Dose Response Curve - Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence

Sponsor
University of Aarhus (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01130870
Collaborator
(none)
19
1
3
14
1.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if subsensory stimulation (amplitude) will maintain same continence in patients treated with Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS) for faecal incontinence as stimulation with amplitude at sensory threshold.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Sensory Threshold
  • Device: 75% of sensory threshold - Amplitude
  • Device: 50% of sensory threshold - Amplitude
N/A

Detailed Description

Faecal incontinence is a devastating condition with huge impact on quality of life. Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS) has since 1995 been a treatment option for patients not obtaining satisfactory continence result with standard non-surgical treatments. SNS is electrical stimulation of the sacral nerve root(s2,3 or 4). Stimulation of this nerve roots results in improved continence. The mechanism of action is at present not well described.

Standard the neuromodulator (pacemaker) stimulate with Frequency 14 Hz, pulse width 210 mic.sec. and amplitude set at sensory threshold. One study by SM. Koch et all confirms that subsensory stimulation can be effective. At present there is no doubled blinded study's to confirm this theory of effective sub sensory stimulation.

The aim of this study is to determine if subsensory stimulation will be as effective as stimulation with amplitude at sensory threshold. This will be investigated in 20 patients who have had at least a reduction in incontinence episodes or Wexner inc. score of 75 % between preimplantation and latest follow up. The patients will be randomized to three different amplitudes. 1: amplitude set at sensory threshold. 2: 75% of sensory threshold. 3: 50% of sensory threshold. The order of the three settings will be random and in a double blinded manner. The interval between these three pacemaker settings is four weeks. Patients serve as there own controls. Stimulation frequency (14 Hz) and pulse width (210 mic-sec) will remain fixed.

Evaluation will be by means of 4 week bowel habit diary and questionnaires (Wexner inc. score / St. Marks Score / Wexner constipation score / Altomares OD-score / IBS-score/ Rockwood FIQoL -score). All patients will be evaluated with anorectal measurements (sphincter strength and anorectal volume measurements) before any changes of stimulation amplitude.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
19 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Dose Response Curve - Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2011
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Sensory threshold - Amplitude

Stimulation amplitude set at sensory threshold.

Device: Sensory Threshold
Sacral nerve stimulation with amplitude (sensory threshold), Frequency 14 Hz and pulse width 210 mic.sec.

Experimental: 25% below sensory threshold - Amplitude

Stimulation amplitude 75% of sensory threshold.

Device: 75% of sensory threshold - Amplitude
Sacral nerve stimulation with amplitude (75% of sensory threshold), Frequency 14 Hz and pulse width 210 mic.sec.

Experimental: 50% below sensory threshold - Amplitude

Stimulation with amplitude set 50% below sensory threshold

Device: 50% of sensory threshold - Amplitude
Sacral nerve stimulation with amplitude (50% of sensory threshold), Frequency 14 Hz and pulse width 210 mic.sec.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of incontinence episodes Assess number of incontinence episodes. [Will be assessed every four weeks during a twelve-week period]

    Assess number of incontinence episodes, by means of bowel habit diary. Four week bowel habit diary will be evaluated three times during the twelve-week protocol perioed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Assess changes in anorectal volume and pressure with different amplitude. [Will be assessed every four weeks during a twelve-week period]

    Resting and maximal anal sphincter pressure will be measured with different amplitude settings. In total three evaluations will be made in the twelve week protocol perioed.

  2. Assess Quality of life after decrease in stimulation amplitude. [Will be assessed every four weeks during a twelve-week period]

    Quality of life will be recorded by means of Rockwood faecal incontinence quality of life score. A total of three evaluations will be made every fourth week in the twelve week protocol perioed.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • 18 years or older

  • Informed consent

  • Idiopathic fecal incontinence or Fecal incontinence due to small sphincter defect(≤60

  • fecal incontinence after primary/secondary sphincter repair

  • Permanent neuromodulator (medtronic InterStim / Interstim II) implanted for at least 12 weeks before entering the study.

  • Reduction in fecal incontinence episodes of at least 75% between baseline and latest follow up.(Bowel diary card) or 75% reduction of Wexner Inc. score.

  • Willing and competent to fill out diary cards

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Colorectal/proctological surgery since IPG-implant

  • Pregnancy

  • Anorectal Pain

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Anal Physiology Laboratory, Surgical Research Section 900, Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Aarhus C Denmark 8000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Aarhus

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University of Aarhus
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01130870
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 002
  • 002
First Posted:
May 26, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Nov 10, 2011
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2011
Keywords provided by University of Aarhus
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 10, 2011