Sequential EHR Based Interventions to Increase Genetic Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Predisposition
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The goal of this sequential study design is to increase genetic testing in those meeting national clinical guidelines. The main question it aims to answer is: which intervention is most effective in uptake of genetic testing for the target population? Participants will receive genetic testing and counseling that may initiate life-saving screenings.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Germline genetic testing is recommended by the National Cancer Center Network (NCCN) for individuals with a personal history of ovarian cancer, young-onset (<50 years) breast cancer, and a family history of ovarian cancer or male breast cancer, among others. Recent publications demonstrate that the uptake of genetic testing is under-utilized, overall, and rates are consistently lower in minority populations. EHR-based algorithms will be used to identify patients of two Penn Medicine Ob/Gyn practices for whom genetic testing is recommended based on NCCN guidelines and to test pragmatic methods using messages delivered to patients or clinicians to encourage testing. The ACC Electronic Phenotyping Core developed the algorithms based on cancer registry data along with family history fields and this study will develop and test messages directed at patients and clinicians to encourage testing. The aims are:
-
Identification of at-risk populations through electronic health record (EHR) searches followed by patient nudges (MPM and then Way To Health) to increase the uptake of genetic counseling referral and testing in patients at gynecology practices at Dickens Center and Penn Medicine Radnor.
-
In patients who have not responded to patient nudges (Aim 1), test a provider nudge to increase the uptake of genetic counseling referral and testing in gynecology practices at Dickens Center and Penn Medicine Radnor (Aim 2).
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Sequential Communications This sequential arm contains three types of communication to be employed following non-response to the previous type. The initial communication will be a direct message to the patient via the MyPennMedicine. The subsequent message will be sent as a text via the Way To Health app(lication). The final communication will be a nudge to the patient's physician which will send upon opening the patient's chart and will remain as a flag thereafter. |
Other: Sequential EHR Communications
The intervention includes 3 message types: an EHR message, followed by a text message, followed by physician nudge. Each subsequent type will be activated if the previous type does not yield a response.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of Genetic Counseling Appointments Completed Following MPM Delivery [Within six months of MPM delivery]
Scheduling and completion of genetic counseling appointments will be monitored through EHR. MPM stands for MyPennMedicine message which will be sent directly to the patient through the medical record.
- Number of Genetic Counseling Appointments Completed Following Provider Nudge [Within six months of provider nudge]
Scheduling and completion of genetic counseling appointments will be monitored through EHR. The provider nudge will be delivered as a Best Practice Alert (BPA) upon opening the patient's chart.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Open Rate of MPM [Within one month of receiving MPM]
The proportion of eligible participants who open the invitation to receive genetic counseling and testing compared to the total amount of eligible participants sent an MPM.
- Response Rate of Way To Health text [Within one month of receiving text]
The proportion of eligible participants who respond to a text message invitation to receive genetic counseling and testing compared to the total amount of eligible participants sent a Way To Health (WTH) text.
Other Outcome Measures
- Number of Signed Referrals [Within one month of receiving referral]
The total number of referrals signed by the patient's Ob/Gyn provider for genetic counseling and testing.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with serous ovarian cancer diagnosed more than two years prior to study contact
-
Patients with breast cancer diagnosed at <50 years of age more than two years prior to study contact
-
Patients with triple negative breast cancer diagnosed more than two years prior to study contact
-
Unaffected individuals reporting a family history of ovarian cancer
-
Unaffected individuals reporting a family history of male breast cancer
-
Unaffected individuals reporting a family history of breast cancer <50 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have previously received genetic counseling and/or testing
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19104 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP, Buys SS, Dickson P, Domchek SM, Elkhanany A, Friedman S, Goggins M, Hutton ML; CGC; Karlan BY, Khan S, Klein C, Kohlmann W; CGC; Kurian AW, Laronga C, Litton JK, Mak JS; LCGC; Menendez CS, Merajver SD, Norquist BS, Offit K, Pederson HJ, Reiser G; CGC; Senter-Jamieson L; CGC; Shannon KM, Shatsky R, Visvanathan K, Weitzel JN, Wick MJ, Wisinski KB, Yurgelun MB, Darlow SD, Dwyer MA. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):77-102. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001.
- Domchek SM, Robson ME. Update on Genetic Testing in Gynecologic Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 20;37(27):2501-2509. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00363. Epub 2019 Aug 12. No abstract available.
- Hamilton JG, Symecko H, Spielman K, Breen K, Mueller R, Catchings A, Trottier M, Salo-Mullen EE, Shah I, Arutyunova A, Batson M, Gebert R, Pundock S, Schofield E, Offit K, Stadler ZK, Cadoo K, Carlo MI, Narayan V, Reiss KA, Robson ME, Domchek SM. Uptake and acceptability of a mainstreaming model of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. Genet Med. 2021 Nov;23(11):2105-2113. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01262-2. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
- Jatoi I, Sung H, Jemal A. The Emergence of the Racial Disparity in U.S. Breast-Cancer Mortality. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 23;386(25):2349-2352. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2200244. Epub 2022 Jun 18. No abstract available.
- Kukafka R, Pan S, Silverman T, Zhang T, Chung WK, Terry MB, Fleck E, Younge RG, Trivedi MS, McGuinness JE, He T, Dimond J, Crew KD. Patient and Clinician Decision Support to Increase Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222092. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22092.
- Kurian AW, Ward KC, Howlader N, Deapen D, Hamilton AS, Mariotto A, Miller D, Penberthy LS, Katz SJ. Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 20;37(15):1305-1315. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01854. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
- Lau-Min KS, Guerra CE, Nathanson KL, Bekelman JE. From Race-Based to Precision Oncology: Leveraging Behavioral Economics and the Electronic Health Record to Advance Health Equity in Cancer Care. JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Feb 17;5:PO.20.00418. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00418. eCollection 2021. No abstract available.
- McBride CM, Pathak S, Johnson CE, Alberg AJ, Bandera EV, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Bondy ML, Cote ML, Moorman PG, Peres LC, Peters ES, Schwartz AG, Terry PD, Schildkraut JM. Psychosocial factors associated with genetic testing status among African American women with ovarian cancer: Results from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study. Cancer. 2022 Mar 15;128(6):1252-1259. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34053. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
- Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Singh N, Ryan A, Karpinskyj C, Carlino G, Taylor J, Massingham SK, Raikou M, Kalsi JK, Woolas R, Manchanda R, Arora R, Casey L, Dawnay A, Dobbs S, Leeson S, Mould T, Seif MW, Sharma A, Williamson K, Liu Y, Fallowfield L, McGuire AJ, Campbell S, Skates SJ, Jacobs IJ, Parmar M. Ovarian cancer population screening and mortality after long-term follow-up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2182-2193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00731-5. Epub 2021 May 12.
- Reid S, Cadiz S, Pal T. Disparities in Genetic Testing and Care among Black women with Hereditary Breast Cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2020 Sep;12(3):125-131. doi: 10.1007/s12609-020-00364-1. Epub 2020 May 19.
- Smith-Uffen M, Bartley N, Davies G, Best M. Motivations and barriers to pursue cancer genomic testing: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jun;104(6):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.024. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
- Srivastava SK, Ahmad A, Miree O, Patel GK, Singh S, Rocconi RP, Singh AP. Racial health disparities in ovarian cancer: not just black and white. J Ovarian Res. 2017 Sep 21;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0355-y.
- 25922
- 851980