Feasibility of Pulsed Field Ablation Under Mild Conscious Sedation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Prospective case-control study comparing pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation under mild conscious sedation vs standard of care (general anaesthesia).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
This study will prospectively assess 40 patients (20 per arm). Those in the general anaesthesia arm will undergo routine clinical practice. Those in the mild conscious sedation arm will undergo pulsed field ablation with intravenous sedation but without general anaesthesia, though conversion to general anaesthesia is allowed if the patient does not tolerate the procedure.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Pulsed Field Ablation - General Anaesthesia Patients undergoing pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation under general anaesthetic. |
Procedure: Catheter ablation
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
|
Pulsed Field Ablation - Mild Conscious Sedation Patients undergoing pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation under mild conscious sedation. |
Procedure: Catheter ablation
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number and Percentage of Patients Converting to General Anaesthesia in the Conscious Sedation Arm [Intraprocedural]
Requirement for conversion to general anaesthesia from mild conscious sedation
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Patient experience (Pain; Relative) [Intraprocedural]
5 point Likert scale for pain during the procedure, 1 = much worse than expected, 5 = much better than expected
- Patient experience (Discomfort; Relative) [Intraprocedural]
5 point Likert scale for discomfort (for example, thumping, heart racing, muscle twitching) during the procedure, 1 = much worse than expected, 5 = much better than expected
- Patient experience (Anxiety; Relative) [Intraprocedural]
5 point Likert scale for anxiety during the procedure, 1 = much worse than expected, 5 = much better than expected
- Patient experience (Pain; Absolute) [Intraprocedural]
Visual analogue score for pain during the procedure (1-100, 1 = none, 100 = worst imaginable)
- Patient experience (Discomfort; Absolute) [Intraprocedural]
Visual analogue score for discomfort (for example thumping, heart racing, muscle twitching) during the procedure (1-100, 1 = none, 100 = worst imaginable)
- Patient experience (Anxiety; Absolute) [Intraprocedural]
Visual analogue score anxiety during the procedure (1-100, 1 = none, 100 = worst imaginable)
- Post-operative discomfort (Visual analogue score) [Immediately after the procedure]
Visual analogue scores for sites post-operative discomfort (groin, chest, throat), (1-100, 1 = none, 100 = worst imaginable)
- Friends and family test [Immediately after the procedure]
Would the patient recommend the procedure to a friend or family member with the same condition? (5 point Likert scale, 1 = definitely not, 5 = definitely)
- Acute procedural success [Immediately after the procedure]
Were all pulmonary veins isolated at procedure end?
- Procedure Duration [During procedure]
Skin-to-skin time - i.e. from first needle insertion to withdrawal of sheaths
- Fluoroscopy Duration [During procedure]
Time spent with x-ray active
- Left atrial dwell time [During procedure]
Time spent with catheters inside the left atrium
- Ablation Duration [During procedure]
Time from first ablation application to end of final ablation application
- Sedative and anaesthetic drug doses [During procedure]
Doses of sedatives, analgesics and anaesthetics administered during the procedure
- Acute Procedural Complications [Immediately after the procedure]
Whether any complications occurred
- Same-day discharge rates [24 hours]
How many patients per arm went home on the same day as their procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients clinically referred for and undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using pulsed field ablation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital | Liverpool | United Kingdom |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Investigators
- Study Chair: Dhiraj Gupta, MD, Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- PFA-Sedation-Study
- IRAS