Outcomes of Esophageal Self Dilation for Benign Refractory Esophageal Stricture Management

Sponsor
Mayo Clinic (Other)
Overall Status
Enrolling by invitation
CT.gov ID
NCT03738566
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
49.3
0.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Among patients with refractory benign esophageal stricture (RBES) who were treated endoscopically, we hypothesized the following:

  1. Compared to a endoscopy as needed approach, esophageal self -dilation therapy (ESDT) decreases the number of endoscopic dilation, prolong dysphagia free interval

  2. Esophageal self -dilation therapy is safe and well tolerated therapy

  3. ESDT significantly lower the health cost in managing refractory esophageal stricture

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Esophageal self dilation
  • Procedure: Upper Endoscopy with Dilation
N/A

Detailed Description

Benign esophageal strictures can be challenging condition to treat. The mainstay of treatment is endoscopic dilations. However, 30 to 40% of these strictures recur despite rigorous dilations. Although a consensus definition does not exist, a stricture is typically termed as a refractory benign esophageal stricture (RBES), when there is a failure to maintain luminal patency after at least 5 endoscopic dilations.

Patients with RBES are extremely difficult to manage and the current armamentarium includes repeated endoscopic dilations, corticosteroid or mitomycin C injections, incisional therapy, and/ or temporary stent placement. These procedures are costly, their efficacy can be short-lived, and are associated with great burden both for the patient and clinician.

Esophageal self -dilation therapy (ESDT) is where the patient learns to pass a polyvinyl dilator orally on a routine basis. In past, smaller studies, ESDT appears to be effective for RBES, reducing the number of endoscopic dilations from an average of 21.7 to an average of 1.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Participants will be randomized into one of 2 arms.Participants will be randomized into one of 2 arms.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Outcomes of Esophageal Self Dilation for Benign Refractory Esophageal Stricture Management: Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 21, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Endoscopic Dilation

Patients randomized to the observation group will undergo repeat upper endoscopy with dilation as needed if their dysphagia relapses. A relapse will be considered if a patient developed solid food dysphagia at least once a week.

Procedure: Upper Endoscopy with Dilation
Patients will undergo repeat endoscopy and dilation as needed if their dysphagia relapse which is the current standard of care.

Active Comparator: Esophageal Self Dilation

Patients will be instructed to start Esophageal self dilation twice a day. If dysphagia is adequately controlled, and there was no resistance with passing the dilator, patients will be asked to decrease the frequency of ESDT to daily, weekly, and monthly over an average period of 6 months.

Device: Esophageal self dilation
Esophageal self dilation therapy (ESDT), where the patient learns to pass a polyvinyl dilator orally on a routine basis teaching will take over 1-3 training sessions by one of two esophageal physicians and a nurse. Patients will be instructed to start Esophageal self dilation twice a day. If dysphagia is adequately controlled, and there was no resistance with passing the dilator, patients will be asked to decrease the frequency of ESDT to daily, weekly, and monthly over an average period of 6 months as directed by the esophageal care team.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. The tolerability of esophageal self dilation compared to observation defined as number of endoscopic interventions [6 months]

    The number of patients who remained free of endoscopic therapy between the two groups

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Esophagram [6 months]

    The esophagram is an x-ray test that assesses the diameter of the esophagus. Patients whose esophagus achieves and remains 10-12mm

  2. Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire 30 Day (MDQ-30) [1 year]

    The MDQ-30 provides a series of questions for patients regarding their swallowing difficulties over the past 30 days. A total score of 40 or higher indicates positive for dysphagia, and a total score of 15 or lower is considered negative for dysphagia. Scores between 15 and 40 are considered indeterminate for dysphagia.

  3. Upper endoscopy: Number of endoscopic interventions [6 months]

    Participants who experience dysphagia more than once per week will return for an upper endoscopy and dilation

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • 18 years of age or older

  • Refractory benign esophageal stricture defined as an esophageal stricture with persistent dysphagia despite undergoing 5 endoscopic dilations within a 1 year period. Persistent dysphagia will be considered if patients has solid food dysphagia at least once a week

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patient with malignant esophageal stricture

  • Angulated stricture which prevents safe passage of Maloney dilator in office setting

  • In ability to achieve an esophageal diameter of 10 mm with endoscopic dilation

  • Known significant esophageal motor disorder (i.e. achalasia, aperistalsis, functional obstruction, jackhammer, distal esophageal spasm)*

  • The presence of esophageal stent

  • Inability to learn self-dilation secondary to blindness or cognitive dysfunction

  • Use of chronic anticoagulants

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota United States 55905

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Mayo Clinic

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Alexander, MD, Mayo Clinic

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

Responsible Party:
Jeffrey A Alexander, Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03738566
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 18-000246
First Posted:
Nov 13, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Jan 26, 2022
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 26, 2022