 weeks, minimally invasive esophagectomy is performed.
Other Names:
Procedure: Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
After neoadjuvant therapy, patients in groups receive minimally invasive esophagectomy
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Overall survival(OS) [Up to the date of death of any causes since the date of randomization, up to 36 months]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Progression-free survival(PFS) [Up to the date of disease recurrence since the date of randomization, up to 36 months]
Disease recurrence is defined as locoregional (esophageal bed or anastomotic or regional lymph nodes) or metastatic (supraclavicular lymph nodes or distant organs).
- Pathological response rate(pCR) [Up to the date of pathological reports obtained since the date of randomization, up to 12 months]
The resected specimen following neo-adjuvant treatment are assessed by using standardised work up of the resection specimen in the pathology department and standardised histological criteria for tumour regression grading. The degree of histomorphologic regression is clarified into four categories as follows: grade 1, no evidence of vital residual tumor cells (pathological complete response); grade 2, less than 10% vital residual tumor cells; grade 3, 10 to 50%; and grade 4, more than 50%.
- R0 resection rate [Up to the date of pathological reports obtained since the date of randomization, up to 12 months]
No vital tumor is presented at the proximal, distal, or circumferential resection margin, it is considered to be R0 resection. If a vital tumor is shown at 1 mm or less from the proximal, distal, or circumferential resection margin, it is considered to be microscopically positive (R1).
- Positive lymph nodes' number [Up to the date of pathological reports obtained since the date of randomization, up to 12 months]
According to pathological reports, record the number of positive lymph nodes
- Treatment related complications [Up to 1 month after surgery since the data of randomization, up to 13 months]
Number and severity of adverse events that are related to treatment of each patients, and hospital readmission.
- Quality of life(QOL) [Up to the end of follow-up since the data of surgery, up to 36 months]
QOL is respectively evaluated at randomization and 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and yearly after surgery among patients by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ-OES18
- Recurrence-free survival (RFS) [Up to the date of disease recurrence since the date of surgery, up to 36 months]
RFS is defined in resected patients who achieved an R0 or R1 resection as the time interval from surgery to the date of first recurrence (local, regional or distant) or death, whichever comes first.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Histologically-confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus;
-
Tumors of the esophagus are located in the thoracic cavity;
-
Pre-treatment stage as cT3-4aN0-1M0 (AJCC/UICC 7th Edition) (In case of stage cT4a, curative resectability has to be explicitly verified by the local surgical investigator prior to randomization).
-
Age is between 18 years and 75 years,
-
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1;
-
Adequate cardiac function. All patients should perform ECG, and those with a cardiac history or ECG abnormality should perform echocardiography with the left ventricular ejection fraction > 50 %.
-
Adequate respiratory function with FEV1≥1.2L, FEV1%≥50% and DLCO≥50% shown in pulmonary function tests.
-
Adequate bone marrow function (White Blood Cells >4x109 /L; Neutrophil >2.0×109 /L; Hemoglobin > 90 g/L; platelets>100x10^9 /L);
-
Adequate liver function (Total bilirubin <1.5x Upper Level of Normal (ULN); Aspartate transaminase(AST) and Alanine transaminase (ALT) <1.5x ULN);
-
Adequate renal function (Glomerular filtration rate (CCr) >60 ml/min; serum creatinine (SCr) ≤120 µmol/L)；
-
The patient has provided written informed consent and is able to understand and comply with the study;
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma histology;
-
Patients with advanced inoperable or metastatic esophageal cancer;
-
Pre-treatment stage as cT1-2N0-1M0 (AJCC/UICC 7th Edition);
-
Pre-treatment stage as cN2-3 or cT4b(non-curatively-resectable verified by the local surgical investigator, AJCC/UICC 7th Edition);
-
Patients with another previous or current malignant disease which is likely to interfere with treatment or the assessment of response in the judgement of the local surgical investigator.
-
Any patient with a significant medical condition which is thought unlikely to tolerate the therapies. Such as cardiac disease (e.g. symptomatic coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction within last 12 months), clinically-significant lung disease, clinically-significant bone marrow, liver, renal function disorder;
-
Pregnant or lactating women and fertile women who will not be using contraception during the trial;
-
Allergy to any drugs;
-
Participation in another intervention clinical trial with interference to the chemotherapeutic or chemoradiotherapeutic intervention during this study or during the last 30 days prior to informed consent;
-
Expected lack of compliance with the protocol.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai | China | 200032 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
- Ruijin Hospital
- Shanghai Chest Hospital
- First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
- Changzhi Medical College
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
- Wuhan Union Hospital, China
- Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
Investigators
- Study Director: Lijie Tan, MD, Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
- Wiley
- Wiley
- American society of clinical oncology
- Elsevier Science
- Elsevier Science
- American society of clinical oncology
- NCCN
- American society of clinical oncology
- Wiley
- Wolters kluwer
- Elsevier Science
- Wolters kluwer
- Springer
- Atypon
- Elsevier Science
- American society of clinical oncology
- Elsevier Science
- Springer
- Elsevier Science
- AME
- Oxford University Press
- Elsevier Science
- Elsevier Science
- Elsevier Science
- Springer
- Springer
- Wiley
Publications
- Feng M, Shen Y, Wang H, Tan L, Zhang Y, Khan MA, Wang Q. Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy: is the prone position a safe alternative to the decubitus position? J Am Coll Surg. 2012 May;214(5):838-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.047. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
- Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603.
- Shen Y, Zhang Y, Tan L, Feng M, Wang H, Khan MA, Liang M, Wang Q. Extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy during minimally invasive esophagectomy: optimal results from a single center. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Apr;16(4):715-21. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1824-7. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
- Shen Y, Zhong M, Wu W, Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, Wang Q. The impact of tidal volume on pulmonary complications following minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized and controlled study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1267-73; discussion 1273-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.043. Epub 2013 Aug 28. Erratum in: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):544.
- Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, Meyer HJ, Riera-Knorrenschild J, Langer P, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Bitzer M, Königsrainer A, Budach W, Wilke H. Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):851-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.0506. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
- Wang H, Feng M, Tan L, Wang Q. Comparison of the short-term quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic or open surgery. Dis Esophagus. 2010 Jul;23(5):408-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.01025.x. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
- CMISG1701