Re-EValuating the Inhibition of Stress Erosions (REVISE) Trial

Sponsor
McMaster University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03374800
Collaborator
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Other), Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (Other), Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group (Other), National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (Other)
4,800
69
2
65.7
69.6
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Patients who are critically ill in the in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), especially those who need a breathing machine, can develop ulcers in the stomach that bleed. To prevent bleeding, many such patients around the world receive a drug called pantoprazole that decreases acid production. However, today, compared to decades ago, critically ill patients rarely develop gastrointestinal bleeding. This decrease is likely due to modern medicine, better resuscitation and earlier feeding. There may also be harms associated with pantoprazole and other drugs that reduce acid levels in the stomach including lung infections (pneumonia) and bowel infections (clostridium difficile). Studies in this area are old and of modest quality. Therefore, it is difficult to know whether pantoprazole does decrease stomach bleeding these days, or whether the possible harms of lung and bowel infections are actually more common and more serious problems. The goal of this international study is to determine if, in critically ill patients using breathing machines, the use of pantoprazole is effective in preventing bleeding from stomach ulcers or whether it causes more problems such as lung infection (pneumonia) and bowel infection (Clostridium difficile), or whether pantoprazole has no effect at all. Whether the harms are worth the benefits, and whether the benefits are worth the costs, will be determined by an economic analysis to inform patients, families, clinicians, and healthcare systems globally.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Background: For 40 years, pharmacologic prevention of stress ulcer-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with acid suppression has been the standard of care for mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Worldwide, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are more commonly used than histamine-2-receptor antagonists. Observational studies and the latest network meta-analysis suggest that PPIs increase the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). However, a recent large randomized trial showed that pantoprazole had no impact on the primary outcome of 90-day mortality. The secondary outcome (a composite of pneumonia, gastrointestinal bleeding, CDI and acute myocardial ischemia) was not different between the groups. Although pantoprazole was associated with a significantly lower rate of GI bleeding, some bleeding events required no blood transfusion, endoscopy or other diagnostic or therapeutic interventions, calling into question whether these bleeds were truly patient-important. Further, patients with high illness severity on pantoprazole had a significant, unexplainable higher risk of death than those receiving placebo.

REVISE Pilot Trial: We completed the 91-patient REVISE Pilot Trial in Canada, Australia and Saudi Arabia, demonstrating a high consent rate (77.8%); recruitment rate (2.6 patients/month/center); and protocol adherence (96.8%), thereby successfully establishing the feasibility of a larger REVISE Trial.

Objectives of the REVISE Trial: To determine, among mechanically ventilated patients, the effect of pantoprazole versus placebo on the primary efficacy outcome of clinically important upper GI bleeding, and the primary safety outcome of 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes are VAP, CDI, acute kidney injury, hospital mortality and patient-important GI bleeding. Tertiary outcomes are transfused packed red blood cells, serum creatinine, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of ICU stay and duration of hospital stay.

Methods: We will include 4,800 ICU patients >18 years old who have an anticipated duration of mechanical ventilation of ≥48 hours. Exclusion criteria are acute or recent GI bleeding, dual antiplatelet therapy, combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, hopeless prognosis or intent to withdraw advanced life support, and previous enrolment in this or a confounding trial. Patients will be randomized in a fixed 1:1 allocation, stratified by center and pre-ICU acid suppression ('start or no start' strata, and 'continue or discontinue' strata). Research Coordinators will obtain informed consent using a deferred or a priori consent model. Study Pharmacists will obtain concealed allocation from the REVISE website; all research team and clinical team members, patients and families will be blinded. Patients will receive pantoprazole 40 mg or identical placebo intravenously daily while in ICU up to 90 days or until: 1) successful discontinuation of mechanical ventilation for >48 hours; 2) development of clinically important GI bleeding, or 3) death in ICU. Analyses will be by intention-to-treat and per protocol.

Collaborations: REVISE will be conducted in collaboration with the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, the Australian and New Zealand Critical Care Trials Group, other consortia and interested investigators, under the auspices of the International Forum for Acute Care Trialists.

