Effects of Octanoic Acid for Treatment of Essential Voice Tremor
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Essential voice tremor is a neurological condition that produces a regular, shaking quality in the voice. One form of drug treatment that produces some improvement in tremor of the hands is octanoic acid, which is a food additive that is similar to alcohol. Research suggests that octanoic acid may reduce tremor in the hands/arms with few side effects and no intoxication effects. This study will determine whether octanoic acid may be useful for reducing tremor when it affects the voice. Researchers are hypothesizing that octanoic acid will reduce the effects of tremor on the voice.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
Background:
-
Essential tremor of the voice produces regular shaking and hoarseness in the voice, making it difficult speech difficult to understand
-
Several previous studies have found that octanoic acid and octanol, which are related to alcohol, can improve tremor in some people without producing many side effects and without producing intoxication
-
Researchers are interested in determining whether octanoic acid can improve tremor that affects the voice
Objectives:
-
To determine the effects of octanoic voice using voice recordings and listener ratings of voice
-
To determine the effects of octanoic acid on level of voice disability experienced by people with essential voice tremor
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Inactive capsule Participants will receive a pill/capsule with an inactive ingredient during the placebo arm of this study. |
Drug: Inactive capsule
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Octanoic acid Participants will receive a pill/capsule with octanoic acid (amount determined by the participant's weight) during the experimental arm of this study. |
Drug: Octanoic acid
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Magnitude of Acoustic Amplitude Tremor and Magnitude of Acoustic Frequency Tremor [Measured at baseline visits (1 & 2) and after 3 weeks of placebo or octanoic acid on post-test visits (1 & 2)]
Voice recordings were used to measure the degree of tremor in the voice. Mean post-test values for each acoustic measure were compared after the octanoic acid and placebo conditions, with and without consideration of baseline values. Mean values represent the average of two testing days. Degree of amplitude tremor shows the extent of amplitude variation as a percent of the mean signal amplitude, with lower numbers indicating less amplitude tremor. Baseline values for magnitude of amplitude tremor across all participants and conditions ranged from 4.06 to 27.09, and post-test values ranged from 1.94 to 26.02. Degree of frequency tremor shows the extent of fundamental frequency variation as a percent of the mean signal frequency, with lower numbers indicating less frequency tremor. Baseline values for magnitude of frequency tremor across all participants and conditions ranged from 1.21 to 15.31, and post-test values ranged from 0.60 to 13.86.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Auditory-perceptual Tremor Severity Ratings [Measured at baseline visits (1 & 2) and after 3 weeks of placebo or octanoic acid on post-test visits (1 & 2).]
Three experienced listeners independently rated each participant's voice from paired sample recordings comparing the baseline to post-test samples in randomized order for each condition. Sustained vowel and sentence-level recordings were rated, with decoded samples later analyzed for 1=better for post-test compared to baseline, 0= no difference between post-test and baseline. Maximum score for each participant was 3 (post-test was better for each of three raters). The range of possible scores was the sum of each of three raters' scores (0 to 3), with 0 indicating no difference between baseline and post-test voice tremor severity rating, and 3 indicating better voice (less tremor severity) at post-testing compared to pre-testing. Mean post-test values for task were compared for the octanoic acid and placebo conditions, and all raters were blind to which sample was a baseline versus a post-test recording, and which samples were associated with the [placebo or octanoic acid conditions.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Participants have a diagnosis of essential voice tremor and show signs of tremor during the endoscopy examination (when pictures of the voice box are obtained)during screening appointment
-
Participants show measurable voice tremor from recordings of the voice during screening appointment
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Participants have a diagnosis or show signs of Parkinson's Disease or another non-essential tremor movement disorder
-
Participants have a diagnosis or show signs of spasmodic dysphonia (a different neurological voice disorder)
-
Participants have a diagnosis of a severe, non-stable medical condition, such as kidney or liver failure, severe heart disease, severe lung disease, severe metabolic disease, uncontrolled hyperthyroidism, or other life-threatening disease such as active cancer
-
Participants have a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
-
Participants are unable to suspend/stop a medication that they are currently taking for tremor or voice disorder for 12 weeks to complete this study
-
Participants have a dependence on alcohol or allergy to alcohol
-
Participants are pregnant or lactating
-
Participants have an allergy to soy
-
Participants have Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Syracuse University & Upstate Medical University | Syracuse | New York | United States | 13210 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Syracuse University
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Soren Y Lowell, PhD, Syracuse University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 370955-3
- 1R03DC012429-01A1
