SITOT: Feasibility of Comparing Two Surgical Treatment of Female Urodynamic Stress

Sponsor
University of Aberdeen (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01230450
Collaborator
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (Other)
137
1
2
23
6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Aim: The study aim to assess the feasibly a large prospective multi-centre randomised study for comparing the relatively new "Single incision sub-urethral tapes" with the standard surgical treatment of female urodynamic stress incontinence (USI).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: sub-urethral tape (TVT-O)
  • Other: stand standard mid-urethral sling (TVT-O)
Phase 1

Detailed Description

Single incision tension-free sub-urethral vaginal tapes procedures8 have been recently described in an attempt to avoid the blind passage of the trochars through the groin & the adductor muscles and consequently reducing the incidence & severity of postoperative leg pain. The obvious advantages would be shorter hospital stay, early recovery, early resumption of day to day activities & earlier return to work. A number of small prospective audits and case-series have been presented in international conferences reporting on the safety & outcomes for these procedures. However all these studies were for preliminary reports for proof of concept and therefore the studies populations were 15-70 women with short term follow-up of 2-3 month9-11.These studies have shown low perioperative complication rates: bladder injury 0-1%, vaginal erosion 1-3% & one study showing 1.3% pain at 6 weeks follow-up. The patient reported success rates were 77-93% at 2-3 month follow-up9-12.

Objectives:
  1. Establish the feasibility of the "Single incision sub-urethral tapes" to be done under local anaesthesia.

  2. The feasibility of randomisation to the standard surgical treatment TVT-O / TVT.

  3. To compare the surgical approach in this relatively new procedure against the standard procedures as regard: Peri-operative complication rates, Postoperative pain, Time to discharge from the hospital,

  4. To compare the outcomes as regard: Patient-reported cure rates, Patient satisfaction, Impact on Quality of life (QoL) and sexual function at 3 month & 1 -year follow-up. The objective cure rates will be assessed at 3 month follow-up.

Design:

A pilot prospective randomised study within participating urogynaecology units of the "Scottish Pelvic Floor Network".

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
137 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Feasibility of Comparing Two Surgical Treatment of Female Urodynamic Stress Incontinence (SITOT)
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Single-incision Mini-slings (SIMS- Ajust)

AjustTM has polypropylene fixing anchors (one is fixed and the other adjustable) which are anchored onto the obturator membrane. The pulley like system enables adjustment of the tension once the arms have been anchored. Once in place, the anchors rest at right angles to insertion which is claimed to reduce the chances of anchor dislodgment

Procedure: sub-urethral tape (TVT-O)
Tension free vaginal tape vs. single incision sub-urethral tension free vaginal tape

Other: standared med urethral sling (SMUS)

standard med urethral sling (SMUS)TVT-O, was done as originally described by Deleval et al.

Other: stand standard mid-urethral sling (TVT-O)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. • Feasibility of the single incision sub-urethral tape to be done under local anaesthesia [1 year]

    Feasibility of the single incision sub-urethral tape to be done under local anaesthesia? Number of women approached and declining LA o Number of women in LA group converted to GA

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. • Patient-reported Success rates [1 year]

    Patient-reported Success rates o Assessed by PGI-I "Very Much Improved/ Much Improved."

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • USI

  • Mixed incontinence symptoms with predominantly bothering stress component (No DO on UDS).

  • Primary Incontinence Surgery.

  • BMI < 35

  • Ability to understand the information leaflet and sign an informed consent form in English.

  • All would have had failed or declined PFMT.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Mixed incontinence with pre-dominant OAB and/or Neurological conditions e.g. MS.

  • Detrusor Overactivity on Urodynamics.

  • Inability to understand English.

  • Un-willing for randomisation.

  • Concomitant surgery.

  • Patient requiring postoperative hospital-stay for medical or social reasons

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 (Grampian) Aberdeen Royal Infermary Aberdeen Aberdeenshire United Kingdom AB25 2ZD

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Aberdeen
  • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed Abdel-Fattah, MRCOG, University of Aberdeen

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University of Aberdeen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01230450
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • SI-TOT
First Posted:
Oct 29, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Jan 24, 2013
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2013
Keywords provided by University of Aberdeen
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 24, 2013