STOPEROPCHEM: The Role of Postoperative Cycles in the Perioperative Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer

Sponsor
Medical University of Lublin (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01787539
Collaborator
St Johns' Oncology Center in Lublin (Other)
180
2
2
108
90
0.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Taking into account the substantial doubts concerning the potential benefit of postoperative part in the perioperative chemotherapy regimen we designed a study assessing value of this approach in gastric cancer. To improve compliance with a protocol regimen of this aggressive combined therapy we replaced tested in the MAGIC trial ECF regimen with more effective and better tolerable EOX chemotherapy regimen. The value of postoperative three-cycle EOX regimen will be tested in patients with locoregionally advanced gastric cancer with positive pathological response to preoperative three-cycle EOX chemotherapy regimen. The patients will be randomized to the postoperative chemotherapy or to the follow-up arm.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Postoperative Chemotherapy
Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

The MAGIC trial, also considered the "milestone" study, definitely proved that neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the outcome of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Resection was considered curative in 79% under combination therapy versus in 69% of only operated patients (P = 0.02), 2-year survival rates were 50 and 41%, and 5-year-survival rates were 36 and 23% (P = 0.009), respectively. The substantial weak point of the MAGIC trial remains the fact that only about 40% of the patients received the full dosage of scheduled postoperative chemotherapy, mainly due to intolerance or toxicity reasons.

The noninferiority in relation to survival of capecitabine to 5-FU in triplet regimens for the treatment of patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer was demonstrated in the large multicenter randomized phase III, REAL-2 study, including 1002 patients. Capecitabine has overcome the doubts concerning the potential efficacy of oral drug administration in patients with gastric carcinoma, especially in relation to those patients who have undergone partial or total gastrectomy. The same study demonstrated the noninferiority of oxaliplatin versus cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer and confirmed the acceptable tolerability profile of this third-generation platinum analogue. It was anticipated that the use of these newer agents as components of triplet regimens would reduce toxicity and thereby render an alternative to the standard ECF combination easier to handle as a consequence of replacing the cisplatin component with oxaliplatin, replacing the infusional 5-fluorouracil component with oral capecitabine in EOX regimen. Furthermore, achieving a median overall survival time of 11.2 months, the EOX regimen appeared to be more active than ECF (median overall survival time, 9.9 months), with the higher 1-year survival rate 47% vs 38%, respectively. Compared with the ECF regimen, EOX was associated with significantly lower rates of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and grade 2 alopecia, but significantly higher rates of grade 3 or 4 lethargy, diarrhea, and peripheral neuropathy. Based on the results of the REAL study, EOX is therefore tolerable, and at least as active as ECF. This modified regimen could therefore be considered to be a new standard treatment and may be an appropriate reference regimen for future studies in advanced gastric cancer.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
180 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Role of Postoperative Chemotherapy Cycles in the Combined Modality Therapy of Gastric Cancer With Perioperative Chemotherapy and Surgery in Pathological Responders
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2013
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2017
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Complete Perioperative Chemotherapy

Preoperative chemotherapy with EOX regimen: Epirubicin with intravenous bolus at a dose of 50 mg/m2 an on day 1; Oxaliplatin with intravenous infusion during a 2-hour period at a dose of 130 mg/m2; Capecitabine administrated orally at a twice daily dose of 625 mg /m2 during 21 days. Treatment cycles will be repeated every 3 weeks. Surgery: total or subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. The surgical resection will be conducted 4-6 weeks after preoperative chemotherapy. Postoperative chemotherapy will be administrated in patients with tumor regression grade 0, 1, 2 randomized to perioperative chemotherapy and will be initiated 6 to 12 weeks after surgery with the same regimen as in the preoperative part.

Drug: Postoperative Chemotherapy
Postoperative chemotherapy with EOX regimen: Epirubicin with intravenous bolus at a dose of 50 mg/m2 an on day 1; Oxaliplatin with intravenous infusion during a 2-hour period at a dose of 130 mg/m2; Capecitabine administrated orally at a twice daily dose of 625 mg /m2 during 21 days. Treatment cycles will be repeated every 3 weeks. Postoperative chemotherapy will be administrated in patients with tumor regression grade 0, 1, 2 randomized to perioperative chemotherapy and will be initiated 6 to 12 weeks after surgery.

