False/Negative Rate of Lung Percutaneous Needle Biopsy

Sponsor
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00638352
Collaborator
(none)
5
1
46
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Needle biopsy is a way of determining whether a lung mass is cancerous or benign. Its accuracy was established by research in which patients underwent fine needle aspiration, a kind of needle biopsy that yields samples for cytology (similar to the way a pap smear or a fluid sample would be evaluated for malignant cells). This kind of needle biopsy may supplemented or replaced by core needle biopsy, which yields samples for histology (similar to surgical tissue samples but on a smaller scale) rather than for cytology. Core needle biopsy is believed to be helpful particularly in obtaining a diagnosis in patients who have a lung mass that their doctors think is cancerous but is, in fact, benign. In spite of the advances in needle biopsy, however, there are patients who do receive a pathology report indicating no evidence of cancer but whose lung mass actually is cancerous. The fraction of such patients, among all patients who have no evidence of cancer according to the biopsy, is called the "false negative rate." It is approximately 25% for needle biopsies that consist of fine needle aspiration alone. The false negative rate for needle biopsies that include core biopsy samples is not known.

We want to examine the accuracy of needle biopsy in patients who had core samples taken from a lung mass in addition to, or in place of, fine needle aspiration. In this study we will focus on such patients who had no evidence of cancer according to the biopsy, to determine how many actually had a cancer that was missed by the biopsy. To accomplish this goal, we will need to review the medical records of these patients for one of two things: either a definitive diagnosis of the lung mass by some other means (for example, surgical biopsy), or by seeing how the patient does over a period of time (usually in conjunction with medical imaging tests such as chest x-rays or chest CT scans). To establish that a lung mass is benign by observing a patient over time, it is necessary to show that the lung mass disappears, becomes smaller, or remains unchanged in size for 2 years.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

    Detailed Description

    We will review medical records to identify patients who underwent percutaneous needle biopsy of a lung mass between 5/1/01 and 10/30/04. If the pathology report indicates that the biopsy showed no evidence of malignancy, we will examine the medical record for a "gold standard" diagnosis of the lesion in question, including the pathology result from a surgical resection or a repeat biopsy, imaging follow-up demonstrating regression of the lesion or size stability for at least 2 years, or clinical follow-up for at least 2 years with no clinical evidence of malignant disease. If this information is not available in the University Hospital medical record, we will contact the patient to obtain consent for follow-up using external sources (physician records, imaging studies, pathology reports).

    We will derive descriptive statistics (prevalence of malignancy, sensitivity, specificity, and false negative rates). The overall sample size will be ~500 patients who had PTNB of a lung mass within the study period. Approximately 80 are expected to have a biopsy result showing no evidence of malignancy, based on a retrospective review performed under an IRB exemption (87-04, letter dated 9/28/04). The expected proportion of cases with no evidence of malignancy is approximately 0.15. For a 95% confidence interval of 0.15+/-0.075 we will need follow-up information from 61 patients, considering that this is a descriptive study with a dichotomous variable. This gives us a margin for patients who will be lost to follow-up

    Study Design

    Study Type:
    Observational
    Actual Enrollment :
    5 participants
    Observational Model:
    Cohort
    Time Perspective:
    Retrospective
    Official Title:
    Determination of the False Negative Rate of Percutaneous Needle Biopsies That Include Core Tissue Samples
    Study Start Date :
    Jun 1, 2006
    Actual Primary Completion Date :
    Mar 1, 2010
    Actual Study Completion Date :
    Apr 1, 2010

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. The primary objective is to determine the false negative rate of PTNB procedures that include core tissue samples, and to compare it to the historical false negative rate of PTNB with FNA only. [2 years]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. To determine the sensitivity of PTNB procedures that include at least one core tissue sample, for the diagnosis of malignancy. [2 years]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • subjects who underwent percutaneous needle biopsy of a lung mass during the study period of 5/1/01 to 10/30/04
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • subjects will be excluded if at least one core sample was not obtained in the course of the biopsy.

    • subjects who had a pathology sample read as "insufficient for diagnosis"

    • subjects who underwent needle biopsy only for infection, to identify a causative organism

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 SUNY Upstate Medical University Syracuse New York United States 13210

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Ernest Scalzetti, MD, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Ernest Scalzetti, MD, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00638352
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • SUNYUMU 5334
    First Posted:
    Mar 19, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 18, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2016
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Ernest Scalzetti, MD, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 18, 2016