Effectiveness of Corticosteroid vs Ketorolac Shoulder Injections
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes of patients with shoulder pathology treated with either ketorolac or corticosteroid injections, in a randomized double-blinded study. Investigators will compare the effectiveness of ketorolac compared to corticosteroid.
Specific Aim 1:
Hypothesis 1: Injection of the shoulder (in the subacromial space) with Ketorolac will be more effective than corticosteroid injection for the treatment of a variety of shoulder pathologies.
The risks associated with this study primarily concern adverse reactions to the study drugs. The drugs used in this study are not narcotics or habit-forming but can have side effects. The patient's physician will screen for any heart, intestinal, or kidney disease or condition that would increase the chance for the patient to have an unwanted side effect.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
The proposed study is a three arm, double-blinded, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with follow-up immediately after the injection and at day 2, and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12. In this study investigators will compare the effectiveness of ketorolac compared to corticosteroid.
Subjects being seen for a rotator cuff injury will be randomized into one of three treatment groups pertaining to their pathology. The intervention will begin once the subject has consented and answered the Baseline Outcome Shoulder Questionnaire. The Baseline Outcome Questionnaire consists of the Visual Analog Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Short Form-12, and questions pertaining to patient characteristics, injury characteristics, co-morbidities, patient history, medications, and demographics.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Group 1 (marcaine) will receive an injection of 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine |
Drug: Marcaine
Marcaine (control): will receive an injection of 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Group 2 (ketorolac) will receive an injection of 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 30 mg ketorolac x 1 |
Drug: Ketorolac
Ketorolac: will receive an injection of 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 30 mg ketorolac x 1
Other Names:
Drug: Marcaine
Marcaine (control): will receive an injection of 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine
Other Names:
|
Other: Group 3 (kenalog) 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 40 mg triamcinolone x 1. Group 3 is standard of care |
Drug: Marcaine
Marcaine (control): will receive an injection of 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine
Other Names:
Drug: Kenalog
Kenalog: 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 40 mg triamcinolone x 1.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Visual Analog Scale [Baseline - pre-injection]
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale prior to first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
- Visual Analog Scale [Baseline - immediately after the injection]
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale after first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
- Visual Analog Scale [Day 2]
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
- Visual Analog Scale [Week 1]
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
- Visual Analog Scale [Week 2]
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
- Visual Analog Scale [Week 4]
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
- Visual Analog Scale [Week 6]
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
- Visual Analog Scale [Week 12]
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
- American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES) [Baseline]
Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
- American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES) [Week 6]
Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
- American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES) [Week 12]
Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) [Baseline]
Measure the patient's self-reported function on a scale of 0 to 100
- Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) [Week 6]
Measure the patient's self-reported function on a scale of 0 to 100
- Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) [Week 12]
Measure the patient's self-reported function on a scale of 0 to 100
- Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [Baseline]
Sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
- Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [Week 6]
Sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
- Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [Week 12]
Sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
- Short Form 12 (SF-12) [Baseline]
General health survey as measured by the Short Form 12 (SF-12)
- Short Form 12 (SF-12) [Week 6]
General health survey as measured by the Short Form 12 (SF-12)
- Short Form 12 (SF-12) [Week 12]
General health survey as measured by the Short Form 12 (SF-12)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age: > or = 18 years old
-
Rotator Cuff Tendinitis
-
Atraumatic Full-thickness Rotator Cuff Tear
-
Subjects who speak English
-
Women who are of non-childbearing potential
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Age: < 18 years old
-
Prior Shoulder Surgery
-
Fracture
-
Acute Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tear
-
Infection
-
Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus (HbA1c >8)
-
Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure (Hypertension)
-
Recent Prior Shoulder Injection in either the Subacromial space Workers Compensation
-
History of Peptic Ulcer disease (includes both Gastric and Duodenal Ulcers), Gastrointestinal perforation, Inflammatory Bowel disease (Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's disease), or any other gastrointestinal pathology
-
Tumor Involving the Shoulder Region
-
Prior history of gastrointestinal bleeding, allergic reactions, impaired renal function, seizures or cardiac arrhythmias
-
Subject unable to provide informed consent
-
Subjects who don't speak English
-
Patients who are pregnant or lactating at time of screening or are of pregnant bearing age
-
Patients currently receiving an aspirin, NSAID regimen or any other anti-inflammatory agents that could affect inflammation response.