Ethical Imperative: Many factors converge to underscore the ethical imperative for REVISE. Critical care has evolved, research standards have improved, epidemiology may have changed, the risk:benefit and cost:benefit ratios of prophylaxis may have shifted. Thus, stress ulcer prophylaxis may need to be REVISED.

Relevance: Most mechanically ventilated patients around the world receive daily stress ulcer prophylaxis, although variation exists such that some centers do not use any. Many RCTs of stress ulcer prophylaxis were conducted 10-30 years ago, several are at moderate or high risk of bias, and cointerventions may not reflect current critical care. A recent large trial raised concerns about death associated with pantoprazole in the most severely ill patient subgroup. Although GI bleeding events were less frequent, they may not have been patient-important, and there were no other benefits observed. Consensus in the scientific and clinical community is that equipoise remains regarding whether routine use of pantoprazole should continue for stress ulcer prophylaxis during critical illness. The question is especially important for patients who are receiving acid suppression pre-ICU, those who are receiving enteral nutrition, and those at high risk of death. Today, infectious complications of PPIs have emerged as potentially more common and serious than upper GI bleeding. The number needed to prophylax to prevent 1 GI bleed and the cost per GI bleed averted may be very high; furthermore, the number needed to harm to cause 1 episode of VAP or CDI may be low. Recent practice guidelines are conflicting. Remaining doubts about the effectiveness and safety of PPIs urge re-examination of universal prophylaxis for possible de-adoption. Aligned with the 'Choosing Wisely' Campaign, REVISE and the companion economic evaluation (E-REVISE) will be incorporated into guidelines to inform global practice.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
4800 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
A prospective, international, multicentre, parallel group, concealed, blinded, randomized trial in critically ill mechanically ventilated adultsA prospective, international, multicentre, parallel group, concealed, blinded, randomized trial in critically ill mechanically ventilated adults
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
blinded study drug and placebo
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Re-EValuating the Inhibition of Stress Erosions: Prophylaxis Against Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Critically Ill (The REVISE) Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 9, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (0.9% saline)

Withholding Stress ulcer prophylaxis (intravenous 0.9% saline as placebo)

Drug: Placebo (0.9% saline)
normal saline
Other Names:
  • normal saline; NaCl 0.9%
  • Active Comparator: Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (Pantoprazole)

    pantoprazole 40mg powder for injection reconstituted with 0.9% saline

    Drug: Pantoprazole
    40 mg powder for injection reconstituted with 0.9% saline
    Other Names:
  • Protonix
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Rate of clinically important gastro-intestinal bleeding [90 days (In ICU or resulting in ICU readmission, censored at 90 days after randomization)]

      Clinically important GI bleeding requires the presence of overt GI bleeding which is defined as one of the following; Hematemesis Overt nasogastric bleeding Melena Hematochezia PLUS (in the absence of another cause), at least one of the following in the 24 hours following overt GI bleeding: Haemodynamic change defined as a spontaneous decrease in invasively monitored mean arterial pressure or non-invasive systolic or diastolic blood pressure of 20 mmHg or more or an orthostatic increase in pulse rate of 20 beats/minute and a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 10 mmHg, with or without vasopressor initiation, or increase Vasopressor initiation A decrease in haemoglobin of ≥ 20 g/l in a 24-hour period or less, Transfusion of ≥2 units of packed red blood cells within 24 hours of bleeding to maintain stable haemoglobin or haemodynamics, or Need for therapeutic intervention (e.g. angiography, surgery or endoscopic treatment of bleeding).

    2. Primary Safety Outcome: 90 Day Mortality [90 days post randomization]

      Mortality status at day 90 post randomization

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Rate of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in ICU [90 Days (while in ICU,censored at 90 days after randomization)]

      Diagnostic criteria for VAP include: previous mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours, a new, progressive or persistent radiographic infiltrate on chest X-ray (without other obvious cause) plus at least 2 of the following 4 features: fever or hypothermia (temperature >38 °C or <36 °C) relative leukopenia or leukocytosis (WBC<4.0 or >12 x 10^9/L) purulent sputum gas exchange deterioration

    2. Rate of clostridium difficile associated infection [90 days (during the index hospital admission, censored at 90 days)]

      We will use clinical features (diarrhea, ileus, toxic megacolon) and either microbiological evidence of toxin producing Clostridium difficile or Pseudomembranous colitis on colonoscopy.

