The Brain Stimulation and Physical Therapy Study

Sponsor
Hebrew SeniorLife (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04181658
Collaborator
(none)
10
1
2
18.3
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This pilot work will determine the feasibility of tDCS intervention as an effective adjunct intervention to PT aimed at improving gait, balance, and mobility in older adults at risk of falling.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Real tDCS and Physical Therapy
  • Other: Sham stimulation and Physical Therapy
N/A

Detailed Description

Falls are correlated with both physical and cognitive declines in older adults. Recurrent fallers and those at high risk of falls are often referred to physical therapy (PT) for gait and balance training. Although physical therapists are aware of the importance of cortical control of gait and balance, there is no available tool to directly yet non-invasively intervene brain in the clinical setting.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive and safe mean of modulating the excitability of specific brain regions and their connected neural networks. Our group and others have shown that tDCS intervention designed to facilitate the excitability of the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) improves numerous aspects of executive function related to mobility in older adults. However, no studies to date have assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of applying tDCS as an adjunct to PT to improve gait and balance within the geriatric rehabilitation setting.

This study aims to 1) assess the feasibility of implementing tDCS prior to each of their first 10 PT sessions, and 2) gather estimates of variability in outcomes related to gait, balance, cognition, and quality of life over time within older adults referred to PT for recurrent falls.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Feasibility and Effectiveness of Combining Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Physical Therapy to Improve Gait and Balance in Older Adults at Risk of Falling
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 22, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Real tDCS and Physical Therapy

This arm combines tDCS and Physical Therapy intervention. The real tDCS will be delivered before each physical therapy visit for up to 10 combined sessions. The tDCS montage was designed to target the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for around 20 minutes. The direct current delivered by any electrode will not exceed 2.0 milliamp(mA) and the total amount of current from all electrodes will not exceed 4 mA.

Other: Real tDCS and Physical Therapy
The participant will receive 20-minute sessions of real tDCS before each physical therapy visit for up to 10 combined sessions, over approximately 6 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Real tDCS + PT
  • Sham Comparator: Sham stimulation and Physical Therapy

    This arm combines sham stimulation and Physical Therapy intervention. The sham stimulation will be delivered before each physical therapy visit for up to 10 combined sessions. We will use an active sham stimulation in which very low-level currents (0.5 mA total) will be transferred between electrodes in close proximity on the scalp throughout the entire 20-minute session. This montage was designed to deliver currents not significantly influence their cortical tissue, but still, mimic the cutaneous sensations induced by tDCS over the same brain site (i.e. left DLPFC).

    Other: Sham stimulation and Physical Therapy
    The participant will receive 20-minute sessions of sham stimulation before each physical therapy visit for up to 10 combined sessions, over approximately 6 weeks.
    Other Names:
  • Sham stimulation + PT
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Screening to enrollment ratio (%, 0-100, higher ratio means a better outcome) [The whole data collection period (~ 6 months for the whole study)]

      The number of screenings needed to enroll one participant

    2. Intervention adherence rate (%, 0-100, higher ratio means a better outcome) [The whole data collection period (~ 6 months for the whole study)]

      Number of tDCS sessions completed

    3. Adherence rate (%, 0-100, higher ratio means a better outcome) [The whole data collection period (~ 6 months for the whole study)]

      The portion of enrolled participants who complete and adhere to the intervention who complete and adhere to the intervention

    4. Side effects [The whole data collection period (~ 6 months for the whole study)]

      The number, type, severity and duration of reported side effects

    5. Change from baseline in the dual task cost to gait speed (reduced dual task cost after intervention means a better outcome) [Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)]

      The change from baseline in the degree to which performing a secondary cognitive task diminishes gait speed

    6. Change from baseline in the dual task cost to standing postural sway speed (reduced dual task cost after intervention means a better outcome) [Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)]

      The change from baseline in the degree to which performing a secondary cognitive task diminishes the control of standing posture.

    7. Change from baseline in Trail Making Test B - A (reduced time after intervention means a better outcome) [Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)]

      The change from baseline in cognitive executive function

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change from baseline in gait speed (increased value after intervention means a better outcome) [Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)]

      The change from baseline in gait speed

    2. Change from baseline in gait variability (reduced value after intervention means a better outcome) [Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)]

      The change from baseline in gait speed

    3. Change from baseline in gradual-onset continuous performance test (gradCPT) ( increased accuracy after intervention means a better outcome) [Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)]

      The change from baseline in cognitive sustained attention

    4. Change from baseline in Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) (reduced time after intervention means a better outcome) [Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)]

      The change from baseline in overall mobility function

    5. Change from baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score (increased score after intervention means a better outcome) [Before and after the intervention (~ 6 weeks per participant)]

      The change from baseline in global cognitive function

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    65 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Ages 65 years old and above

    • Admitted to Physical Therapy for gait and balance training due to the high risk of falls

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Inability to stand or walk unassisted for 60 seconds

    • Severe cognitive impairment defined as a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score < 18

    • Any unstable medical condition

    • Any unstable psychiatric co-morbidity including major depressive disorder, schizophrenia or psychosis

    • Active cancer for which chemo/radiation therapy id being received

    • Significant vision and hearing problems that cannot be corrected with visual and hearing aids

    • Contraindications to tDCS, including seizure within the past two years, use of neuro-active drugs, the risk of metal objects in the brain, implanted medical devices, or the presence of dermatological conditions such as eczema on the scalp.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hebrew Rehabilitation Center Boston Massachusetts United States 02131

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Hebrew SeniorLife

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: On-Yee Lo, PhD, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Hebrew SeniorLife
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04181658
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IRB-2019-24
    First Posted:
    Nov 29, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 5, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 5, 2021