the Clinical Efficacy of Robotic and Laparoscopic Radical Total Gastrectomy in Locally Advanced Middle and Upper Gastric Cancer

Sponsor
Fujian Medical University (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05235932
Collaborator
Chinese PLA General Hospital (Other), Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital (Other), The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (Other), Lanzhou Military Region General Hospital (Other), Gansu Provincial Hospital (Other), Southwest Hospital, China (Other), First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (Other), First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University (Other), Xiangya Second Hospital (Other), The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and Hebei Tumor Hospital (Other), The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (Other), The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (Other)
570
1
2
60
9.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To evaluate the clinical efficacy (safety, feasibility and long-term efficacy) of robotic radical total gastrectomy and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy in patients with locally advanced middle and upper gastric adenocarcinoma (CT2-4A, N-/+, M0) .

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Robotic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy
  • Procedure: Laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy
N/A

Detailed Description

In the field of gastrectomy, Hashizume et al. first reported robotic gastrectomy in 2002. Since then, reports on the safety and feasibility of the application of robotic surgical system in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC) have gradually increased. Reports of robotic surgery for GC are increasing, especially in Asia. Several studies confirmed the advantages of robotic gastrectomy when compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, whether robotic radical total gastrectomy is noninferior to laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy remains unclear. The investigator first carried out this study in the world to evaluate the efficacy of robotic radical total gastrectomy versus laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy for GC.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
570 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study of the Clinical Efficacy of Robotic and Laparoscopic Radical Total Gastrectomy in Locally Advanced Middle and Upper Gastric Cancer
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Feb 20, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Feb 20, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 20, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Robotic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

After exploration and randomization, patients received robotic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

Procedure: Robotic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy
Most surgical procedures are performed using the robot system.

Active Comparator: Laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

After exploration and randomization, patients received laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy

Procedure: Laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy
Without the robot system, Most surgical procedures are performed using laparoscopic equipment.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. 3-year disease free survival rate [36 months]

    3-year disease free survival rate

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Morbidity rates [30 days]

    This is for the early postoperative complication, which defined as the event observed within 30 days after surgery.

  2. 3-year overall survival rate [36 months]

    3-year overall survival rate

  3. 3-year recurrence pattern [36 months]

    Recurrence patterns are classified into five categories at the time of first diagnosis: locoregional, hematogenous, peritoneal, distant lymph node, and mixed type.

  4. intraoperative morbidity rates [1 day]

    The intraoperative postoperative morbidity rates are defined as the rates of event observed within operation.

  5. overall postoperative serious morbidity rates [30 days]

    Refers to the incidence of early postoperative complication which is graded as Clavien-Dindo IIIA or higher

  6. Total Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes [1 day]

    Total Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes

  7. postoperative recovery course [30 days]

    Duration of postoperative hospital stay in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.

  8. postoperative nutritional status [3, 6, 9 and 12 months]

    The variation of weight on postoperative 3, 6, 9 and 12 months are used to access the postoperative nutritional status.

  9. inflammatory immune response [Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days]

    The variation of white blood cell count from peripheral blood before operation and on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 are recorded to access the inflammatory and immune response

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • 1.Age between 18 and 75 years 2.The primary gastric lesion was histopathologically diagnosed as middle and upper gastric adenocarcinoma (papillary adenocarcinoma PAP, tubular adenocarcinoma TUB, mucinous adenocarcinoma MUC, signed-ring cell carcinoma SIG, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma POR) by endoscopic biopsy.

3.Preoperative clinical stages were CT2-4A、 N-/+、and M0 (according to AJCC-8th TNM tumor staging) 4.Excepting to perform radical total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection can achieve R0 resection.

5.American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score class I, II, or III 6.Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Preoperative examination suggested disease staging cT1, N-/+, and M0 (according to AJCC-8th TNM tumor staging )

  2. Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding

  3. Severe mental disorder

  4. History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except laparoscopic cholecystectomy)

  5. History of previous gastrectomy(except for ESD/EMR for gastric cancer )

  6. Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node over 3 cm by preoperative imaging

  7. History of other malignant disease within the past five years

  8. History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy

  9. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months

  10. History of cerebrovascular accident within past six months

  11. History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month

  12. Requirement for simultaneous surgery for other disease(except laparoscopic cholecystectomy)

  13. Emergency surgery due to complication (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer

  14. FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second)<50% of predicted values

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Fujian Medical University Union Hospital Fuzhou Fujian China 350001

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Fujian Medical University
  • Chinese PLA General Hospital
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
  • Lanzhou Military Region General Hospital
  • Gansu Provincial Hospital
  • Southwest Hospital, China
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
  • First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
  • Xiangya Second Hospital
  • The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and Hebei Tumor Hospital
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Chang-ming Huang, MD, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Chang-Ming Huang, Prof., Professor, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05235932
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2022-02
First Posted:
Feb 11, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Feb 11, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Chang-Ming Huang, Prof., Professor, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 11, 2022