Safety and Efficacy of Ilaprazole 5, 20 and 40 mg QD and Lansoprazole 30 mg QD on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of daily treatment with Ilaprazole (5, 20 and 40 mg), once daily (QD), compared to lansoprazole 30 mg in healing subjects with endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
This 8 week study will be conducted by approximately 160 investigators in the United States. During this study, esophagitis healing will be evaluated by endoscopy, heartburn and other symptom relief will be evaluated by questionnaire and study drug levels will be measured.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Ilaprazole 5 mg QD
|
Drug: Ilaprazole
Ilaprazole 5 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Experimental: Ilaprazole 20 mg QD
|
Drug: Ilaprazole
Ilaprazole 20 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Experimental: Ilaprazole 40 mg QD
|
Drug: Ilaprazole
Ilaprazole 40 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Active Comparator: Lansoprazole 30 mg QD
|
Drug: Lansoprazole
Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The crude healing rate of Erosive Esophagitis at week 4 of treatment as assessed by endoscopy. [Week 4]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- The crude healing rate of Erosive Esophagitis at week 8 of treatment as assessed by endoscopy. [Week 8]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject must have endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis as defined by the Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grading System (A-D).
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Evidence of uncontrolled, clinically significant systemic disease; acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDs); a condition likely to require surgery; cancer within 5 years of screening; or abnormal laboratory values.
-
Co-existing diseases affecting the esophagus; history of esophageal radiation therapy, cryotherapy, or physiochemical trauma.
-
History of esophageal surgery or dilatation of an esophageal stricture other than Schatzki's ring; gastric or duodenal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer.
-
Active gastric or duodenal ulcers or acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 30 days prior to screening.
-
Current or history of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory conditions.
-
Allergy to any proton pump inhibitor drug (omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, esomeprazole), any component of Ilaprazole, or antacid.
-
Unable to tolerate lactose.
-
Use of the following medications prior to randomization or anticipated use during the study: proton pump inhibitors, antacids, biphosphonates, histamine (H2) receptor antagonist (examples: Zantac, Tagamet), sucralfate, misoprostol, corticosteroids, prokinetics, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), strong anticholinergics, anticoagulant/anti-platelet aggregate therapy, anticoagulants, digoxin, theophylline, phenytoin.
-
History of alcoholism or drug addiction.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hueytown | Alabama | United States | ||
2 | Huntsville | Alabama | United States | ||
3 | Chandler | Arizona | United States | ||
4 | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | ||
5 | Tempe | Arizona | United States | ||
6 | Tucson | Arizona | United States | ||
7 | Sherwood | Arkansas | United States | ||
8 | Anaheim | California | United States | ||
9 | Cypress | California | United States | ||
10 | Encinitas | California | United States | ||
11 | Garden Grove | California | United States | ||
12 | Irvine | California | United States | ||
13 | Lancaster | California | United States | ||
14 | Mission Hills | California | United States | ||
15 | Oakland | California | United States | ||
16 | Orange | California | United States | ||
17 | Pasadena | California | United States | ||
18 | San Diego | California | United States | ||
19 | West Covina | California | United States | ||
20 | Colorado Springs | Colorado | United States | ||
21 | Longmont | Colorado | United States | ||
22 | Pueblo | Colorado | United States | ||
23 | Bristol | Connecticut | United States | ||
24 | Washington | District of Columbia | United States | ||
25 | Longwood | Florida | United States | ||
26 | Miami | Florida | United States | ||
27 | New Smyrna Beach | Florida | United States | ||
28 | Pembroke Pines | Florida | United States | ||
29 | Tampa | Florida | United States | ||
30 | Zephyrhills | Florida | United States | ||
31 | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | ||
32 | Conyers | Georgia | United States | ||
33 | Newnan | Georgia | United States | ||
34 | Tucker | Georgia | United States | ||
35 | Boise | Idaho | United States | ||
36 | Moline | Illinois | United States | ||
37 | Rockford | Illinois | United States | ||
38 | Clive | Iowa | United States | ||
39 | Davenport | Iowa | United States | ||
40 | Dubuque | Iowa | United States | ||
41 | Wichita | Kansas | United States | ||
42 | Metairie | Louisiana | United States | ||
43 | Chevy Chase | Maryland | United States | ||
44 | Prince Frederick | Maryland | United States | ||
45 | Olive Branch | Mississippi | United States | ||
46 | Jefferson City | Missouri | United States | ||
47 | Kansas City | Missouri | United States | ||
48 | Mexico | Missouri | United States | ||
49 | Egg Harbor Township | New Jersey | United States | ||
50 | Albuquerque | New Mexico | United States | ||
51 | Binghamton | New York | United States | ||
52 | Great Neck | New York | United States | ||
53 | Rochester | New York | United States | ||
54 | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | United States | ||
55 | Fayetteville | North Carolina | United States | ||
56 | Greensboro | North Carolina | United States | ||
57 | Raleigh | North Carolina | United States | ||
58 | Wilmington | North Carolina | United States | ||
59 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States | ||
60 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | ||
61 | Dayton | Ohio | United States | ||
62 | Norman | Oklahoma | United States | ||
63 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States | ||
64 | Medford | Oregon | United States | ||
65 | Portland | Oregon | United States | ||
66 | Beaver Falls | Pennsylvania | United States | ||
67 | Harrisburg | Pennsylvania | United States | ||
68 | Lansdale | Pennsylvania | United States | ||
69 | Warwick | Rhode Island | United States | ||
70 | Anderson | South Carolina | United States | ||
71 | Charleston | South Carolina | United States | ||
72 | Goose Creek | South Carolina | United States | ||
73 | Mt. Pleasant | South Carolina | United States | ||
74 | Sioux Falls | South Dakota | United States | ||
75 | Bristol | Tennessee | United States | ||
76 | Chattanooga | Tennessee | United States | ||
77 | Johnson City | Tennessee | United States | ||
78 | Nashville | Tennessee | United States | ||
79 | Amarillo | Texas | United States | ||
80 | Austin | Texas | United States | ||
81 | Beaumont | Texas | United States | ||
82 | Bryan | Texas | United States | ||
83 | El Paso | Texas | United States | ||
84 | Fort Worth | Texas | United States | ||
85 | Houston | Texas | United States | ||
86 | Odessa | Texas | United States | ||
87 | San Antonio | Texas | United States | ||
88 | Midvale | Utah | United States | ||
89 | Ogden | Utah | United States | ||
90 | Newport News | Virginia | United States | ||
91 | Norfolk | Virginia | United States | ||
92 | Spokane | Washington | United States | ||
93 | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | United States | ||
94 | Monroe | Wisconsin | United States |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Takeda
Investigators
- Study Director: Medical Director, Takeda
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Z-EE05-123
- U1111-1127-6202