Full Thickness Macular Hole; Should it be Handled Subacutely?

Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05828251
Collaborator
(none)
56
1
3
59.1
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Full thickness macular hole, FTMH, is a retinal disease involving the fovea that cause central vision loss, metamorphopsia and central scotoma. The most effective treatment for FTMH is a pars plana vitrectomy and a tamponade with expansile gas. It is well known that vitrectomy accelerates cataract development. Vitrectomy can therefore be combined with cataract surgery in the same setting, a procedure that is shown to be safe, although increased inflammation and rates of central macular edema have been reported in some studies. Cataract surgery can also be performed prior or deferred until compromising the visual acuity after vitrectomy. Cataract-surgeries are more challenging in vitrectomized eyes due to lack of vitreous support and risk of loose zonules. The normal practice for FTMH at our department is therefore cataract surgery followed by vitrectomy 4 weeks later. A combined phaco-vitrectomy procedure is offered to patients who are at the labor market or when general anesthesia is required for the surgery. In non-presbyopic patients (<50 years) only vitrectomy is performed.

The visual improvement after surgery seems to be dependent on preoperative characteristics, such as the preoperative visual acuity, size of the hole and the duration of symptoms. The duration of symptoms is a known prognostic factor, and recently shown that the longer duration, the worse visual outcome. The precise timeframe for the optimal final outcome is not known.

The combined surgery is known to be safe in the treatment for epiretinal membrane, where a intravitreal gasfill is not necessary. However, the use of gas in FTHM surgery causes risk of increased movement of the newly inserted intraocular lens. This can lead to increased anterior segment inflammation with ensuing vision threatening cystic macular edema, as mentioned above.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether small FTMH with a short duration of symptoms have better visual outcome with a prompt combined phako-vitrectomy (within two weeks), compared to the current standard of care of receiving cataract surgery as soon as possible and vitrectomy 4 weeks later. How the delay of surgery affects the visual outcome will also be investigated, by including patients with longer duration of symptoms. The main hypothesis is that the chance of better visual outcome is higher for macular holes with early surgery compared to the current standard of care and that the duration of symptoms has significant impact on the visual outcome.

Method

The study consists of 2 parts.

  1. Patients with idiopathic FTMH <400µm in diameter (as defined by The international vitreomacular traction study group classification), with a duration of symptoms of less than 30 days will be randomized into 2 groups:

Group1: Combined phaco-vitrectomy within 2 weeks (after referral). Group 2: Current standard of care with cataract surgery as soon as possible and vitrectomy 4 weeks later.

  1. Group 3: Patients with small holes <400µm, with a duration of symptoms of more than 3 months and less than one year will be included in this part of the study. These patients will be treated and followed as in Group 2.

They will be reviewed a total of 7 times in Group 1 and 9 times in Group 2 and 3: a preoperative examination followed by 6/8 postoperative examinations. Additional examinations will be scheduled if needed.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Vitrectomy (Sequential phakoemulsification and vitrectomy)
  • Procedure: Combined phako-vitrectomy
  • Procedure: Phako (Sequential phakoemulsification and vitrectomy)
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
56 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomized controlled trial in the first part om of the study, 28 patients in each arm. Prospective study in second part of the study with 28 patients.Randomized controlled trial in the first part om of the study, 28 patients in each arm. Prospective study in second part of the study with 28 patients.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Full Thickness Macular Hole; Should it be Handled Subacutely?
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Apr 30, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2028

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Combined Phako-Vitrectomy for FTMH

Study 1: Patient randomized to this arm will receive a combined phako-vitrectomy within two weeks from referall day.

Procedure: Combined phako-vitrectomy
Phakoemulsication and pars plana vitrectomy are performed in the same setting. This procedure is normally only offeres to selected cases at our department.

Active Comparator: Sequential phako and vitrectomy for FTMH

Study 1: Patients randomized to this arm will receive a standard phacoemulsification as soon as possible. About four weeks after phacoemulsification a vitrectomy is performed.

Procedure: Vitrectomy (Sequential phakoemulsification and vitrectomy)
Standard treatment for FTMH at our department with phakoemulsification followed by pars plana vitrectomy and gas 4 weeks later.

Procedure: Phako (Sequential phakoemulsification and vitrectomy)
Standard treatment for FTMH at our department with phakoemulsification followed by pars plana vitrectomy and gas 4 weeks later.

Other: Longstanding FTMH

Study 2: Patients with symptomduration of 3-12 months will be included in this part of the study in a prospective design.

Procedure: Vitrectomy (Sequential phakoemulsification and vitrectomy)
Standard treatment for FTMH at our department with phakoemulsification followed by pars plana vitrectomy and gas 4 weeks later.

Procedure: Phako (Sequential phakoemulsification and vitrectomy)
Standard treatment for FTMH at our department with phakoemulsification followed by pars plana vitrectomy and gas 4 weeks later.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Visual acuity [12 months after vitrectomy]

    Best corrected visual acuity measured with ETDRS, the ETDRS scoe will be converted to LogMAR

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Metamorphopsia [12 months after vitrectomy]

    Measured by M-charts, for vertical and horisontal metamorfopisa. The M-charts consist of 19 dotted (dot size is 0.1°) lines with dot intervals ranging from 0.2° to 2.0° of visual angle.

  2. Hole closure rates [Measured 4 weeks after surgery]

    Either the hole closes og it doesn't.

  3. Microperimetry [12 months after surgery]

    Microperimetry is a procedure to assess retinal sensitivity while fundus is directly examined; it enables exact correlation between macular pathology and corresponding functional abnormality. Measured in mean retinal sensitivity (dB)

  4. Anterior chamber inflammation [1 day and 1 week after the first surgery]

    (FM). The FM is based on the measurement principle of laser light scattering detection. The instrument uses a diode laser beam to scan a measuring window that is projected inside the anterior chamber of the eye. As an aqueous protein (component of inflammation) passes through the focal point of the laser,light scattering occurs. The intensity of the scattered light (directly proportional to the amount of protein particles-flare) is detected by a photo-multiplier tube (PMT), which generates an electrical signal. This signal is immediately digitized to eliminate outside noise interference and are processed by a computer which displays the results for user analysis. The unit of measurement employed by the FM is "Photon Count" per millisecond.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Idiopathic full thickness macular hole

  • Duration of symptoms of <30 days for Group 1 and 2

  • Duration of symptoms of 3-12 months for Group 3

  • FTMH size <400µm

  • 18 years

  • Able to give informed consent

  • Compliance for postoperative positioning

Exclusion Criteria:
  • High myopia (≤-3)

  • Traumatic macular hole

  • Prior ocular surgery, including cataract surgery

  • Other ocular diseases compromising the visual acuity (i.e., AMD, diabetic retinopathy, previous vein occlusion)

  • Posterior vitreous detachment (Weiss ring)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Rigshospitalet, Denmark Glostrup Copenhagen Denmark 2600

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Morten Dornonville de la Cour, MD, Prof., Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Asrin Rasul, Medical Doctor, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05828251
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Rigshospitalet-RS studie
First Posted:
Apr 25, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Apr 25, 2023
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Asrin Rasul, Medical Doctor, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 25, 2023