ITAL-EE-REMS: Evaluation of Excellence in Italy's Residence for Execution of Security Measure
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The model of care for forensic psychiatry in Italy was changed by law (Law 81/2014) so that the six legacy secure forensic hospitals (Judicial Psychiatric Hospitals, OPG) were closed and new secure community residences for the execution of security measures (REMS) were opened in each of the 20 regions of Italy. This transition was in place by 2015. This observational study evaluates the health gains for patients both previously in OPGs and those admitted first to REMS. Health gains assessed include recovery measured by symptoms, function, need for therapeutic security and recovery of legal autonomy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
All those detained in REMS in the twelve month period 2019 to 2020 form the reference population. Samples are assessed for symptom severity (BPRS), global function (GAF), cognitive function (MMSE), risk and protective factors for violence (HCR-20, SAPROF), personality factors (PCL-R), measures of need for therapeutic security (DUNDRUM-1), treatment response relevant to violence and mental illness (DUNDRUM-3) and forensic recovery (DUNDRUM-4).
Outcome measures include violent and challenging behaviour (MOAS), length of stay, conditional (legal) discharge.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Therapeutic security assessment of residents in REMS for need for therapeutic security, treatment response relevant to forensic need and forensic recovery. |
Other: Treatment as usual (TAU)
the components of treatment as usual (TAU) are summarised and assessed by the items of the DUNDRUM-3: physical health, mental health, substance misuse, problem behaviours, self care and activities of daily living, education occupation and creativity, family and intimacy.
|
Risk Measures of Need (RISKMON) assessed symptom severity, risk and protective factors for violence, global function, personality factors. |
Other: Treatment as usual (TAU)
the components of treatment as usual (TAU) are summarised and assessed by the items of the DUNDRUM-3: physical health, mental health, substance misuse, problem behaviours, self care and activities of daily living, education occupation and creativity, family and intimacy.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- length of stay in REMS [date of admission to REMS through study completion, an average of 18 months]
time (days) from admission to move out of REMS
- Functional recovery [Date of first, second and third assessments in REMS through study completion, an average of 18 months]
change in GAF over time
- violence while in REMS [Date of first, second and third assessments in REMS through study completion, an average of 18 months]
MOAS in the intervals between first, second and third assessments in REMS an average of 18 months
- Readmission to REMS [date of discharge from REMS to date of readmission to REMS, if any.]
time (days) until readmission to REMS following discharge from REMS an average of 18 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
- conditional discharge [date of assessment to date of conditional discharge an average of 18 months]
time (days) from date of assessment to date of conditional discharge
Other Outcome Measures
- Death [from date of admission to date of death while in REMS, if any up to two years]
death while in REMS, if any
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
admitted to REMS
-
voluntarily consents to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- MMSE less than 19
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Bari | Bari | Italy | 70124 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Bari
- University of Dublin, Trinity College
Investigators
- Study Director: Felice F Carabellese, MD, University of Bari
- Principal Investigator: Lia Parente, PsyD, University of Bari
- Principal Investigator: Harry G Kennedy, MD, University of Dublin Trinity College (TCD)
- Principal Investigator: Mary Davoren, MD, University of Dublin Trinity College (TCD)
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Assessing the needs of patients in secure settings: a multi-disciplinary approach P Pierzchniak, F Farnham, N Taranto, D Bull, H Gill… - The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1999
- Carabellese F, Felthous AR, Rossetto I, La Tegola D, Franconi F, Catanesi R. Female Residents with Psychopathy in a High-Security Italian Hospital. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2018 Jun;46(2):171-178. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003744-18.
- Carabellese F, Felthous AR. Closing Italian Forensic Psychiatry Hospitals in Favor of Treating Insanity Acquittees in the Community. Behav Sci Law. 2016 Mar;34(2-3):444-59. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2234.
- Carabellese F, Parente L, Kennedy HG. Reform of Forensic Mental Health Services in Italy: Stigma and Blaming the Messenger: Hermenoia. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2022 Jul 21:306624X221113531. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221113531. Online ahead of print.
- Catanesi R, Mandarelli G, Ferracuti S, Valerio A, Carabellese F (2019). The new Italian residential forensic psychiatric system (REMS). A one-year population study. Italian Journal of Criminology - Special Number, Vol.13.
- Comportamento violento in una coorte di pazienti psichiatrici: rischio psicosociale e fattori protettivi F Carabellese, C Candelli, D La Tegola, R Buzzerio… - Rassegna italiana di criminologia, 2015
- Cura e controllo. Come cambia la pericolosità sociale psichiatrica R Catanesi, FF Carabellese, I Grattagliano - Giornale Italiano di Psicopatologia, 2009
- Flynn G, O'Neill C, McInerney C, Kennedy HG. The DUNDRUM-1 structured professional judgment for triage to appropriate levels of therapeutic security: retrospective-cohort validation study. BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Mar 16;11:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-43.
- Gualtieri G, Traverso S, Pozza A, Ferretti F, Carabellese F, Gusinu R, Coluccia A. Clinical risk management in High-Security Forensic Psychiatry Residences. Protecting patients and health professionals: perspectives and critical issues of the Law 81/2014. Clin Ter. 2020 Mar-Apr;171(2):e97-e100. doi: 10.7417/CT.2020.2196.
- Jeandarme I, Habets P, Kennedy H. Structured versus unstructured judgment: DUNDRUM-1 compared to court decisions. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 May 1.
- KENNEDY, H. G. 2002. Therapeutic uses of security: mapping forensic mental health services by stratifying risk. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8, 433-443.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.8.6.433
- Models of care in forensic psychiatry HG Kennedy - BJPsych Advances, 2022
- O'Neill C, Smith D, Caddow M, Duffy F, Hickey P, Fitzpatrick M, Caddow F, Cronin T, Joynt M, Azvee Z, Gallagher B, Kehoe C, Maddock C, O'Keeffe B, Brennan L, Davoren M, Owens E, Mullaney R, Keevans L, Maher R, Kennedy HG. STRESS-testing clinical activity and outcomes for a combined prison in-reach and court liaison service: a 3-year observational study of 6177 consecutive male remands. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Oct 11;10:67. doi: 10.1186/s13033-016-0097-z. eCollection 2016.
- OPG di chiusura: strumenti diagnostici per criminali malati di mente socialmente pericolosi. Dalla valutazione medico-psichiatrica al trattamento F Carabellese - Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia, 2017
- Williams HK, Senanayke M, Ross CC, Bates R, Davoren M. Security needs among patients referred for high secure care in Broadmoor Hospital England. BJPsych Open. 2020 Jun 2;6(4):e55. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.35.
- ITAL-EE-REMS