    3. Rate of acute renal failure in the ICU [90 Days (In the ICU, censored at 90 days)]

      Peak serum creatinine or initiation of treatment with renal replacement therapy in ICU

    4. Duration of mechanical ventilation [90 Days (In the ICU, censored at 90 days)]

      Duration of mechanical ventilation

    5. Duration of ICU stay [90 Days (duration of index hospital admission)]

      Number of days in ICU

    6. Duration of hospital stay [90 Days (duration of index hospital admission)]

      Number of days in hospital

    7. Rate of new treatment with renal replacement therapy in ICU [While in ICU,censored at 90 days after randomization]

      Initiation of renal replacement therapy while in ICU (i.e., dialysis)

    8. Rate of all-cause-in-hospital mortality [While in hospital, censored at 90 days after randomization]

      hospital mortality

    9. Rate of patient important GI bleeding in ICU or resulting in ICU readmission, censored at 90 days after randomization [Censored at 90 days after randomization]

      Patient important GI bleeding in ICU or resulting in ICU readmission, censored at 90 days after randomization

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Age 18 years or more.

    2. Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in an ICU and in the opinion of the treating ICU physician mechanical ventilation will not be discontinued before the end of the day after tomorrow.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    1. The treating clinician considers either Pantoprazole or placebo are indicated or contraindicated for this patient.

    2. Pantoprazole contraindicated for patient due to local product information;

    Australia/New Zealand;

    • being treated with HIV protease inhibitors atazanavir or nelfinavir

    • being treated with high dose methotrexate (i.e., greater than 300 mg as part of a chemotherapy regimen).

    • documented cirrhosis or severe liver disease (for example as indicated by an INR greater than 5.0 due to underlying liver disease).

    Canada;

    • being treated with rilpivirine or atazanavir
    1. Patients in whom a PPI or histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) is indicated due to active bleeding or increased bleeding risk, defined as patients with acute GI bleeding, severe oesophagitis or peptic ulcer disease within the previous 8 weeks, Zollinger Ellison syndrome, Barrett's oesophagus or any previous admission to hospital because of upper GI bleeding (patients receiving PPIs for mild dyspepsia or mild gastroesophageal reflux disease or an uncertain indication are not excluded).

    2. Received invasive mechanical ventilation during this ICU admission for 72 hours or more.

    3. Patients who have received more than 24 hours treatment (i.e., more than one daily dose equivalent) with a PPI or H2RA during this ICU admission.

    4. Being treated with or need for dual anti-platelet therapy.

    5. Admitted for palliative care or the ICU physician is not committed to continuing life-sustaining therapies at the time of enrolment.