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Inactive Capsule First | Octanoic Acid First |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants who were randomized to receive a capsule with an inactive ingredient (placebo) during the first 3 weeks of the study (placebo arm of crossover design study), and then received octanoic acid in the last 3 weeks of the study. Placebo | Participants who were randomized to receive a capsule with octanoic acid (amount determined by the participant's weight) during the first 3 weeks of the study (experimental arm of crossover design study), and then received the placebo in the last 3 weeks of the study. Octanoic acid |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 10 | 7 |
COMPLETED | 9 | 7 |
NOT COMPLETED | 1 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Inactive Capsule First | Octanoic Acid First | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants who were randomized to receive a capsule with an inactive ingredient (placebo) during the first 3 weeks of the study (placebo arm of crossover design study), and then received octanoic acid in the last 3 weeks of the study. Placebo | Participants who were randomized to receive a capsule with octanoic acid (amount determined by the participant's weight) during the first 3 weeks of the study (experimental arm of crossover design study), and then received the placebo in the last 3 weeks of the study. Octanoic acid | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 10 | 7 | 17 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
68.90
(7.20)
|
70.43
(11.70)
|
69.53
(9.01)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
9
90%
|
6
85.7%
|
15
88.2%
|
Male |
1
10%
|
1
14.3%
|
2
11.8%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
10
100%
|
7
100%
|
17
100%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
White |
10
100%
|
7
100%
|
17
100%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Magnitude of Acoustic Amplitude Tremor and Magnitude of Acoustic Frequency Tremor |
---|---|
Description | Voice recordings were used to measure the degree of tremor in the voice. Mean post-test values for each acoustic measure were compared after the octanoic acid and placebo conditions, with and without consideration of baseline values. Mean values represent the average of two testing days. Degree of amplitude tremor shows the extent of amplitude variation as a percent of the mean signal amplitude, with lower numbers indicating less amplitude tremor. Baseline values for magnitude of amplitude tremor across all participants and conditions ranged from 4.06 to 27.09, and post-test values ranged from 1.94 to 26.02. Degree of frequency tremor shows the extent of fundamental frequency variation as a percent of the mean signal frequency, with lower numbers indicating less frequency tremor. Baseline values for magnitude of frequency tremor across all participants and conditions ranged from 1.21 to 15.31, and post-test values ranged from 0.60 to 13.86. |
Time Frame | Measured at baseline visits (1 & 2) and after 3 weeks of placebo or octanoic acid on post-test visits (1 & 2) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Octanoic Acid |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants who received a capsule with an inactive ingredient (placebo) during either the first or last 3 weeks of the study. Placebo | Participants who received a capsule with octanoic acid (amount determined by the participant's weight) during either the first or last 3 weeks of the study. Octanoic acid |
Measure Participants | 16 | 16 |
Baseline Magnitude of Acoustic Amplitude Tremor |
12.91
(6.46)
|
13.49
(6.48)
|
Post-test Magnitude of Acoustic Amplitude Tremor |
12.43
(7.37)
|
9.35
(5.42)
|
Baseline Magnitude of Acoustic Frequency Tremor |
5.57
(4.29)
|
5.19
(3.58)
|
Post-test Magnitude of Acoustic Frequency Tremor |
5.35
(3.76)
|
3.98
(2.94)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Octanoic Acid |
---|---|---|
Comments | Separate measures for magnitude of amplitude tremor and magnitude of frequency tremor were analyzed as these variables can respond differently to treatment and may be differentially affected in essential voice tremor. Statistical modeling tested for post-treatment drug differences, with testing session as a repeated factor. Models were run with and without inclusion of baseline averages as a covariate per recommendations for cross-over treatment studies (Fleiss, Wallenstein & Rosenfeld, 1985). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0216 |
Comments | Statistical results for Magnitude of acoustic amplitude tremor. A priori significance threshold was set at P<0.05 for each of the two hypothesis-driven acoustic variables. | |
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | This statistical test did not use the baseline scores as a covariate when comparing post-test scores between placebo and octanoic acid conditions. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Octanoic Acid |
---|---|---|
Comments | Separate measures for magnitude of amplitude tremor and magnitude of frequency tremor were analyzed as these variables can respond differently to treatment and may be differentially affected in essential voice tremor. Statistical modeling tested for post-treatment drug differences, with testing session as a repeated factor. Models were run with and without inclusion of baseline averages as a covariate per recommendations for cross-over treatment studies (Fleiss, Wallenstein & Rosenfeld, 1985). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0499 |
Comments | Statistical results for Magnitude of acoustic amplitude tremor. A priori significance threshold was set at P<0.05 for each of the two hypothesis-driven acoustic variables. | |
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | This statistical test used the baseline scores as a covariate when comparing post-test scores between placebo and octanoic acid conditions. |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Octanoic Acid |
---|---|---|
Comments | Separate measures for magnitude of amplitude tremor and magnitude of frequency tremor were analyzed as these variables can respond differently to treatment and may be differentially affected in essential voice tremor. Statistical modeling tested for post-treatment drug differences, with testing session as a repeated factor. Models were run with and without inclusion of baseline averages as a covariate per recommendations for cross-over treatment studies (Fleiss, Wallenstein & Rosenfeld, 1985). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0339 |
