Food Form & Energy Intake

Sponsor

Penn State University (Other)

Overall Status

Enrolling by invitation

CT.gov ID

NCT05258097

Collaborator

Social Sciences Research Institute at Penn State University (Other), Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute at Penn State University (Other), Clinical Research Center at Penn State University (Other)

Enrollment

Locations

Anticipated Duration (Months)

Patients Per Site

1.1

Patients Per Site Per Month

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study primarily aims to examine how food presented in various forms (i.e., solid, semi-solid, and liquid) affects children's ability to self-regulate energy intake at a subsequent meal. Additionally, this study aims to examine how several child-level individual differences are associated with differences in various aspects of children's appetite self-regulation. The investigators will recruit 78 children between the ages of 4.5-6 years in order to test the primary hypothesis that energy presented in a liquid form will elicit poorer self-regulation than solid and semi-solid food forms.

Condition or Disease	Intervention/Treatment	Phase
Appetite Self-regulation, Pediatric Obesity

Detailed Description

A detailed registered report of the following methods can be found at:

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnut.2022.791718/full?&utm_source=Email_to_aut hors_&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=T1_11.5e1_author&utm_campaign=Email_publication&field=&jou rnalName=Frontiers_in_Nutrition&id=791718

Overview This study aims to examine how various factors, including food form and child-level individual differences, affect appetite self-regulation. The primary aim of this study is to examine how apples presented in solid, semi-solid, and liquid forms (apple slices, apple sauce, apple juice, respectively) differentially affect children's ability to compensate for this energy at a subsequent ad libitum test meal.

In order to test this hypothesis, a within-subjects, crossover design with repeated measures will be used to test 78, 4.5-6.0 year-old children' energy compensation using a standard preloading paradigm (Johnson & Birch 1994; Birch & Deysher 1986). Children and their parents will visit the Metabolic Kitchen and Children's Eating Behavior Lab at Penn State once a week over an approximate 5-week period, for a total of five, one and a half hour sessions. On each test session, children will be served one of five preload conditions: apple slices, apple sauce, regular apple juice, apple juice sweetened with non-nutritive sweetener (NNS), or no preload. The same standardized test meal of foods commonly accepted in this age group (described below) will then be served ∼20 min after the start of preload consumption. Families will attend either lunch or dinner meals based on availability, but meal times will be kept consistent within families. Children will be fasted for 3 h upon arrival to each visit.

Energy compensation Energy compensation will be examined by comparing meal intake following each preload condition. Apple slices, apple sauce, and regular apple juice will be matched for energy content, weight, and energy density. The NNS preload will be matched for weight with the other preloads. Apple slices (133 g) will be served to children without the skin. Apple sauce will be prepared using 133 g peeled, sliced apples heated for 20 min at 350 degrees Fahrenheit. Once cooked, the apples will be puréed and any water lost during heating will be added back to ensure consistent weight between preload conditions. Apple juice (133

will be 120.4 g of Mott's 100% Apple Juice (Mott's, Mott's Inc., Plano, TX) and 12.6 g water to match the weight and energy density of the apple slices and apple sauce. Lastly, NNS apple juice (133 g) will be prepared with 66.5 g Mott's Light Apple Juice (Mott's, Mott's Inc., Plano, TX) and 66.5 g Old Orchard Healthy Balance Diet Apple Juice Cocktail (Old Orchard Brands LLC, Lassonde Industries Inc., Sparta, MI).

Preload ingestion time will be controlled and preload volume will be masked in each of the conditions. Preloads will be disguised under an apple-themed box to reduce perceptions of volume. Audio recordings of a story were developed to control ingestion rate. These stories will be played for the children during preload consumption and mention a key word ("apple") 16 times, once every 45 seconds. When the key word is mentioned, children are to reach into the box and pull out a soufflé cup containing one pre-portioned amount of the preload.

Approximately 20 minutes after the start of the preload, children will be served an ad libitum test meal of : macaroni and cheese (Kraft, Kraft Heinz Co., Chicago, IL), frozen broccoli florets (Birds Eye, Conagra Brands, Chicago, IL), red grapes (Wegmans, Wegmans Food Markets, Rochester, NY), baby carrots (Wegmans, Wegmans Food Markets, Rochester, NY), graham crackers (Nabisco Original, Nabisco, East Hanover, NJ), and water.