    6. Known or suspected pregnancy.

    7. Physician, patient, or substitute decision maker (SDM) declines.

    8. Previously enrolled in the REVISE trial

    9. Enrolled in another trial for which co-enrolment is not approved.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Nebraska - Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska United States 987400
    2 Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital Bankstown New South Wales Australia 2200
    3 Blacktown Hospital Blacktown New South Wales Australia 2148
    4 Gosford Hospital Gosford New South Wales Australia 2250
    5 Nepean Hospital Kingswood New South Wales Australia 2747
    6 Royal North Shore Hospital Saint Leonards New South Wales Australia 2050
    7 Wollongong Hospital Wollongong New South Wales Australia 2500
    8 Royal Brisbane Womens Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia 4029
    9 Ipswich Hospital Ipswich Queensland Australia 4305
    10 Logan Hospital Meadowbrook Queensland Australia 4131
    11 Mater Hospital South Brisbane Queensland Australia 4101
    12 Toowoomba Hospital Toowoomba Queensland Australia 4350,
    13 Princess Alexandra Hospital Woolloongabba Queensland Australia 4102
    14 Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia 5000
    15 Bendigo Health Bendigo Victoria Australia 3550
    16 Austin Hospital Heidelberg Victoria Australia 3084
    17 Alfred Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia 3004
    18 Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia 3050
    19 Epworth Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia 3121
    20 Felicio Rocho Foundation - Hospital Felício Rocho Belo Horizonte Brazil
    21 Sociedade Hospitalar Angelina Caron Campina Grande Do Sul Brazil
    22 Santa Casa de Misericordia de Votuporanga Votuporanga Brazil
    23 Foothills Hospital Calgary Alberta Canada
    24 Peter Lougheed Hospital Calgary Alberta Canada
    25 Royal Alexandra Hospital Edmonton Alberta Canada T5H 3V9
    26 University of Alberta Hospital Edmonton Alberta Canada T6G 2B7
    27 Nanaimo Regional General Hospital Nanaimo British Columbia Canada V9S 2B7
    28 Royal Columbia Hospital New Westminster British Columbia Canada
    29 Vancouver Island Health Authority Victoria British Columbia Canada
    30 St. Boniface Hospital Winnipeg Manitoba Canada R2H 2A6
    31 Health Science Center Winnipeg Winnipeg Manitoba Canada R3A 1R9
    32 Grace Hospital Winnipeg Manitoba Canada R3J 3M7
    33 Saint John Regional Hospital Saint John New Brunswick Canada E2L 4L2
    34 QEII Health Sciences Centre Halifax Nova Scotia Canada B3H 2Y9
    35 William Osler Hospital, McKenzie Health, Brampton Civic Hospital Brampton Ontario Canada L6R 3J7
    36 Brantford General Hospital Brantford Ontario Canada
    37 Joseph Brant Hospital Burlington Ontario Canada L7S 1W7
    38 Cambridge Memorial Hospital Cambridge Ontario Canada N1R 3G2
    39 St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton Hamilton Ontario Canada L9N 4A6
    40 Hamilton Health Science Center - General Hospital Hamilton Ontario Canada
    41 Hamilton Health Science Center - Juravinski Hospital Hamilton Ontario Canada
    42 Kingston General Hospital Kingston Ontario Canada
    43 Grand River Hospital Kitchener Ontario Canada N2G 1G3
    44 St. Mary's Hospital Kitchener Ontario Canada N2M 1B2
    45 London Health Science Center (LHSC) - University Hospital London Ontario Canada
    46 London Health Science Center (LHSC) - Victoria Hospital London Ontario Canada
    47 North York General Hospital North York Ontario Canada M2K 1E1
    48 Ottawa Health Research Institute - OHRI (General and Civic Hospital) Ottawa Ontario Canada
    49 Niagara Health Services - St. Catharine's Hospital St. Catharines Ontario Canada
    50 Sunnybrook Health Science Center Toronto Ontario Canada M4N 3M5
    51 Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada M5G 1X5
    52 University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada M5T 2S8
    53 St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada M6R 1B5
    54 St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada
    55 Windsor Regional Hospital Windsor Ontario Canada N8W 1L9
    56 Centre de recherche de l'Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis Lévis Quebec Canada
    57 Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont Montréal Quebec Canada H1T 2M4
    58 Center Hospital University Montreal (CHUM) Montréal Quebec Canada H2X 0A9
    59 Centre Universitaire de Santé McGill / McGill University Health Centre Montréal Quebec Canada
    60 CIUSS du Nord de l'île de Montréal - Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal Montréal Quebec Canada
    61 McGill University Health Centre - Montreal General Hospital Montréal Quebec Canada
    62 CHU de Québec-Université Laval - Hôpital Enfant-Jésus Quebec City Quebec Canada
    63 Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec Laval, Quebec Quebec City Quebec Canada
    64 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Quebec Canada J1H 5N4
    65 Regina General Hospital Regina Saskatchewan Canada S4P 0W5
    66 AL-Amiri Hospital Kuwait City Kuwait
    67 Maroof International Hospital Islamabad Pakistan
    68 King Abdulaziz Medical Center Riyadh Saudi Arabia 11426
    69 Guys & St. Thomas Hospital London New Westminster United Kingdom SE1 7EH

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • McMaster University
    • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
    • Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
    • Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group
    • National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Deborah Cook, MD, McMaster University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    McMaster University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03374800
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CCT38473
    First Posted:
    Dec 15, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 16, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Undecided
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Undecided
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 16, 2022