Bedside Silo Versus Operative Closure for Gastroschisis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The hypothesis is that there is no difference between bedside silo placement and operative closure in return of bowel function, ventilator dependence, or length of stay.
The primary outcome variable between the two techniques will be determined from this study that can then be used to develop a definitive study. The likely variables will be length of time to meet discharge criteria, length of hospitalization, time to full feedings, time on mechanical ventilation and total hospital charges.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
A strategy of blocked randomization will be utilized. The randomization will be blocked in groups of 4. Randomization sequence will be kept by the principal investigator. After permission is obtained, the next assignment will be obtained. This method assures that the physician obtaining permission will be blind to the treatment group.
The treatment groups will consist of the same medical management, feeding regimen and discharge criteria.
The interventions will be either bedside silo or operative attempt at closure. During attempt at primary closure, the abdomen will be closed completely if the staff anesthesiologist and surgeon agree the belly is not too tight based on ventilatory parameters, vital signs and appearance. If either the surgeon or anesthesiologist should feel the closed abdomen is too tight, a ringed silo will be placed in the operating room, the same silo used in the bedside treatment arm, and the child will continue in the study. When a silo is placed either in the operating room due to inability to close the abdomen or at the bedside, they will be managed the same way. The skin will be dressed in the standard fashion (betadine jelly, xeroform and kerlix). The dressing allows visualization of the bowel. No reductions will be done the day of placement. After one night of observation a tie will be gently placed to apply downward pressure on the bowel. This pressure will not be allowed to increase the peak ventilator pressure by more than 2 cm H2O. One tie will be placed each subsequent day until the tie is within 2 cm of the skin at which point the patient will be scheduled for operative closure the day following the placement of the tie.
The medical management is controlled for resuscitation, sedation, ventilation and feeding between groups.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Active Comparator: 1 Operative attempt at closure |
Procedure: Operative attempt at closure
go the operating room to attempt closure
|
| Experimental: 2 bedside silo |
Procedure: Bedside Silo
silo placed at bedside on admission
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- this is a pilot study therefore there is no primary outcome variable [1 year]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Time to full feeds, time of ventilation, hospital charges, total time in the operating room, number of operations, fluid resuscitation, total transfusion volume, fluid re [1 year]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with gastroschisis
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Born prior to 34 weeks estimated gestational age
-
Another congenital anomaly influencing the respiratory status, gastrointestinal status, or the length of hospitalization and recovery.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Children's Mercy Hospital | Kansas City | Missouri | United States | 64108 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shawn D St. Peter, MD, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 06 09 141