Comments | Statistical results for Magnitude of acoustic frequency tremor. A priori significance threshold was set at P<0.05 for each of the two hypothesis-driven acoustic variables. | |
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | This statistical test did not use the baseline scores as a covariate when comparing post-test scores between placebo and octanoic acid conditions. |
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Octanoic Acid |
---|---|---|
Comments | Separate measures for magnitude of amplitude tremor and magnitude of frequency tremor were analyzed as these variables can respond differently to treatment and may be differentially affected in essential voice tremor. Statistical modeling tested for post-treatment drug differences, with testing session as a repeated factor. Models were run with and without inclusion of baseline averages as a covariate per recommendations for cross-over treatment studies (Fleiss, Wallenstein & Rosenfeld, 1985). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0450 |
Comments | Statistical results for Magnitude of acoustic frequency tremor. A priori significance threshold was set at P<0.05 for each of the two hypothesis-driven acoustic variables. | |
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | This statistical test used the baseline scores as a covariate when comparing post-test scores between placebo and octanoic acid conditions. |
Title | Auditory-perceptual Tremor Severity Ratings |
---|---|
Description | Three experienced listeners independently rated each participant's voice from paired sample recordings comparing the baseline to post-test samples in randomized order for each condition. Sustained vowel and sentence-level recordings were rated, with decoded samples later analyzed for 1=better for post-test compared to baseline, 0= no difference between post-test and baseline. Maximum score for each participant was 3 (post-test was better for each of three raters). The range of possible scores was the sum of each of three raters' scores (0 to 3), with 0 indicating no difference between baseline and post-test voice tremor severity rating, and 3 indicating better voice (less tremor severity) at post-testing compared to pre-testing. Mean post-test values for task were compared for the octanoic acid and placebo conditions, and all raters were blind to which sample was a baseline versus a post-test recording, and which samples were associated with the [placebo or octanoic acid conditions. |
Time Frame | Measured at baseline visits (1 & 2) and after 3 weeks of placebo or octanoic acid on post-test visits (1 & 2). |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Octanoic Acid |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants who received a capsule with an inactive ingredient (placebo) during either the first or last 3 weeks of the study. Placebo | Participants who received a capsule with octanoic acid (amount determined by the participant's weight) during either the first or last 3 weeks of the study. Octanoic acid |
Measure Participants | 16 | 16 |
Sustained vowel, summed binary ratings (0-3) |
1.25
(1.13)
|
1.53
(1.13)
|
Sentence-level, summed binary ratings (0-3) |
1.63
(1.12)
|
1.19
(0.87)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Octanoic Acid |
---|---|---|
Comments | Statistical modeling tested for main effects of auditory-perceptual ratings for drug and task (sustained vowel and sentence-level ratings), and interaction effects of these variables. The summed scores, averaged across all participants, are provided separately for the sustained vowel and sentence-level ratings. Values range from 0 (no difference between baseline and post-test) to 3 (all three raters indicated that post-test sample was better (less tremor severity). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.7172 |
Comments | A priori significance was set at P<0.05 for this hypothesis-driven auditory-perceptual variable. Main effect for drug is given above. For the main task effect, P=0.9602. For the interaction effect of drug*task, P=0.1699. | |
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | For each participant, adverse event data were collected over approximately an 11 week period. This included data beginning with baseline testing in week 1, Phase 1 (placebo or octanoic acid condition) and continued through the week after post-test data was completed for Phase 2, on the final study visit (final nursing assessment visit). | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Participants completed symptom questionnaires with an independent nurse at four time-points: baseline before either the placebo or octanoic acid conditions, during the 3 weeks intake for each study phase, and upon completion of the study. Additionally, participants were called daily to inquire about any symptoms/symptom severity for three days after full drug intake was initiated for each study phase (placebo or octanoic acid) and then every 3-5 days thereafter each 3 week dosing period. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Octanoic Acid | ||
Arm/Group Description | Study phase 1 or 2, when participants were randomized to the 3-week intervention phase in which an inactive capsule (placebo or inactive drug) was taken once a day for 3 weeks. | Study phase 1 or 2, when participants were randomized to the 3-week intervention phase in which octanoic acid (the active drug) was taken once a day for 3 weeks. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Placebo | Octanoic Acid | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/17 (0%) | 0/17 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Placebo | Octanoic Acid | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/17 (0%) | 0/17 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Placebo | Octanoic Acid | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/17 (5.9%) | 0/17 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Diarrhea | 1/17 (5.9%) | 1 | 0/17 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Soren Lowell |
---|---|
Organization | Syracuse University |
Phone | 315-443-9648 |
slowell@syr.edu |
- 370955-3
- 1R03DC012429-01A1