CardioSwitch: Feasibility of Switching Fluoropyrimidine Due to Cardiotoxicity Study
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate cardiotoxicity during re-challenge of a different modality of fluoropyrimidine (primary end-point S-1 and secondary any other fluoropyrimidine) after having perceived cardiotoxicity with a fluoropyrimidine based regimen previously. The patient population is being treated for solid tumors.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Detailed Description
Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy agents, such as 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, are occasionally associated with cardiotoxicity that may manifest as chest pain, ECG alterations, cardiac arrhythmia, and rarely myocardial infarction and sudden death. Clinical fluoropyrimidine cardiotoxicity is infrequent (1-8% of patients), but subclinical toxicity may be much more common (up to one third of patients). The underlying mechanisms are not well understood, but they may include abnormal coronary artery contractility or spasm, and myocardial toxicity. Cardiotoxicity may be less frequent with S-1 (a combination of tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1) as compared with 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, but head-to-head comparisons are lacking.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that patients who have cardiotoxicity on other fluoropyrimidines may be successfully treated with S-1. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare different 5-fluorouracil-based dosing modalities and S-1, and compare cardiotoxicity during these treatments.
The patient population was treated for solid tumors with a 5-fluorouracil based regimen and had a cardiac event grade 1-4. All patients were re-challenged with a different fluoropyrimidine or S-1 and assessed for cardiotoxicity during re-challenge.
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Recurrence of fluoropyrimidine related cardiac toxicity after switch to S-1 based treatment [After switch to and during one line of S-1 based chemotherapy (average 6 months)]
Cardiac tolerability according to NCI-CTCAE following cardiotoxicity initiated switch of fluoropyrimidine to S-1
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Recurrence of fluoropyrimidine related cardiac toxicity after switch to any fluoropyrimidine [After switch to and during one line of another fluoropyrimidine regimen (average 6 months)]
Cardiac tolerability according to NCI-CTCAE following cardiotoxicity initiated switch of fluoropyrimidine to another fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy
- Cardiac symptoms during fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy [During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)]
Frequency and severity according to NCI-CTCAE of cardiac symptoms during different fluoropyrimidines and the correlation with other added cytotoxics or biologics
- Diagnostic work-up [During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)]
Diagnostic work-up for cardiotoxicity in real world data
- Time-lines for cardiotoxicity [During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)]
Time-lines for appearance of cardiotoxicity during fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy
- Dose-intensity [During one cycle (average 3 weeks) of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy causing cardiac toxicity]
Dose-intensity of the therapy at the cycle causing cardiotoxicity
- Alteration in cardiac functional parameters during fluoropyrimidine treatment induced cardiotoxicity [During one cycle (average 3 weeks) of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy causing cardiac toxicity]
The alterations of (if evaluated), graded as normal, non-significant abnormalities or significant abnormalities.: ECG abnormalities Ejection fraction in % Coronary artery status on angiogram Cardiac arrhythmias in ECG, Holter or cardiac monitor registration Plasma troponin concentration and other cardiac enzymes and other laboratory tests as within reference range ro abnormal Serum alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL) concentration
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Solid tumor
-
Cardiotoxicity grade 1-4 during fluoropyrimidine-based treatment
-
Re-challenge with a different fluoropyrimidine-based therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
• Participation in a trial with experimental drugs
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Odense University Hospital | Odense | Denmark | ||
2 | Department of Oncology | Tampere | Pirkanmaa | Finland | 33520 |
3 | Helsinki University Central Hospital | Helsinki | Uusimaa | Finland | 00290 |
4 | Oulu university hospital | Oulu | Finland | ||
5 | Turku university hospital | Turku | Finland | ||
6 | Landspitali | Reykjavík | Iceland | ||
7 | St. Vincents University Hospital | Dublin | Ireland | ||
8 | Academic Medical Center | Amsterdam | Netherlands | ||
9 | Haukeland University Hospital | Bergen | Norway | ||
10 | Skone university hospital | Lund | Sweden | ||
11 | Karolinska University Hospital | Stockholm | Sweden | ||
12 | Sundsvall hospital | Sundsvall | Sweden | ||
13 | Uppsala academic hospital | Uppsala | Sweden |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Tampere University Hospital
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Deboever G, Hiltrop N, Cool M, Lambrecht G. Alternative treatment options in colorectal cancer patients with 5-fluorouracil- or capecitabine-induced cardiotoxicity. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2013 Mar;12(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 26. Review.
- Kwakman JJ, Simkens LH, Mol L, Kok WE, Koopman M, Punt CJ. Incidence of capecitabine-related cardiotoxicity in different treatment schedules of metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis of the CAIRO studies of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;76:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
- Kwakman JJM, Baars A, van Zweeden AA, de Mol P, Koopman M, Kok WEM, Punt CJA. Case series of patients treated with the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 after capecitabine-induced coronary artery vasospasm. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Aug;81:130-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
- Polk A, Vaage-Nilsen M, Vistisen K, Nielsen DL. Cardiotoxicity in cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine: a systematic review of incidence, manifestations and predisposing factors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Dec;39(8):974-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Apr 10. Review.
- Winther SB, Zubcevic K, Qvortrup C, Vestermark LW, Jensen HA, Krogh M, Sorbye H, Pfeiffer P; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare). Experience with S-1 in older Caucasian patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Findings from an observational chart review. Acta Oncol. 2016 Jul;55(7):881-5. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2016.1161825. Epub 2016 May 16.
- Ye JX, Liu AQ, Ge LY, Zhou SZ, Liang ZG. Effectiveness and safety profile of S-1-based chemotherapy compared with capecitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced gastric and colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2014 May;7(5):1271-1278. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
- Yeh ET, Bickford CL. Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: incidence, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 16;53(24):2231-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.050. Review.
- R18045