G5® Mobile Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Automated vs. Manual Sensor Applicator
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Comparison of G5® Mobile Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy When Using an Automated Applicator vs. a Manual Sensor Applicator
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
The objective of the study is to demonstrate the performance, i.e. efficacy of the G5x System with the automated applicator is no worse than that of the commercial Dexcom G4 TM PLATINUM Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (G4 System) with the manual applicator.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
CGM Users
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- proportion of blood glucose values, compared between CGM and a lab glucose analyzer that are matched relative to a diabetes accuracy measurement of %20/20 mg/dL [7 days]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Ages 2 or older
-
Diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes or Type 2 diabetes
-
Willing to participate in a clinic session involving venous sampling for evaluation of study end point
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Use of acetaminophen
-
Known allergy to medical-grade adhesives
-
Pregnancy
-
Hematocrit outside specification of the study-assigned blood glucose meter
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AMCR Institute | Escondido | California | United States | 92025 |
2 | Rocky Mountain Diabetes and Osteoporosis Center | Idaho Falls | Idaho | United States | 83404 |
3 | Joslin Diabetes Center | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02215 |
4 | Clinical Trials of Texas | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- DexCom, Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- PTL-901800