Examining Racial and SocioEconomic Disparities (ERASED) in Chronic Low Back Pain Study

Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03338192
Collaborator
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) (NIH)
240
1
60.8
3.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

It remains unclear whether certain disadvantaged subgroups of society may be at heightened risk for poor chronic low back pain (cLBP) outcomes. The overall aim of this study is to incorporate a socioeconomic framework to characterize racial differences in cLBP severity and disability. Further, guided by the theory of fundamental causes, we aim to examine racial and socioeconomic status differences in biopsychosocial predictors of cLBP outcomes, particularly endogenous pain modulation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: QST

Detailed Description

Experimental session 1

Resting Blood Pressure and Body Mass Index will be assessed. Participants will complete the Rapid Estimation of Adult Literacy Measure-Short Form (REALM-SF) to determine health literacy. Participants will complete multiple questionnaires to measure Socioeconomic Status, Clinical Pain Assessment and Depression Scale. All participants will undergo quantitative sensory testing for assessment of endogenous pain modulation using painful heat, mechanical, and cold stimuli in a laboratory session lasting approximately 1 hour.

Between Experimental Session 1 and Experimental Session 2

Sleep assessment: Sleep data will be collected by participants in their own homes using objective and subjective measures of their sleep. Participant instructions for how to collect and record their own sleep data will be provided at the end of study session 1.

Experimental Session 2

Experimental session 2 will take place in the CCTS Clinical Research Unit (CRU) All blood will be collected as part of a single draw by research nurses. Participants will complete multiple questionnaires to measure Clinical Pain Assessment and Coping Strategies.

Participants will then complete a battery of ecologically valid movement tasks that include:
  1. getting in and out of a bed; 2) sitting in a chair, transitioning to a standing position, and then sitting again, and 3) lifting, Performance Battery (SPPB) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). Blood will be processed and stored and then used to measure Vitamin D, CRP assays and Oxytocin. Finally follow up data will be collected by phone once per week for four weeks following the completion of study session 2.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
240 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in Chronic Low Back Pain
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 15, 2017
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Nov 8, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 8, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
African American/Black QST

This group will consist of a full range of socioeconomic status in African American/Black individuals with chronic low back pain.

Other: QST
All participants will undergo quantitative sensory testing for assessment of endogenous pain modulation using painful heat, mechanical, and cold stimuli in a laboratory session lasting approximately 1 hour.

Caucasian/White QST

This group will consist of a full range of socioeconomic status in Caucasian/White individuals with chronic low back pain.

Other: QST
All participants will undergo quantitative sensory testing for assessment of endogenous pain modulation using painful heat, mechanical, and cold stimuli in a laboratory session lasting approximately 1 hour.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Clinical Pain Severity [Baseline to one week.]

    Participants will self-report a number between 0 - 100 describing the intensity of their low back pain, such that 0 = no pain and 100 = the most intense pain imaginable. Any integer from 0 to 100 can be provided.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain threshold [Baseline]

    Pain threshold refers to the intensity at which a stimulus is first perceived as painful. Heat stimuli will be delivered using a computer-controlled thermal stimulation system with a 30 millimeter X 30 millimeter probe. From a baseline of 32 degrees Celsius, the probe temperature will increase at a rate of .5 degrees Celsius/second until the participant responds by pressing a button on a handheld device. For heat pain threshold, participants will be instructed to press the button when the sensation "first becomes painful"

  2. Pain tolerance [Baseline]

    Pain tolerance refers to the maximum amount of pain produced by a stimulus that a person is able/willing to tolerate. Heat stimuli will again be delivered using the computer-controlled thermal stimulation system. From a baseline of 32 degrees Celsius, the probe temperature will increase at a rate of .5 degrees Celsius/second until the participant responds by pressing a button on a handheld device. For heat pain tolerance, participants will be instructed to press the button when they are "no longer willing to tolerate" the painful sensation.

  3. Temporal summation of pain [Baseline]

    Temporal summation of pain refers to a form of endogenous pain facilitation characterized by the perception of increased pain despite constant or even reduced peripheral afferent input. Temporal summation is presumed to be the psychophysical manifestation of wind-up. Wind-up is a phenomenon where repetitive stimulation of C primary afferents at rates greater than 0.3 Hertz produces a slowly increasing response of second-order neurons in the spinal cord.

  4. Conditioned pain modulation [Baseline]

    A routinely used quantitative sensory testing protocol for the measurement of endogenous pain inhibition is conditioned pain modulation, which refers to the reduction in pain from one stimulus (the test stimulus) produced by the application of a second pain stimulus at a remote body site (the conditioning stimulus). Conditioned pain modulation is believed to reflect the perceptual manifestation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, whereby ascending projections from one noxious stimulus activate supraspinal structures that trigger descending inhibitory projections to the dorsal horn.

  5. C-reactive protein [One week follow up]

    A marker of systemic pro-inflammation

  6. Fibrinogen [One week follow up]

    A marker of systemic pro-inflammation

  7. Serum amyloid A [One week follow up]

    A marker of systemic pro-inflammation

  8. Vitamin D [One week follow up]

    hormone

  9. Oxytocin [One week follow up]

    Hormone

  10. Sleep quality [Between baseline and one week follow-up]

    Measured via actigraphy

  11. Self-reported disability [One week follow up]

    To be assessed with the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire. This measure is patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those with low back pain.

  12. Evoked pain with movement [One week follow up]

    Participants will complete a serious of movements including getting in and out of bed as well as lifting a crate from the ground to a tabletop. They will provide a rating from 0 - 100 indicating how painful it was to complete each movement (0 = no pain, 100 = most intense pain imaginable).

  13. Functional performance [One week follow up]

    Participants will complete the short physical performance battery. This assessment represents is a group of measures that combines the results of the gait speed, chair stand and balance tests.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Depressive symptoms [Baseline]

    Measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale

  2. Perceived injustice [Baseline]

    Measured using the Injustice Experiences Questionnaire

  3. Perceived discrimination [Baseline]

    Measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale

  4. Social support [Baseline]

    Measured using the Multidimensional Survey of Perceived Social Support Scale

  5. Psychological pain resilience [Baseline]

    Measured using the Psychological Pain Resilience Scale

  6. Dietary caffeine consumption [Between baseline and one week follow up]

    Measured using a daily diary of dietary intake across seven days

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
19 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Chronic low back pain that has been going on consistently for the last 6 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Surgery (fusion, Laminectomy) in the last year, accident or trauma in the last year, uncontrolled high blood pressure, heart disease, cancer, diabetes HbA1c > 7%, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Infection, Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Epilepsy, Stroke, Seizure (non-epileptic), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Fibromyalgia, Raynaud's disease, Major Depression/Bipolar Disorder, HIV

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 UAB Birmingham Alabama United States 35294

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Burel Goodin, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Psychology

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Burel Goodin, Principal Investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03338192
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • F170119003
  • R01MD010441
First Posted:
Nov 9, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Sep 22, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Burel Goodin, Principal Investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 22, 2021