Feasibility Testing of a New Way to Support the Jaw During 3rd Molar Extractions
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Cross sectional observational study to assess the feasibility of using the functional prototype of the restful jaw support device to support the jaw when extracting mandibular 3rd molars using moderate/deep sedation. An additional meeting(s) will occur, after the oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMS) have completed all treatment procedures utilizing the device and surveys are completed, to provide feedback on how the device performed.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Cross sectional observational study assesses the feasibility of OMS and dental assistants using the jaw support device during mandibular 3rd molar extractions with moderate/deep sedation.
Patients presenting for surgical removal of 3rd molars will be invited to participate in the study at the time of their oral surgery consult. The OMS will determine if the patient meets eligibility criteria, explain the study and invite them to participate. At the time of 3rd molar removal, the OMS and their dental assistants will follow their standard procedures for obtaining consent from patients for 3rd molar removal with moderate/deep sedation. In addition, they will confirm the patient's interest to participate in the study, ask if they have any questions and obtain consent. A dental assistant will place the jaw support device and recheck the jaw support tightening mechanism once the positioning is comfortable for the patient. The dental assistant will recheck the jaw support tightening mechanism before the procedure begins.
The OMS will use their standard protocol for removal of the teeth. The only change will be that a dental assistant who typically stands behind the dental chair and supports the mandible with their hands and moves the jaw as indicated by the OMS will instead place and secure the device to support the jaw. A dental assistant standing behind the chair will be present at all times to readjust the device position as needed or remove the device as indicated. The default in the case of device malfunction is for the device to fall away from the patient and the dental assistant will be immediately available to take over supporting the patient's jaw with their hands, which is one of their standard responsibilities when the device is not used.
Both the OMS and any dental assistant(s) assisting in the procedure(s), when the device is utilized, will each complete a survey about their experience with the jaw support device once they have completed surgical removal with moderate/deep sedation of mandibular 3rd molars in 4 patients.
An additional meeting(s) will occur, after the OMS have completed all treatment procedures utilizing the device and surveys are completed, to provide feedback on how the device performed. This information will inform Phase II of this study, a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The feasibility will be assessed by query of the surgeons utilizing the device (questionnaire). This will be done after 4 patient experiences in conjunction with surgical procedure. [3-6 months]
Surgeons satisfaction with utilization of the device.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Is between 18 to 24 years of age.
-
Requires surgical removal of bilateral mandibular 3rd molars (concurrent maxillary 3rd molar extractions allowed).
-
Will consent to have 3rd molar surgical removal with the device supporting the mandible.
-
Indication for moderate/deep sedation and medically able to tolerate sedation.
-
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Category I (healthy patient) and Category II (patients with mild systemic disease).
Exclusion Criteria:
• Any condition or situation that the surgeon feels would prevent the patient from participating in the study.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | 55455 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Minnesota
- HealthPartners Institute
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Akhter R, Hassan NM, Ohkubo R, Tsukazaki T, Aida J, Morita M. The relationship between jaw injury, third molar removal, and orthodontic treatment and TMD symptoms in university students in Japan. J Orofac Pain. 2008 Winter;22(1):50-6.
- American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Parameters of care: Clinical and practice guidelines for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. 2012. Available at http://www.mfch.cz/doc/ParCare2012Complete.pdf
- Butler JH, Folke LE, Bandt CL. A descriptive survey of signs and symptoms associated with the myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome. J Am Dent Assoc. 1975 Mar;90(3):635-9.
- Fernandes P, Velly AM, Anderson GC. A randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of an external mandibular support device during dental care for patients with temporomandibular disorders. Gen Dent. 2013 Sep-Oct;61(6):26-31.
- Fricton JR, Kroening R, Haley D, Siegert R. Myofascial pain syndrome of the head and neck: a review of clinical characteristics of 164 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985 Dec;60(6):615-23.
- Friedman JW. The prophylactic extraction of third molars: a public health hazard. Am J Public Health. 2007 Sep;97(9):1554-9. Epub 2007 Jul 31.
- Huang GJ, Cunha-Cruz J, Rothen M, Spiekerman C, Drangsholt M, Anderson L, Roset GA. A prospective study of clinical outcomes related to third molar removal or retention. Am J Public Health. 2014 Apr;104(4):728-34. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301649. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
- Huang GJ, Drangsholt MT, Rue TC, Cruikshank DC, Hobson KA. Age and third molar extraction as risk factors for temporomandibular disorder. J Dent Res. 2008 Mar;87(3):283-7.
- Huang GJ, LeResche L, Critchlow CW, Martin MD, Drangsholt MT. Risk factors for diagnostic subgroups of painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD). J Dent Res. 2002 Apr;81(4):284-8.
- Huang GJ, Rue TC. Third-molar extraction as a risk factor for temporomandibular disorder. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Nov;137(11):1547-54.
- Humphrey SP, Lindroth JE, Carlson CR. Routine dental care in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2002 Spring;16(2):129-34.
- Juhl GI, Jensen TS, Norholt SE, Svensson P. Incidence of symptoms and signs of TMD following third molar surgery: a controlled, prospective study. J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Mar;36(3):199-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01925.x.
- LeResche L, Mancl LA, Drangsholt MT, Huang G, Von Korff M. Predictors of onset of facial pain and temporomandibular disorders in early adolescence. Pain. 2007 Jun;129(3):269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
- Okeson JP. Bell's orofacial pains: The clinical management of orofacial pain, sixth edition. Vol 6. Illinois: Quintessence Publishing; 2005.
- Plesh O, Gansky SA, Curtis DA, Pogrel MA. The relationship between chronic facial pain and a history of trauma and surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Jul;88(1):16-21.
- Pullinger AG, Monteiro AA. History factors associated with symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 1988 Mar;15(2):117-24.
- Sahebi S, Moazami F, Afsa M, Nabavi Zade MR. Effect of lengthy root canal therapy sessions on temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2010 Summer;4(3):95-7. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
- Velly AM, Gornitsky M, Philippe P. Contributing factors to chronic myofascial pain: a case-control study. Pain. 2003 Aug;104(3):491-499. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00074-5.
- Zucuskie T. A controlled clinical trial of the usefulness of an external mandibular support device during routine dental care. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota; 1996.
- 2854