-
Patients taking any anti-platelet agents, warfarin or other anticoagulants, or SSRIs.
-
Patients with any bleeding disorders such as coagulopathy, hypercoagulable state, or platelet disorders including thrombocytopenia.
-
Patients with cardiac disease such as congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, or myocardial infarction.
-
Patients with severe renal failure. Patients with severe liver impairment or active liver disease.
-
Patients with heavy alcohol use; this is defined as consuming 8 or more drinks per week for a woman and 15 or more drinks per week for a man.
-
Patients likely to have severe problems maintaining follow-up, including patients diagnosed with severe psychiatric conditions, patients who live too far outside the hospital's catchment area, patients who are incarcerated and patients who have unstable housing situations. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to bupivacaine or other local anesthetic agent of the amide-type.
-
Patients who have experienced asthma, urticaria, or allergic-type reactions after taking aspirin or other NSAIDs
-
Patients who are allergic to aspirin, ketorolac tromethamine and other NSAIDs.
-
Patients who are currently on probenecid or pentoxifylline as described in the approved label of Ketorolac tromethamine injection.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | United States | 75390 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Michael Khazzam
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Khazzam, MD, 214-645-3300
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Adebajo AO, Nash P, Hazleman BL. A prospective double blind dummy placebo controlled study comparing triamcinolone hexacetonide injection with oral diclofenac 50 mg TDS in patients with rotator cuff tendinitis. J Rheumatol. 1990 Sep;17(9):1207-10.
- Alvarez CM, Litchfield R, Jackowski D, Griffin S, Kirkley A. A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing subacromial injection of betamethasone and xylocaine to xylocaine alone in chronic rotator cuff tendinosis. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb;33(2):255-62.
- Balasubramaniam P, Prathap K. The effect of injection of hydrocortisone into rabbit calcaneal tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972 Nov;54(4):729-34.
- Blair B, Rokito AS, Cuomo F, Jarolem K, Zuckerman JD. Efficacy of injections of corticosteroids for subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1685-9.
- Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213.
- Choi WD, Cho DH, Hong YH, Noh JH, Lee ZI, Byun SD. Effects of subacromial bursa injection with corticosteroid and hyaluronidase according to dosage. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Oct;37(5):668-74. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.5.668. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
- Dogan N, Erdem AF, Gundogdu C, Kursad H, Kizilkaya M. The effects of ketorolac and morphine on articular cartilage and synovium in the rabbit knee joint. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004 Jul;82(7):502-5.
- Gerstenfeld LC, Al-Ghawas M, Alkhiary YM, Cullinane DM, Krall EA, Fitch JL, Webb EG, Thiede MA, Einhorn TA. Selective and nonselective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and experimental fracture-healing. Reversibility of effects after short-term treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):114-25.
- Glassman SD, Rose SM, Dimar JR, Puno RM, Campbell MJ, Johnson JR. The effect of postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration on spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Apr 1;23(7):834-8.
- Gould D, Kelly D, Goldstone L, Gammon J. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs. 2001 Sep;10(5):697-706.
- Hawker, G.A., et al. Measures of Adult Pain. 2011; Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.20543/pdf
- Haws MJ, Kucan JO, Roth AC, Suchy H, Brown RE. The effects of chronic ketorolac tromethamine (toradol) on wound healing. Ann Plast Surg. 1996 Aug;37(2):147-51.
- Ho ML, Chang JK, Wang GJ. Effects of ketorolac on bone repair: A radiographic study in modeled demineralized bone matrix grafted rabbits. Pharmacology. 1998 Sep;57(3):148-59.
- Itzkowitch D, Ginsberg F, Leon M, Bernard V, Appelboom T. Peri-articular injection of tenoxicam for painful shoulders: a double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 1996 Nov;15(6):604-9.
