Evaluation of MAF-1217 in Patients With DED

Sponsor
VISUfarma SpA (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03833882
Collaborator
(none)
72
2
2
6.7
36
5.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a pre-market, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, crossover, non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy of MAF-1217 and Cationorm® in adult patients with evaporative DED.

The study population will be divided in 4 different subgroups, according to the different types of evaporative DED:

  1. Group A: high evaporative levels

  2. Group B: females in menopause, whether using hormonal integration or not

  3. Group C: presence of active obstructive Meibomian gland disease

  4. Group D: glaucomatous patients

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: MAF1217
  • Other: Cationorm
N/A

Detailed Description

Patients will be enrolled after having signed the informed consent form prior any other study procedure and after inclusion/exclusion criteria check.

Each patient will be planned to perform 6 study visits and at each visit all necessary study procedures will be performed according to the clinical investigation plan requirements (see flow-chart).

The study visits will be performed at: screening, baseline, week 2, week 6, week 8, week 12.

Patients will be enrolled at screening visit and at baseline, after the wash-out period of 1 week, then will be randomized to receive MAF-1217 or Cationorm® for the following 6 weeks.

After this time lapse, patients will be switched to the opposite therapy for 6 additional weeks.

The entire study population will be asked for a TID posology, and will be divided in 4 different subgroups, according to the different types of evaporative DED.

Certain test will be performed only in some patients:

Osmolimetry and tear sampling in 20 patients(10/site) chosen random from groups B, C and D; Ferning test only in group D; tear film collection and cytokine expression only in 20 patients form site nr. 2.

Patients will be allowed to carry on any systemic or local medications, apart lubricating eyedrops, which have to be stopped the day before baseline visit.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
72 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Performance of the Tear Substitute MAF-1217 in Patients With Evaporative DED
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 27, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 19, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 19, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: MAF1217/Cationorm

Device: MAF1217
The study population will have to self-administer the study treatment in a TID posology.

Other: Cationorm
The study population will have to self-administer the study treatment in a TID posology.

Experimental: Cationorm/MAF1217

Device: MAF1217
The study population will have to self-administer the study treatment in a TID posology.

Other: Cationorm
The study population will have to self-administer the study treatment in a TID posology.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Break-up time (BUT) differences [measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline]

    Changes in break-up time (BUT) versus baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. ocular surface staining (corneal and conjunctival) [measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline]

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in ocular surface staining (corneal and conjunctival)

  2. Schirmer I test (ST) (without anesthesia) [measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline]

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in Schirmer I test (ST) (without anesthesia)

  3. number of blinking per minute [measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline]

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in number of blinking per minute

  4. Ferning test (Group D) [measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline]

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in Ferning test (Group D)

  5. osmolarity [measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline]

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in osmolarity

  6. patient satisfaction (10 points VAS scale) [measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment versus baseline]

    Cross-over analysis for the differences versus baseline between the two groups on changes in patient satisfaction (10 points VAS scale). (VAS: scale where patient has to specify level of satisfaction by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points (0 - 10). 0 indicates no satisfaction while 10 represents the highest level).

  7. OSDI [measured at week 2, 6, 8 and 12 weeks treatment]

    Changes in questionnaire scores (OSDI - Ocular Surface Disease Index). The overall Ocular Surface Disease score defined the ocular surface as normal (0-12 points) or as having mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points) disease.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. At least 18 years old (adult patients), male and female

  2. Schirmer I test > 10 mm at 5'

  3. (Group A): high evaporative levels

  4. (Group B): females in menopause, both using hormonal integration or not

  5. (Group C): presence of active obstructive Meibomian gland disease, defined as at least one of the following:

  • Meibomian orifice plugging

  • eyelid margin foaminess

  • changes in orifice position with respect to the mucocutaneous junction

  • abnormal Meibomian gland secretions (opaque and viscous-like form that is difficult to express)

  1. (Group D): glaucomatous patients receiving one or more BAK preserved treatments for at least 2 years, showing an abnormal Ferning test (Types 3 or 4 according to Rolando)

  2. all: wishing to participate in the study and able to sign the ICF

Inclusion criteria to be checked at baseline:
  1. BUT < 7"

  2. Mild to severe DED according to OSDI chart

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Neuropathic causes of dry eye (diabetes, long-standing contact lens wearing, previous ocular herpes infections)

  2. Coexisting corneal diseases

  3. Autoimmune diseases

  4. Past or active cicatricial conjunctivitis

  5. Past ocular surface burns

  6. Keratinization of the eyelid margin

  7. Sjogren syndrome

  8. History of corneal trauma

  9. Pregnant and lactating women

  10. Younger than 18 years old patients

  11. Use of contact lenses

  12. inability to self administer study medications

  13. (GROUPS B, D) Presence of active obstructive Meibomian gland disease

  14. (GROUP C) Presence of cicatricial Meibomian gland disease

  15. known allergic sensitivity to any of the devices ingredients or any other known allergy

  16. participation in a clinical trial during the 3 months prior to the beginning of the study

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Ospedale San Paolo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Milan Italy 20121
2 ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco P.O.L. Sacco Milan Italy 20157

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • VISUfarma SpA

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
VISUfarma SpA
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03833882
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • VF-OS-001/2018
First Posted:
Feb 7, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Jul 15, 2019
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 15, 2019