Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Fibromyalgia
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of 10 Hz neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on pain, stiffness, fatigue, depression/anxiety, quality of life and cognitive functions in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study in two-arm parallel-group design. Twenty participants will be randomized into 2 groups. Randomization will be performed using computer-generated block randomization with 1:1 allocation between the active rTMS group (Group 1) and the sham-control group (Group 2). Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS)-A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). Group 2 will receive sham stimulation-A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).All patients will be evaluated with pain severity (VAS-10mm),stiffness severity (VAS-10mm), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Hospital Depression Anxiety Scale (HADS), Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-revised version (ACE-R).Patients will be questioned for the safety of treatment. Available drug therapies will be continued in both groups. Patients and clinical raters will be blinded to treatment. All patients will be reviewed by the investigator in terms of rTMS treatment safety and motor threshold determination before each treatment session and observed for possible side effects after treatment. All side effects will be recorded. Magnetic stimulation will be applied using Neurosoft-Neuro MS/D with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil. rTMS therapy will be applied under the guide of neuronavigation with the following parameters: target-left DLPFC, with the %90 of the RMT, 10 Hz stimulation for 5 seconds intervals (on) with 25 seconds inter-train intervals (off), 15 minutes, 1500 pulses.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Active rTMS Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Device: rTMS + Neuronavigation
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Neuro-MS/D) + Neural Navigator
|
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Device: rTMS + Neuronavigation
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Neuro-MS/D) + Neural Navigator
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Visual Analog Scale-Pain [in the second week]
The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Visual Analog Scale-Pain [in the sixth week]
The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
- Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire [in the sixth week]
Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.
Other Outcome Measures
- Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness [in the second week]
The severity of the stiffness at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no stiffness, 10=severe stiffness) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
- Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire [in the second week]
Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.
- Fatigue Severity Scale [in the sixth week]
Severity of fatigue was evaluated with Fatigue severity scale, a 9-item self-report questionnaire scale. Each item of this scale consists of statements that are scored on a seven-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 to 7. Total Fatigue severity scale score is calculated as the mean value of nine items. Higher scores indicate higher fatigue severity. (Total score range: 1-7)
- Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [in the sixth week]
Hospital anxiety and depression scale is an assessment tool developed to identify the risk of anxiety and depression and measure its level and change of severity. Its subscales are anxiety and depression. It contains 14 questions in total, including 7 (odd numbers) measuring anxiety and 7 (even numbers) measuring depression. The lowest and highest total score that a person can obtain from this scale are 0 and 42, respectively. High scores are associated with a worse psychiatric condition.
- Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised [in the sixth week]
Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-Revised is a brief cognitive test that consists of 5 basic sections: attention and orientation, memory, verbal fluency, language and visual-spatial abilities. Total score that can be obtained is 0-100. Higher scores are associated with a better cognitive state.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Adults (age between 18-65 years)
-
Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome according to 2016 Fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria
-
The mean pain intensity is VAS ≥ 4/10
-
Stable treatment for at least last 3 months
-
Patients accepting participation by signing an informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
-
To have a clinical condition to be contraindicated for TMS (metallic implant, cardiac pace, pregnancy, lactation, epilepsy, head trauma, history of cranial operation...)
-
The presence of malignancy
-
Systemic rheumatic diseases
-
Major orthopedic / neurological problems that limit daily life activities
-
Alcohol or drug addiction
-
Major depression / personality disorder history
-
Have received TMS treatment before
-
Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Izmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | İzmir | Turkey | 35290 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Izmir Katip Celebi University
Investigators
- Study Director: Ayhan Aşkın, Assoc. Prof., Izmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
- Baudic S, Attal N, Mhalla A, Ciampi de Andrade D, Perrot S, Bouhassira D. Unilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex does not affect cognition in patients with fibromyalgia. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jan;47(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
- Hou WH, Wang TY, Kang JH. The effects of add-on non-invasive brain stimulation in fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Aug;55(8):1507-17. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew205. Epub 2016 May 5. Review.
- Klein MM, Treister R, Raij T, Pascual-Leone A, Park L, Nurmikko T, Lenz F, Lefaucheur JP, Lang M, Hallett M, Fox M, Cudkowicz M, Costello A, Carr DB, Ayache SS, Oaklander AL. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: guidelines for pain treatment research. Pain. 2015 Sep;156(9):1601-1614. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000210. Review.
- Knijnik LM, Dussán-Sarria JA, Rozisky JR, Torres IL, Brunoni AR, Fregni F, Caumo W. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Pract. 2016 Mar;16(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/papr.12276. Epub 2015 Jan 12. Review.
- Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipović SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jääskeläinen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorová I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1. Review. Erratum in: Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 May;131(5):1168-1169.
- Lefaucheur JP, André-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipović SR, Hummel FC, Jääskeläinen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5. Review.
- Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Review.
- Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10. Review.
- Saltychev M, Laimi K. Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Mar;40(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000207. Review.
