The Use of an "Anal-Tape" in Patients With Fecal Incontinence
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Fecal incontinence (FI), defined as the involuntary passage of stool for more than 3 months and is a devastating disease. The negative impact on quality of life has been consistently demonstrated. The prevalence of FI is probably underestimated in most studies. Currently conservative treatment is only modestly effective and surgical treatment is complex and expensive with less than optimal efficacy.
The investigators developed an "anal tape" using a commercially available elastic band with a special adhesive that is approved for use in the skin. A special design of the tape can be applied to the skin surrounding the anus providing support and additional pressure forces to the anal sphincter.
This is a 4 week, prospective, non blinded, cross-over study to explore the efficacy and safety of this device in patients with FI. The primary endpoint will be improvement in quality of life.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Off treatment 2 week period without intervention |
|
Experimental: Treatment period 2 week period with intervention |
Device: Anal Tape
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Any Improvment in the Fecal Incontince Quality of Life Scale (FIQoLs) [2 weeks]
The FIQoL is a validated, condition-specific tool that evaluates quality of life (QoL) in patients with fecal incontinence (FI) it consisting of 29 questions, subdivided into four domains: Lifestyle, Coping/Behavior, Depression/Self-perception, and Embarrassment. Item 1, general health, is graded from 1 "excellent" to 5 "poor" and is reversely scored. Items 2 to 28 are graded on a 4-point Likert-scale (1 = lower QoL). Item 29, FI specific depression, is graded from 1 "extremely so" to 6 "not at all." The average score for each domain is calculated separately and is calculated only if half or more of the items in the particular domain have been answered. Scales range from 1 to 5, with a 1 indicating a lower quality of life. Each domain or subscale is reported separately (Range 1 to 5), a total score including all four domains is not calculated.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- A 50% Reduction in the Number of Episodes of FI Per Week [4 weeks]
Number of pateints with reduction of more than 50% in the absolute number of FI events during each week of the study
- Mean Wexner Score [2 weeks]
The Wexner Scale is a measure of frequency and severity of anal incontinence. It comprises five items, three regarding frequency of involuntary passage of gas, liquid, or solid stool, frequency of pad wearing, and frequency of lifestyle alteration, scored in a 5-point Likert-scale (never=0, rarely=1, sometimes=2, usually=3, always=4). A sum of all scores from 0 to 20 is calculated with higher scores meaning more severe incontince.
- Mean Redction in Wexner Scale Compared to Baseline [2 weeks]
The Wexner Scale is a measure of frequency and severity of anal incontinence. It comprises five items, three regarding frequency of involuntary passage of gas, liquid, or solid stool, frequency of pad wearing, and frequency of lifestyle alteration, scored in a 5-point Likert-scale (never=0, rarely=1, sometimes=2, usually=3, always=4). A sum of all scores from 0 to 20 is calculated with higher scores meaning more severe incontince.
- General Satisfaction [2 weeks]
General satisfaction with the device was assessed using a standard 100 mm visual analog scale. Patients were asked to grade their satisfaction with the device between 0 and 100 by drawing a perpendicular line in the 100 mm visual analog scale. Then the distance in mm was measured in mm from 0 to the perpendicular line and the score was calculated. Higher scores meaning better satisfaction.
- Willingness of the Patient to Continue Using the Anal Tape After the Study. [4 weeks]
Willingness of the patient to continue using the device was assessed using a standard 100 mm visual analog scale. Patients were asked to grade their willingness to use the device in the future between 0 and 100 by drawing a perpendicular line in the 100 mm visual analog scale. Then the distance in mm was measured in mm from 0 to the perpendicular line and the score was calculated. Higher scores meaning better satisfaction.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
18 years old
-
Fecal incontinence for more than 6 months
-
Willing to participate
-
Understand the study procedures
-
Is able to apply and remove the "anal tape" without significant assistance of others.
-
Have done sigmoidsocopy or colonoscopy and anal manometry within five year of screening visit
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Advanced full thickness rectal prolapse.
-
Injured, inflamed or any significant disease in the peri-anal skin.
-
Allergy to any component of the device, either known or developed during testing in the screening visit.
