FOAL: Functional Outcome After Anastomotic Leak After Oesophagectomies

Sponsor
Stefan Gutknecht (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05945654
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
5.9
5.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The main surgical treatment for oesophageal cancer is a curative resection, mostly performed according to Ivor Lewis. However, despite careful work and refined surgical techniques, anastomotic leakage (AL) occurs in more than 1/10 of the patients. This severe complication normally requires immediate intervention, while over the last 10 years, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has become the crucial therapy for broken-down anastomosis. The hypothesis is that despite suffering a severe complication, the subjective swallow function is not impaired in patients treated by EVT after an anastomotic leak, compared to patients without AL.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Anastomotic Leak after Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy

Detailed Description

The investigators will select patients after oesophagectomy and perform a structured interview regarding their quality of life and subjective swallow function. Results will be compared according to defined subgroups, especially patients with and without anastomotic leak.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
30 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Control
Time Perspective:
Other
Official Title:
Subjective Functional Outcome After Oesophagectomy With and Without Anastomotic Leak
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2023
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 31, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 28, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Anastomotic leak

Patients who had an Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy and suffered an anastomotic leak (AL) postoperatively. AL, as defined according to ECCG (Esophagectomy Complication Consensus Group) criteria 1-3.

Procedure: Anastomotic Leak after Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy
Surgical resection of the esophagus with oesophagogastrostomy. Groups depend on postoperative complication

No anastomotic leak

Patients who had an Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy and had no AL postoperatively, ECCG 0.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Swallow function by questionnaires: Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) [earliest 6 months postoperatively]

    This questionnaire consists of 17 questions and is mainly based on a visual analog scale (VAS) to assess functional swallowing. The sum of all questions ranges from 0-1700. The calculated upper limit of the reference interval is 234 in a non-dysphagic population. A higher score represents a more severe dysphagia.

  2. Swallow function by questionnaires: Eckardt Score (ES) [earliest 6 months postoperatively]

    The ES is a questionnaire with four items (weight loss, chest pain, regurgitation, and dysphagia) initially used to evaluate achalasia. The maximum score is 12; the higher the score, the more trouble patients have with swallowing.

  3. Swallow function by questionnaires: Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ) [earliest 6 months postoperatively]

    The BEDQ has 10 questions to score dysphagia specifically. The questions are answered using a Likert scale (low to high), which sums up to a score ranging from 0 (asymptomatic) to 40.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Quality of life by questionnaires EORTC-C30 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Cancer 30) [earliest 6 months postoperatively]

    The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has a quality-of-life questionnaire for cancer patients. Depending on the tumor localization, a different combination of modules is used. This study combines the general 'C30' module with 30 items and the supplemental oesophagogastric 'OG25' module with 25 items. The transformed score of the C30 module ranges from 0 to 100. A high score represents a high level of symptomatology.

  2. Quality of life by questionnaires EORTC-OG25 (Oesophagogastric-25) [earliest 6 months postoperatively]

    As stated above, in addition to the EORTC-C30 module, the EORTC OG25 module is used. These items can be analyzed for several symptoms and are standardized by a formula to a value ranging from 0 to 100. Again a higher score represents more severe symptoms.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients who received an Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy with reconstruction due to any reason

  • Patients older than 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with achalasia

  • inability to understand study procedure or to provide informed consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Stadtspital Zurich, Triemli Zürich ZH Switzerland 8063

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Stefan Gutknecht

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefan Gutknecht, MD, Stadtspital Zurich

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Stefan Gutknecht, Principal Investigator, Stadtspital Zürich
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05945654
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BASEC 2022-01799
First Posted:
Jul 14, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jul 14, 2023
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 14, 2023