SNStest: Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Stimulation Before Definitive Implantation

Sponsor
University of Lausanne Hospitals (Other)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT00522691
Collaborator
(none)
0
1
2
27
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an emerging treatment for patients with severe fecal incontinence. The test stimulation is minimally invasive, associated to low morbidity and relatively cheap. On the contrary, implantation of the definite stimulator is related to higher morbidity and considerable costs. A careful patent selection for definite implantation is therefore crucial. However, indication for implantation is actually based only on the subjective criteria reported in the patients´ diary only. Patients and care providers are likely to overestimate the real effect of SNS leading to an unjustified overuse of this expensive device. It is therefore necessary to evaluate real efficacy of SNS during the testing phase in a unbiased setting in order to avoid unnecessary morbidity and costs.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: sacral nerve stimulation
N/A

Detailed Description

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an emerging treatment for patients with severe faecal incontinence when conservative measures fail and surgical repair is not indicated. In a minimally-invasive approach and under local anaesthesia, an electrode is placed around sacral nerve root S2-4 and electrical stimulation is applied to the sacral spinal nerves. Effectiveness of SNS is definitively not only explained by placebo effect but the pathophysiologic mechanisms remain unclear. Suggested pathways include modulation of afferent nerve fibres and direct stimulation of the pelvic floor and anal sphincter muscle. After placement of the electrode, the patient is stimulated by an external stimulator for 1-3 weeks. During this period, the patient documents the number of faecal incontinence episodes or urgencies in a symptom diary. By convention, indication for permanent stimulation is based on a 50% reduction in the number of episodes. After a successful testing period, the permanent stimulator is implanted, generally in the upper gluteal region.

Previous studies report success rates up to 80%. The only randomized trial with a proper sample size evaluated the efficacy of SNS after definite implantation. In this study, 63% of the patients felt improved during the placebo period and might not really benefit from the device. The real success rate of SNS is therefore likely to be considerably lower. Efficacy of SNS during the testing phase has never been assessed in a blinded randomized study.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Stimulation Before Definitive Implantation: a Multicenter Randomized, Double Blind, Crossover Trial
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2009
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2009

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: A: sacral first

Phase 1: sacral nerve stimulation crossover Phase 2 : sham stimulation

Procedure: sacral nerve stimulation
sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence

Experimental: B: sham first

Phase 1: sham stimulation crossover Phase 2: sacral nerve stimulation

Procedure: sacral nerve stimulation
sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Primary success rate of SNS after 7 days. By convention this is assessed by >50% reduction in the number of episodes in the symptom diary. [24 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • All patients admitted to SNS test for treatment of faecal incontinence after unsuccessful conservative (or surgical) treatment.
Exclusion criteria:
  • Absence of informed consent.

  • Patients not speaking french or german.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Visceral surgery, university hospital Lausanne Vaud Switzerland 1005

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Lausanne Hospitals

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin Hubner, MD, Visceral Surgery, University Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Study Director: Jean-Claude Givel, Professor, Visceral Surgery, University Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Study Chair: Nicolas Demartines, Professor, Visceral Surgery, University Lausanne, Switzerland

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Nicolas DEMARTINES, PI, University of Lausanne Hospitals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00522691
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CHV120/07
First Posted:
Aug 30, 2007
Last Update Posted:
Jun 24, 2015
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2015
Keywords provided by Nicolas DEMARTINES, PI, University of Lausanne Hospitals
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 24, 2015