EDECHCNFOODSEC: Evaluation of Demonstrations to End Childhood Hunger - CN Food Sec

Sponsor
USDA Food and Nutrition Service (U.S. Fed)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04316819
Collaborator
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (Other)
4,750
2
24

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The 2010 Child Nutrition Reauthorization provided funding to test innovative strategies to end childhood hunger and food insecurity. Demonstration projects were funded in Chickasaw Nation, Kentucky, Navajo Nation, Nevada, and Virginia. This study focuses on Chickasaw Nation.

School districts were matched, and then one was randomly assigned to either a treatment (n=20) or control group (n=20). Treatment households received one food box per eligible child, per month, delivered to the household, which contained (1) shelf-stable foods, including 6 protein-rich items, 2 dairy items, 4 grain foods, 4 cans of fruit, and 12 cans of vegetables; (2) a nutrition education handout (e.g., a recipe); and (3) a $15 Fresh Check for frozen or fresh fruits and vegetables that participants could redeem at any of 38 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)-authorized stores or farmers' markets in the study counties. Control households did not receive the treatment benefits but still could participate in other available nutrition assistance programs.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Packed Promise Demonstration Benefits
N/A

Detailed Description

Objective: To reduce childhood food insecurity and hunger, increase families' consumption of nutritious foods, increase the diversity of foods in the home, and ultimately improve diet quality and well-being among children.

Target Population: 40 school districts (115 schools) in 12 counties within the Chickasaw Nation territory in Oklahoma. Within these districts, households with school-age children (both Native American and non-Native American) who were eligible for free school meals or attended a school that participated in the community eligibility provision were eligible to participate in the project.

Intervention School districts were matched, and then one was randomly assigned to either a treatment (n=20) or control group (n=20). Treatment households received one food box per eligible child, per month, delivered to the household, which contained (1) shelf-stable foods, including 6 protein-rich items, 2 dairy items, 4 grain foods, 4 cans of fruit, and 12 cans of vegetables; (2) a nutrition education handout (e.g., a recipe); and (3) a $15 Fresh Check for frozen or fresh fruits and vegetables that participants could redeem at any of 38 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)-authorized stores or farmers' markets in the study counties. Control households did not receive the treatment benefits but still could participate in other available nutrition assistance programs.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
4750 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Evaluation of Demonstrations to End Childhood Hunger - CN Food Security
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Packed Promise Demonstration Benefits

Treatment households (n=2,143) received one food box per eligible child, per month, delivered to the household, which contained (1) shelf-stable foods, including 6 protein-rich items, 2 dairy items, 4 grain foods, 4 cans of fruit, and 12 cans of vegetables; (2) a nutrition education handout (e.g., a recipe); and (3) a $15 Fresh Check for frozen or fresh fruits and vegetables that participants could redeem at any of 38 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)-authorized stores or farmers' markets in the study counties.

Other: Packed Promise Demonstration Benefits
Monthly: Home-delivered food box, nutrition education handout, and $15 monthly voucher for fruits and vegetables

No Intervention: Control Group

Control households (n=2,607) did not receive the treatment benefits but still could participate in other available nutrition assistance programs.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Food Insecurity among Children [30 days]

    Measured by the United States Department of Agriculture's Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM). Affirming 2 or more out of the 8 child-level items in the HFSSM. Higher scores generally indicates worsening food insecurity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Very Low Food Insecurity among Children [30 days]

    Measured by the United States Department of Agriculture's Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM). Affirming 5 or more out of the 8 child-level items in the HFSSM. Higher scores generally indicates worsening food insecurity.

  2. Food Insecurity among Adults [30 days]

    Measured by the United States Department of Agriculture's Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM). Affirming 3 or more out of the 10 adult-level items in the HFSSM. Higher scores generally indicates worsening food insecurity.

  3. Household Food Insecurity [30 days]

    Measured by the United States Department of Agriculture's Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM). Affirming 3 or more out of the 18 items in the HFSSM. Higher scores generally indicates worsening food insecurity.

  4. Food expenditures [30 days]

    Total amount of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and out-of-pocket food purchases in dollars.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
5 Years to 18 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • 40 school districts (115 schools) in 12 counties within the Chickasaw Nation territory in Oklahoma.

  • Within these districts, households with school-age children (both Native American and non-Native American) who were eligible for free National School Lunch Program meals or attended a school that participated in the community eligibility provision were eligible to participate in the project.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • USDA Food and Nutrition Service
  • Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Michael P Burke, PhD, USDA Food and Nutrition Service

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
USDA Food and Nutrition Service
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04316819
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AG-3198-C-14-0019 (CN FoodSec)
First Posted:
Mar 20, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Mar 20, 2020
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by USDA Food and Nutrition Service

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 20, 2020