A-FREE ECMO: Anticoagulation-free VV ECMO for Acute Respiratory Failure

Sponsor
Damian Ratano (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04273607
Collaborator
PSI Foundation, Toronto, Ontario (Other)
40
1
2
21.9
1.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Currently international experts recommend therapeutic anticoagulation for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Reports and case series suggest that the absence of therapeutic anticoagulation is safe for VV-ECMO. No randomized control trials have assessed this. The aim of this pilot study is to assess safety and feasibility of an "anticoagulation-free strategy" for veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) in Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Subcutaneous Heparin
Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

Although anticoagulation targets and monitoring strategies vary around the world, the current practice is still to anticoagulate patients on ECMO, mostly with UFH. However, the use of heparin coated circuits has changed their thrombogenicity. Preliminary data suggest that a low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) strategy is non-inferior to a therapeutic dose UFH. Indeed, in daily practice, when a patient on ECMO has severe bleeding complications, UFH is often stopped until the hemorrhagic issue is under control, sometimes for days. This has led some to hypothesize that anticoagulation might not be necessary for VV-ECMO, and a few case series report little to no increase in adverse events as a result. There are currently no randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulation to no anticoagulation for patients supported with ECMO. Anticoagulation is, for physiological reasons, less necessary during VV-ECMO than VA-ECMO and this is the reason why our pilot study will focus on VV-ECMO only. Whereas the whole ECMO device is identical for both configurations, the risk of systemic embolization (e.g., stroke) and its severe complications is much higher in VA-ECMO where blood is reinjected directly into the systemic arterial system. Moreover, in the presence of severely decreased left ventricular function requiring VA-ECMO, the risk of left ventricular thrombus is very high and requires anticoagulation. During VV-ECMO, the risk of systemic embolization is low because the whole circuit is on the right side of the heart and relatively preserved biventricular function is needed to perform VV-ECMO

The hypothesis is that VV-ECMO is safe and feasible without therapeutic anticoagulation for adults with ARDS.

The objectives of this study is to assess, through a pilot study, the safety and feasibility of an "anticoagulation free strategy" for veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) in acute respiratory failure

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Anticoagulation-free VV ECMO for Acute Respiratory Failure: A Pilot Safety and Feasibility Randomized Clinical Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: No anticoagulation

Participants in this arm will not receive unfractionated heparin during the course of ECMO. They will receive standard venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with subcutaneous enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin

Drug: Subcutaneous Heparin
The intervention group will receive prophylactic heparin instead of standard of care therapeutic intravenous heparin
Other Names:
  • Enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin
  • No Intervention: Anticoagulation, ECMO standard of care

    Participants in this arm will receive the standard of care anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin during the course of ECMO.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. ECMO associated thrombotic complications [through ECMO completion, an average of 14 days]

      Composite outcome of: ECMO membrane oxygenator function assessed by trans-membrane pressure drop (> 10mmHg/l/min) and a membrane PaO2/FiO2 ratio (< 200mmHg) Need to change ECMO circuit due to clotting or dysfunction Platelets drop >50% in 24 hours and <50 /mm3 Development of a clinically significant thromboembolic event Clinical deep vein thrombosis, clinically suspected and confirmed by ultrasound Acute ischemic stroke, clinically suspected and confirmed by head-CT

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Hemorrhagic complications [through ECMO completion, an average of 14 days]

      Hemorrhagic complications assessed and adapted as per Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type 0: No bleeding Type 1: Bleeding requiring transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) or reduction of UFH Type 2: Bleeding requiring transfusion of PRBC and reduction of UFH Type 3: Life-threatening bleeding requiring, transfusion of PRBC, surgical intervention or discontinuation of ECMO Type 4: Any fatal bleeding

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Increase in d-dimer levels [through ECMO completion, an average of 14 days]

      D-dimers level (>5000ng/ml or >50% increase in 24 h) Need for transfusion of blood and blood-derived products related or not to a bleeding event Coagulation parameters during the ECMO period Amount of clot and fibrin visualized in the pre- and post-membrane side of the oxygenator daily (visual assessment) and after ECMO removal (assessed by a photographic quantification method).

    2. Transfusion of blood and blood-derived products related or not to a bleeding event [through ECMO completion, an average of 14 days]

      Amount of blood products transfused to patients in each groups during the course of ECMO

    3. Coagulation parameters on ECMO [through ECMO completion, an average of 14 days]

      Evaluation of fibrinogen (g/l), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT, seconds), prothrombin time (PT, seconds), thromboelastogram (if available), activated clotting time (ACT, seconds; if available)

    4. Amount of clot and fibrin visualized in the pre- and post-membrane side [through ECMO completion, an average of 14 days]

      Pragmatic quantification of clot visualized on both sides of the oxygenator by direct evaluation and by a photographic quantification method

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Adult patient with ARDS on VV-ECMO
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Contraindication to anticoagulation with UFH (known heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, active hemorrhage, any surgery precluding the use of anticoagulation),

    • Indication for therapeutic anticoagulation (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis, chronic anticoagulation therapy before ECMO insertion)

    • Low-flow (<2 liters/min) VV-ECMO (ECCO2R)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Toronto General Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada M5G 2N2

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Damian Ratano
    • PSI Foundation, Toronto, Ontario

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Damian Ratano, MD, University Health Network, Toronto
    • Principal Investigator: Eddy Fan, MD, PhD, University Health Network, Toronto

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Damian Ratano, Principal Investigator, University Health Network, Toronto
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04273607
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 19-5692.0
    First Posted:
    Feb 18, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 24, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Damian Ratano, Principal Investigator, University Health Network, Toronto
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 24, 2022