No Intervention: Preoperative Chemotherapy

Preoperative chemotherapy with EOX regimen: Epirubicin with intravenous bolus at a dose of 50 mg/m2 an on day 1; Oxaliplatin with intravenous infusion during a 2-hour period at a dose of 130 mg/m2; Capecitabine administrated orally at a twice daily dose of 625 mg /m2 during 21 days. Treatment cycles will be repeated every 3 weeks. Surgery: total or subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. The surgical resection will be conducted 4-6 weeks after preoperative chemotherapy. Patients with tumor regression grade 0, 1, 2 randomized to preoperative chemotherapy will not undergo postoperative chemotherapy and will be followed-up.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. cancer free and overall survival [5 years]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. overall and severe toxicity rate [8 weeks]

  2. chemotherapy related mortality [8 weeks]

  3. the rate of dose reduction for chemotherapeutics [3 months]

  4. the rate of chemotherapy cessation [3 months]

Other Outcome Measures

  1. quality of life [1 year]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • histopathologically confirmed gastric cancer

  • potentially resectable, local or locoregional cancer with clinical staging cT2-4aN0-3M0. A clinical assessment of location, resectability and staging will be performed based on endoscopy, barium swallow, endoscopic ultrasound, multidetector computed tomography and diagnostic laparoscopy with cytology washing.

  • medically fit to undergo a major abdominal surgery and in general condition allowing to tolerate long-lasting chemotherapy (Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70, ECOG 0-1)

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding.

  • Diagnosed other malignancy and/or chemotherapy administrated within the last 5 years

  • Gastric remnant cancer;

  • Early Gastric Cancer;

  • Irresectable or disseminated cancer with distant organ metastases and/or peritoneal spreading and/or positive cytology washing

  • Poor performance status measured by Karnofsky index < 60 or ECOG < 1

  • Clinically important active systemic disease: unstable diabetes, circulatory failure of NYHA III or IV, unstable arterial hypertension, unstable coronary heart disease, recent heart infarct or brain insult within the last 6 months, severe COPD, peripheral neuropathy of grade 2-4;

  • Severe hematological abnormalities: HGB < 10.0 gm/dL and/or neutropenia < 1500 /mm3; PLT < 100 000 /mm3.

  • Severe renal dysfunction requiring peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis or hemofiltration or oliguria <20ml/h.

  • Severe liver dysfunction: acute or chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, liver failure, abnormal liver testing: ALAT or ASPAT or ALP >2.5 - 5.0 × upper limit; total bilirubin

2 x upper limit.

  • Concommitant infection

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Second Department of General & Gastrointestinal Surgery & Surgical Oncology of the Alimentary Tract, Medical University of Lublin Lublin Lubelskie Poland 20-081
2 St. John's Cancer Center Lublin Lubelskie Poland 20-090

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medical University of Lublin
  • St Johns' Oncology Center in Lublin

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tomasz Skoczylas, MD, PhD, Second Department of General & Gastrointestinal Surgery & Surgical Oncology of the Alimentary Tract, Medical University of Lublin
  • Principal Investigator: Grzegorz Wallner, Professor, Second Department of General & Gastrointestinal Surgery & Surgical Oncology of the Alimentary Tract, Medical University of Lublin
  • Principal Investigator: Elżbieta Starosławska, MD, PhD, St Johns' Oncology Center in Lublin
  • Principal Investigator: Tomasz Kubiatowski, MD, PhD, St Johns' Oncology Center in Lublin

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Tomasz Skoczylas, MD, PhD, Medical University of Lublin
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01787539
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • GC-COMB-0254/275/2012-MUL
  • GC-0254/282/2011/275/2012-MUL
First Posted:
Feb 8, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Feb 8, 2013
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2013
Keywords provided by Tomasz Skoczylas, MD, PhD, Medical University of Lublin
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 8, 2013