- Jean YH, Wen ZH, Chang YC, Hsieh SP, Tang CC, Wang YH, Wong CS. Intra-articular injection of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor parecoxib attenuates osteoarthritis progression in anterior cruciate ligament-transected knee in rats: role of excitatory amino acids. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Jun;15(6):638-45. Epub 2007 Jan 2.
- Kapetanos G. The effect of the local corticosteroids on the healing and biomechanical properties of the partially injured tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Mar;(163):170-9.
- Karthikeyan S, Kwong HT, Upadhyay PK, Parsons N, Drew SJ, Griffin D. A double-blind randomised controlled study comparing subacromial injection of tenoxicam or methylprednisolone in patients with subacromial impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jan;92(1):77-82. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22137.
- Kenalog: Drug Summary. Available from: http://www.pdr.net/drug-summary/kenalog-40?druglabelid=2494
- Kenaolg Package Insert. July 2014; Available from: http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_kenalog-40.pdf.
- Ketorolac: Drug Class and Mechanism. 2014; Available from: http://www.medicinenet.com/ketorolac-oral/article.htm
- Koester MC, Dunn WR, Kuhn JE, Spindler KP. The efficacy of subacromial corticosteroid injection in the treatment of rotator cuff disease: A systematic review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Jan;15(1):3-11. Review.
- Marder RA, Kim SH, Labson JD, Hunter JC. Injection of the subacromial bursa in patients with rotator cuff syndrome: a prospective, randomized study comparing the effectiveness of different routes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Aug 15;94(16):1442-7.
- Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;11(6):587-94.
- Min KS, St Pierre P, Ryan PM, Marchant BG, Wilson CJ, Arrington ED. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 May;22(5):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
- Mullis BH, Copland ST, Weinhold PS, Miclau T, Lester GE, Bos GD. Effect of COX-2 inhibitors and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on a mouse fracture model. Injury. 2006 Sep;37(9):827-37. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
- Ogbru, O. Marcaine - Drug Class and Mechanism. 6/27/2014; Available from: http://www.medicinenet.com/bupivicaine-injection/article.htm.
- O'Keefe RJ, Tiyapatanaputi P, Xie C, Li TF, Clark C, Zuscik MJ, Chen D, Drissi H, Schwarz E, Zhang X. COX-2 has a critical role during incorporation of structural bone allografts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Apr;1068:532-42.
- Oxlund H. The influence of a local injection of cortisol on the mechanical properties of tendons and ligaments and the indirect effect on skin. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980 Apr;51(2):231-8.
- Park SY, Moon SH, Park MS, Oh KS, Lee HM. The effects of ketorolac injected via patient controlled analgesia postoperatively on spinal fusion. Yonsei Med J. 2005 Apr 30;46(2):245-51.
- Penning LI, de Bie RA, Walenkamp GH. The effectiveness of injections of hyaluronic acid or corticosteroid in patients with subacromial impingement: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Sep;94(9):1246-52. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.28750.
- Pradhan BB, Tatsumi RL, Gallina J, Kuhns CA, Wang JC, Dawson EG. Ketorolac and spinal fusion: does the perioperative use of ketorolac really inhibit spinal fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2079-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818396f4.
- Prisk V, Huard J. Muscle injuries and repair: the role of prostaglandins and inflammation. Histol Histopathol. 2003 Oct;18(4):1243-56. doi: 10.14670/HH-18.1243. Review.
- Radi ZA, Khan NK. Effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition on bone, tendon, and ligament healing. Inflamm Res. 2005 Sep;54(9):358-66. Review.
- Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, Iannotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
- Sucato DJ, Lovejoy JF, Agrawal S, Elerson E, Nelson T, McClung A. Postoperative ketorolac does not predispose to pseudoarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 1;33(10):1119-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f6a2a.
- Wei AS, Callaci JJ, Juknelis D, Marra G, Tonino P, Freedman KB, Wezeman FH. The effect of corticosteroid on collagen expression in injured rotator cuff tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1331-8.
- Wiggins ME, Fadale PD, Barrach H, Ehrlich MG, Walsh WR. Healing characteristics of a type I collagenous structure treated with corticosteroids. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):279-88.
- STU-2021-0232