-
Moderate to severe proctitis of any etiology.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- Shaare Zedek Medical Center FI
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Per Sequence |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Off treatment first for 14 days Treatment period second for 14 days |
Period Title: Control Period - no Intervention | |
STARTED | 20 |
COMPLETED | 20 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Period Title: Control Period - no Intervention | |
STARTED | 20 |
COMPLETED | 20 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | All Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 2 week period without intervention then 2 week period with anal tape intervention |
Overall Participants | 20 |
Age (years) [Median (Full Range) ] | |
Median (Full Range) [years] |
64
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
20
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
Asian |
0
0%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
0
0%
|
White |
0
0%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
20
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Any Improvment in the Fecal Incontince Quality of Life Scale (FIQoLs) |
---|---|
Description | The FIQoL is a validated, condition-specific tool that evaluates quality of life (QoL) in patients with fecal incontinence (FI) it consisting of 29 questions, subdivided into four domains: Lifestyle, Coping/Behavior, Depression/Self-perception, and Embarrassment. Item 1, general health, is graded from 1 "excellent" to 5 "poor" and is reversely scored. Items 2 to 28 are graded on a 4-point Likert-scale (1 = lower QoL). Item 29, FI specific depression, is graded from 1 "extremely so" to 6 "not at all." The average score for each domain is calculated separately and is calculated only if half or more of the items in the particular domain have been answered. Scales range from 1 to 5, with a 1 indicating a lower quality of life. Each domain or subscale is reported separately (Range 1 to 5), a total score including all four domains is not calculated. |
Time Frame | 2 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Off Treatment | Treatment Period |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 2 week period without intervention | 2 week period with intervention - Anal tape |
Measure Participants | 20 | 20 |
Lifestyle |
2.8
(0.69)
|
3.3
(0.68)
|
Coping/Behaivoir |
1.9
(0.64)
|
2.5
(0.73)
|
Depression/Self-Perception |
3.1
(0.75)
|
3.5
(0.74)
|
Embarrassment |
2.13
(0.67)
|
2.65
(0.76)
|
Title | A 50% Reduction in the Number of Episodes of FI Per Week |
---|---|
Description | Number of pateints with reduction of more than 50% in the absolute number of FI events during each week of the study |
Time Frame | 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Note that this outcome was obtained by free text stool diaries that patients had to keep at home. Only 15 patient out of 20 provided full diaries, therefore the analysis is limited to 15 instead of all 20. |
Arm/Group Title | Off Treatment | Treatment Period |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 2 week period without intervention | 2 week period with intervention Anal Tape |
Measure Participants | 15 | 15 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
0
0%
|
5
NaN
|
Title | Mean Wexner Score |
---|---|
Description | The Wexner Scale is a measure of frequency and severity of anal incontinence. It comprises five items, three regarding frequency of involuntary passage of gas, liquid, or solid stool, frequency of pad wearing, and frequency of lifestyle alteration, scored in a 5-point Likert-scale (never=0, rarely=1, sometimes=2, usually=3, always=4). A sum of all scores from 0 to 20 is calculated with higher scores meaning more severe incontince. |
Time Frame | 2 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Off Treatment | Treatment Period |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 2 week period without intervention | 2 week period with intervention Anal Tape |
Measure Participants | 20 | 20 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
11.9
(3.5)
|
10.3
(4.8)
|
Title | Mean Redction in Wexner Scale Compared to Baseline |
---|---|
Description | The Wexner Scale is a measure of frequency and severity of anal incontinence. It comprises five items, three regarding frequency of involuntary passage of gas, liquid, or solid stool, frequency of pad wearing, and frequency of lifestyle alteration, scored in a 5-point Likert-scale (never=0, rarely=1, sometimes=2, usually=3, always=4). A sum of all scores from 0 to 20 is calculated with higher scores meaning more severe incontince. |
Time Frame | 2 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Off Treatment | Treatment Period |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 2 week period without intervention | 2 week period with intervention Anal Tape |
Measure Participants | 20 | 20 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
0.6
(1.7)
|
1.95
(4.2)
|
Title | General Satisfaction |
---|---|
Description | General satisfaction with the device was assessed using a standard 100 mm visual analog scale. Patients were asked to grade their satisfaction with the device between 0 and 100 by drawing a perpendicular line in the 100 mm visual analog scale. Then the distance in mm was measured in mm from 0 to the perpendicular line and the score was calculated. Higher scores meaning better satisfaction. |
Time Frame | 2 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Note that in 3 patients these data were missing, therefore the analysis if for 17 out of 20 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Treatment Period |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 2 week period with intervention Anal Tape |
Measure Participants | 17 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm in VAS scale] |
80
|
Title | Willingness of the Patient to Continue Using the Anal Tape After the Study. |
---|---|
Description | Willingness of the patient to continue using the device was assessed using a standard 100 mm visual analog scale. Patients were asked to grade their willingness to use the device in the future between 0 and 100 by drawing a perpendicular line in the 100 mm visual analog scale. Then the distance in mm was measured in mm from 0 to the perpendicular line and the score was calculated. Higher scores meaning better satisfaction. |
Time Frame | 4 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Note that in 3 patients these data were missing, therefore the analysis if for 17 out of 20 participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Treatment Period |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | 2 week period with intervention Anal Tape |
Measure Participants | 17 |
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [mm in VAS scale] |
90
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 4 weeks study period | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Control Period - No Intervention | Treatment Period - Anal Tape Provided | ||
Arm/Group Description | Consiting of the first 14 days of the study during which patients were off treatment and baseline and safety data was collected | Consiting of the second 14 days of the study (day 15 to 28) during which patients were provided with the "anal tape" device and during this period efficacy and safety data was collected. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Control Period - No Intervention | Treatment Period - Anal Tape Provided | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/20 (0%) | 0/20 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Control Period - No Intervention | Treatment Period - Anal Tape Provided | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/20 (0%) | 0/20 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Control Period - No Intervention | Treatment Period - Anal Tape Provided | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/20 (0%) | 3/20 (15%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Mild difficulty to remove the device | 0/20 (0%) | 0 | 3/20 (15%) | 3 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Dan Livovsky |
---|---|
Organization | Shaare Zedek Medical Center |
Phone | +972525622398 |
danlivo@szmc.org.il |
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center FI