Evaluating Pulse Oximetry Bias in Children With Darker Skin Pigmentation

Sponsor
Stanford University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05617547
Collaborator
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (U.S. Fed), University of California, San Francisco (Other)
154
1
25
6.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this prospective study, the investigators will enroll 154 children with arterial lines to determine the accuracy of pulse oximeters in children with darker skin pigmentation. Studies in adults suggest pulse oximeters may overestimate the true level of oxygenation in the blood as measured directly by co-oximetry. However, pediatric data are relatively limited. This study, which is funded by the FDA through the Stanford-UCSF (University of California San Francisco) Clinical Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI) Program, will determine if the error/bias is associated with skin pigmentation and whether the error falls outside FDA standards. The broader purpose of the study is to work toward eliminating health disparities.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Pulse Oximeter (Massimo)

Detailed Description

As a conventional patient vital sign, pulse oximetry is used widely to determine whether a patient is adequately oxygenated. However, studies suggest that peripheral pulse oximetry (Sp02) systematically overestimates the true arterial oxygen saturation (Sa02) in patients with darker skin pigmentation. This error or bias places patients with darker skin pigmentation at considerable risk by failing to detect important levels of hypoxemia that drive critical treatment decisions like medication usage for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-COV-2 (COVID) infection, hospital admission, ICU transfer and intubation. Except for the original description of the problem published by Bickler and colleagues in 2005, most studies (including one pediatric study) have been limited to retrospective studies where the racial/ethnic category is used as a proxy for skin pigmentation, so-called "paired" oximetry measurements may be separated by several minutes where the oxygen saturation can readily change, and important technical factors such a perfusion quality, motion artifact, and light transmittance are not reliably documented. This information is critical because emerging studies suggest that perfusion effects, as measured by the perfusion index (PI), may account for much of the error observed in patients with darker pigmentation. The limitations of prior studies can be readily overcome with a prospective study where skin pigmentation is measured objectively and at the location of the oximeter sensor, SpO2/SaO2 (arterial oxygen saturation) measurements are collected nearly simultaneously while at steady state, and technical factors such as perfusion status, transmittance, and temperature can be accurately recorded. This study will enroll 154 children at Stanford's Lucile Packard Children's Hospital to determine whether the mean bias (error) in FDA-cleared pulse oximeters increases with darker skin pigmentation, and whether this error falls outside of the FDA standard of 3%. The primary study hypothesis is that in children ≤21 years of age managed in a real-world hospital setting, the mean bias (error) in FDA-cleared pulse oximeters increases with increased skin pigmentation as measured by colorimetry and standard pigmentation scales (Fitzpatrick and von Luschan pigmentation scales). The secondary hypothesis is that the mean bias is mitigated when technical factors like perfusion index are accounted for in adjusted models. Data generated from this study will help to identify the impact of darker skin pigmentation on medical device performance in the pediatric population and ultimately help eliminate health disparities.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
154 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Cross-Sectional
Official Title:
Prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of Pulse Oximeters in Children With Darker Skin Pigmentation
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 31, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Pulse Oximetry Observational Cohort

Diagnostic Test: Pulse Oximeter (Massimo)
The Massimo LNCS (low noise cabled sensors) pulse oximeter will be used to estimate the oxygen saturation and compared to the gold standard, the arterial oxygen saturation in the blood as measured by co-oximetry. The pulse oximeters is FDA cleared for this purpose so patients will not be exposed to any interventions that are not standard of care.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Saturation by pulse oximetry (Sp02) [Up to 2 weeks after consent and arterial line placement (where Sp02 will be compared to simultaneous measurements of the Sa02, or oxygen saturation using blood from the artery)]

    Oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A to 21 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Age ≤21 years of age

  2. Requires arterial vascular access as part of routine clinical care

  3. Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Anemia defined as a Hgb <8 g/dL

  2. Methemoglobinemia or carbon monoxide poisoning where the SpO2 is known to be inaccurate

  3. Skin condition, such as epidermolysis bullosa, where pulse oximetry not expected to be accurate, or application of skin probes is medically inadvisable

  4. Non-pulsatile patients (e.g., left ventricular assist device (LVAD), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

  5. Lack of informed consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Palo Alto California United States 94304

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Stanford University
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  • University of California, San Francisco

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Christopher Almond, Professor of Pediatrics, Stanford University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05617547
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SU_IRB_66947
First Posted:
Nov 15, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Nov 15, 2022
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 15, 2022