- Tekin A, Özdil E, Güleken MD, İlişer R, Bakım B, Öncü J, et al. Efficacy of HighFrequency [10 Hz] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the PrimaryMotor Cortex in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Randomized, DoubleBlind, Sham-Controlled Trial. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain. 2014;22(1):20-26.
- 14032019
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Participants were recruited from Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR) outpatient clinics of a university hospital. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Twenty-eight patients were evaluated for participation in the study. Eight patients were excluded. |
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 10 | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 10 | 10 | 20 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
10
100%
|
10
100%
|
20
100%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
46.70
(9.06)
|
43.80
(9.37)
|
45.25
(9.08)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
10
100%
|
10
100%
|
20
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
10
100%
|
10
100%
|
20
100%
|
Region of Enrollment (Count of Participants) | |||
Turkey |
10
100%
|
10
100%
|
20
100%
|
Visual Analog Scale-Pain (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
7.20
(1.75)
|
7.40
(1.35)
|
7.30
(1.52)
|
Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
7.40
(1.58)
|
7.60
(1.17)
|
7.50
(1.35)
|
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (scores on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [scores on a scale] |
65.86
(8.27)
|
66.44
(11.40)
|
66.15
(9.69)
|
Fatigue Severity Scale (scores on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [scores on a scale] |
5.28
(1.23)
|
6.08
(1.11)
|
5.68
(1.20)
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (scores on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [scores on a scale] |
19.30
(8.14)
|
22.90
(5.61)
|
21.10
(7.04)
|
Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised (scores on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [scores on a scale] |
62.50
(18.80)
|
76.90
(11.17)
|
69.70
(16.76)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Visual Analog Scale-Pain |
---|---|
Description | The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome. |
Time Frame | in the second week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
5.30
(2.11)
|
6.80
(1.69)
|
Title | Visual Analog Scale-Pain |
---|---|
Description | The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome. |
Time Frame | in the sixth week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
5.70
(2.63)
|
6.70
(1.83)
|
Title | Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire |
---|---|
Description | Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level. |
Time Frame | in the sixth week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
51.71
(22.17)
|
56.02
(22.57)
|
Title | Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness |
---|---|
Description | The severity of the stiffness at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no stiffness, 10=severe stiffness) Higher scores mean a worse outcome. |
Time Frame | in the second week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
5.10
(2.13)
|
6.60
(1.96)
|
Title | Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire |
---|---|
Description | Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level. |
Time Frame | in the second week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
48.35
(16.64)
|
54.39
(15.47)
|
Title | Fatigue Severity Scale |
---|---|
Description | Severity of fatigue was evaluated with Fatigue severity scale, a 9-item self-report questionnaire scale. Each item of this scale consists of statements that are scored on a seven-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 to 7. Total Fatigue severity scale score is calculated as the mean value of nine items. Higher scores indicate higher fatigue severity. (Total score range: 1-7) |
Time Frame | in the sixth week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
4.89
(1.59)
|
5.39
(1.62)
|
Title | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale |
---|---|
Description | Hospital anxiety and depression scale is an assessment tool developed to identify the risk of anxiety and depression and measure its level and change of severity. Its subscales are anxiety and depression. It contains 14 questions in total, including 7 (odd numbers) measuring anxiety and 7 (even numbers) measuring depression. The lowest and highest total score that a person can obtain from this scale are 0 and 42, respectively. High scores are associated with a worse psychiatric condition. |
Time Frame | in the sixth week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
18.80
(7.82)
|
17.60
(10.68)
|
Title | Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised |
---|---|
Description | Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-Revised is a brief cognitive test that consists of 5 basic sections: attention and orientation, memory, verbal fluency, language and visual-spatial abilities. Total score that can be obtained is 0-100. Higher scores are associated with a better cognitive state. |
Time Frame | in the sixth week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). | Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale] |
66.50
(19.67)
|
81.40
(7.79)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 6 weeks (Between the start of the study and the day when the last outcome measure is evaluated) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Active rTMS | Sham rTMS | ||
Arm/Group Description | Group 1 will receive HF rTMS treatment daily from Monday to Friday in first 2 weeks. After first 2 weeks there will be sessions once a week for 1 month. There will be 14 sessions in total. rTMS + Neuronavigation: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Neuro-MS/D) + Neural Navigator | Group 2 will receive sham daily from Monday to Friday in first 2 weeks. After first 2 weeks there will be sessions once a week for 1 month. There will be 14 sham sessions in total. rTMS + Neuronavigation: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Neuro-MS/D) + Neural Navigator | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Active rTMS | Sham rTMS | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Active rTMS | Sham rTMS | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Active rTMS | Sham rTMS | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Doç.Dr. Ayhan AŞKIN |
---|---|
Organization | Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Faculty of Medicine |
Phone | 00902322444444 ext 1529 |
ayhanaskin@hotmail.com |
- 14032019