Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Garetosmab in Japanese Adult Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP)

Sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
Overall Status
Withdrawn
CT.gov ID
NCT04577820
Collaborator
(none)
0
1
11.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The primary safety objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of garetosmab in Japanese male and female adult patients with FOP.

The primary efficacy objective of the study is to assess the effect of garetosmab on Heterotopic ossification (HO) in Japanese adult patients with FOP, as determined by the number of new heterotopic bone lesions identified by computed tomography (CT).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
0 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Garetosmab in Japanese Adult Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Oct 13, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 8, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: garetosmab

Drug: garetosmab
Repeated doses administered intravenously (IV) every four weeks (Q4W)
Other Names:
  • REGN2477
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs) [Through week 28]

    2. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT [At week 28]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT [At week 28]

    2. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) [At week 28]

    3. Total lesion activity in new HO lesions as assessed by PET [At week 28]

    4. Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by CT [At week 28]

    5. Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by PET [At week 28]

    6. Percent of patients with investigator-assessed flare-ups [Baseline to week 28]

    7. Percent of patients with investigator-assessed flare-ups [Baseline to week 56]

    8. Percent of patients with flare-ups assessed by patient e-diary [Baseline to week 28]

    9. Percent of patients with flare-ups assessed by patient e-diary [Baseline to week 56]

    10. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT [At week 56]

    11. Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT [At week 56]

    12. Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by CT [At week 56]

    13. Number of new HO lesions as assessed by PET [At week 56]

    14. Total lesion activity in new HO lesions as assessed by PET [At week 56]

    15. Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by PET [At week 56]

    16. Change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET [Baseline and week 28]

    17. Change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET [Baseline and week 56]

    18. Percent change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET [Baseline and week 28]

    19. Percent change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET [Baseline and week 56]

    20. Change in total lesion activity by PET [Baseline and week 28]

    21. Change in total lesion activity by PET [Baseline and week 56]

    22. Percent change in total lesion activity by PET [Baseline and week 28]

    23. Percent change in total lesion activity by PET [Baseline and week 56]

    24. Change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT [Baseline and week 28]

    25. Change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT [Baseline and week 56]

    26. Percent change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT [Baseline and week 28]

    27. Percent change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT [Baseline and week 56]

    28. Change in number of HO lesions as assessed by PET [Baseline and week 28]

      HO lesions defined as target and new lesions relative to baseline.

    29. Change in number of HO lesions as assessed by PET [Baseline and week 56]

      Defined above

    30. Change in the number of HO lesions detectable by CT [Baseline and week 28]

      Defined above

    31. Change in the number of HO lesions detectable by CT [Baseline and week 56]

      Defined above

    32. Time-weighted average (standardized area under curve [AUC]) change in daily pain due to FOP, as measured using the daily numeric rating scale (NRS) [Baseline through week 28]

      The NRS is a categorical rating scale used by patients to rate their pain associated with FOP. Patients will be asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst possible pain).

    33. Time-weighted average (standardized AUC) change in daily pain due to FOP, as measured using the daily NRS [Baseline through week 56]

    34. Total dosage of glucocorticoids use [Through week 56]

    35. Incidence and severity of TEAEs [Through week 56]

    36. Concentration of total activin A in serum over time [Through week 56]

    37. Pharmacokinetic (Pk) Profile - concentrations of garetosmab in serum over time [Through week 56]

    38. Immunogenicity as measured by Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to garetosmab over time [Through week 28]

    39. Percent change from baseline in biomarkers of bone formation levels in serum [Through week 28]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 60 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Key Inclusion Criteria:
    • Clinical diagnosis of FOP (based on findings of congenital malformation of the great toes, episodic soft tissue swelling, and/or progressive HO)

    • Confirmation of FOP diagnosis with documentation of any Type I activin A receptor (ACVR1) mutation

    • FOP disease activity, as defined in the protocol, within 1 year of screening visit

    • Willing and able to undergo PET and CT imaging procedures and other procedures as defined in this study

    • Able to understand and complete study-related questionnaires and diaries (assistance from caregivers is allowed)

    Key Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patient has significant concomitant illness or history of significant illness such as but not limited to cardiac, renal, rheumatologic, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrine, metabolic, or lymphatic disease, that in the opinion of the study investigator might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the patient by their participation in the study

    • Previous history or diagnosis of cancer

    • Severely impaired renal function defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (1 retest is allowed)

    • Uncontrolled diabetes defined as hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) >9% at screening (1 retest allowed)

    • History of severe respiratory compromise, as defined in protocol

    • Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical study or a non-interventional study with radiographic measures or invasive procedures

    • Pregnant or breastfeeding women

    NOTE: Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Clinical Trial Management, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04577820
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • R2477-FOP-1940
    First Posted:
    Oct 8, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 1, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Nov 1, 2021