Determination of Optimal Positive End-expiratory Pressure Using Electrical Impedance Tomography in Children Under General Anesthesia: Comparison Between Supine and Prone Positions

Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05275309
Collaborator
(none)
33
1
1
23.5
1.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to determine the appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in children under general anesthesia and to investigate whether there is a difference between the supine and supine positions.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Exploration of optimal PEEP in supine and prone position
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
33 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Determination of Optimal Positive End-expiratory Pressure Using Electrical Impedance Tomography in Children Under General Anesthesia: Comparison Between Supine and Prone Positions
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 14, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Children <= 6 years old

Pediatric patients under 6 years of age scheduled for surgery in the prone position

Other: Exploration of optimal PEEP in supine and prone position
General anesthesia is done in routine manner A sensor for electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is applied around the patient's chest. In supine position, lung recruitment maneuver is done, followed by decremental PEEP trial. Based on EIT parameter, optimal PEEP which induces minimal overdistension and collapse of lungs is determined. One hour after prone position, optimal PEEP is determined again.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Optimal PEEP level at spine position [10 minutes after intubation (supine)]

    Optimal PEEP level (cmH2O) determination using electrical impedance tomography at supine position

  2. Optimal PEEP level at prone position [1 hour after prone positioning (prone)]

    Optimal PEEP level (cmH2O) determination using electrical impedance tomography at prone position

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Dynamic compliance measured using Electrical impedance tomography [until 1 hour after prone positioning]

    ventilation/pressure (ml/cmH2O)

  2. regional ventilation delay measured using Electrical impedance tomography [until 1 hour after prone positioning]

    ventilation time delay during one breath (no unit)

  3. pulmonary opening pressure measured using Electrical impedance tomography [until 1 hour after prone positioning]

    alveoli opening pressure (cmH2O)

  4. atelectasis/overdistension ratio measured using Electrical impedance tomography [until 1 hour after prone positioning]

    The degree comparing atelectasis and overdistension (no unit)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A to 6 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Children <=6 years of age who are scheduled for surgery in the prone position under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Respiratory distress, bronchopulmonary dysplasia

  • Pneumothorax

  • Increased intracranial pressure

  • History of airway surgery

  • Cervical or thoracic surgery

  • Pulmonary hypertension

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hee-Soo Kim Seoul Korea, Republic of 03080

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Seoul National University Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hee-Soo Kim, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Hee-Soo Kim, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05275309
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • H2111-072-1272
First Posted:
Mar 11, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Mar 11, 2022
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2021
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 11, 2022