Aims and Hypotheses:

Aim 1 of this study is to examine the effect of food form on children's subsequent energy intake. The investigators hypothesize that energy intake at the ad libitum test meal will be greatest following the liquid (apple juice) preload, indicating the lowest satiety and poorest appetite self-regulation during this preload condition compared to apple sauce and apple slices matched for energy content. Conversely, we expect meal energy intake to be lowest following the solid (apple slice) preload, indicating greatest satiety and appetite self-regulation on this condition compared to apple juice and apple sauce conditions. We hypothesize that meal intake following apple sauce will be greater than that following the apple slices but lower than that following apple juice, based on previous findings in adults (Flood-Obbagy & Rolls 2009).

Aim 2 of this study is to examine energy compensation by comparing meal intakes following the apple juice preload and the NNS apple juice preload. Energy compensation will be quantified by calculating COMPx (Johnson & Birch 1994). We hypothesize that children, on average, will demonstrate good COMPx but that there will be wide variability in this measure.

Aim 3 of this study is to examine sex differences in children's COMPx. We hypothesize that boys will demonstrate better COMPx than girls.

Secondary aims of this study are to examine other measures of appetite self-regulation (eating in the absence of hunger and food-specific delay of gratification) and how they may be associated with energy compensation for food form and COMPx. Additionally, exploratory analyses will examine how these measures of appetite self-regulation relate to child-level individual differences of sex, body composition assessed via dual X-ray absorptiometry, anthropometrics, previous exposure to NNS, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, social desirability, and portion size discrimination.

Study Design

Study Type:

Observational

Anticipated Enrollment :

78 participants

Observational Model:

Other

Time Perspective:

Cross-Sectional

Official Title:

Examining the Effects of Food Form and Individual Differences on Children's Self-regulation of Energy Intake

Actual Study Start Date :

Nov 2, 2021

Anticipated Primary Completion Date :

Nov 2, 2024

Anticipated Study Completion Date :

Nov 2, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm	Intervention/Treatment
Boys Child sex based on parent report on a screening questionnaire
Girls Child sex based on parent report on a screening questionnaire

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

Energy compensation by food form [Baseline]
Meal intake in kilocalories following each of the three caloric preloads (apple slices, apple sauce, apple juice)
Energy compensation (COMPx) for two juice preloads [Baseline]
COMPx for the two juice preloads using the following equation: ((Meal kcal following NNS juice - Meal kcal following regular juice) / (Regular juice kcal - NNS juice kcal)) x100
Sex differences [Baseline]
Differences in COMPx by child sex

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:

54 Months to 83 Months

Sexes Eligible for Study:

All

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:

Yes

Inclusion Criteria:

Children between the ages of 4.5-6 years-old
Physically healthy (no major disabilities or disease states)
Free of any known food allergies
Free of any medical conditions that affect appetite or ability to follow study protocol
Not taking medications that affect appetite or ability to follow study protocol
Like and willing to consume apple slices, apple sauce, and apple juice as well as at least 4 of the 5 ad libitum meal test foods according to parental report on a screening questionnaire
Parent or legal guardian primarily in charge of feeding child able to attend all 5 visits

Exclusion Criteria:

Children with medical condition affecting appetite or ability to follow study protocol, including but not limited to autism, ADHD, or developmental delays
Children taking medications (prescription or over-the-counter) that may affect appetite or ability to follow study protocols
Children younger than 4.5 years or older than 6 years
Children with major disability or disease state
Children with food allergies of any kind or severity
Children who do not like/are not willing to consume all three of the following: apple slices, apple sauce, and apple juice
Children who do not like/are not willing to consume at least four of the five test meal foods
Parent or legal guardian primarily in charge of feeding the child not able to attend all 5 study visits

Contacts and Locations

Locations

	Site	City	State	Country	Postal Code
1	Metabolic Kitchen and Children's Eating Behavior Lab	University Park	Pennsylvania	United States	16802
2	The Pennsylvania State University	University Park	Pennsylvania	United States	16802