Coronally Advanced Flap With Two Different Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions

Sponsor
Paulista University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02229669
Collaborator
(none)
10
2
28

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study compared the clinical outcomes of coronally advanced flap using two different surgical strategies in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Horizontal incisions
  • Procedure: Oblique incisions
N/A

Detailed Description

The objective of this split-mouth, randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical outcomes of coronally advanced flap (CAF) using two different surgical strategies in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. Recessions were randomly treated according to a split-mouth design by means of: CAF with oblique interdental incisions (OBL technique) or CAF with horizontal interdental incisions (HOR technique). Marginal gingival recession (REC), clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket probing depth (PPD), height of keratinized tissue (HKT) and thickness of keratinized tissue (TKT) were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Patient-centered outcomes concerning morbidity and improvement in the esthetic appearance were recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Coronally Advanced Flap With Two Different Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions: A Split-mouth RCT
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Horizontal incisions

Coronally advanced flap was performed by using horizontal interdental incisions. An initial horizontal incision was made slightly coronal to the CEJ from the distal to the mesial papilla of the teeth with the recessions. A second incision, 1 to 2 mm apart and parallel to the first incision, was made apically. A sulcular incision was made to link the second incisions and the blade was inserted extending beyond the mucogingival junction, to create a uniform split-thickness flap. The tissue between the two incisions was partially removed to obtain a uniform receptor site that permitted primary closure. Approximation sutures to place the edge of the flap at the base of the remaining papilla were performed.

Procedure: Horizontal incisions
Performed by using horizontal interdental incisions. An initial horizontal incision was made slightly coronal to the CEJ from the distal to the mesial papilla of the teeth with the recessions. A second incision, 1 to 2 mm apart and parallel to the first incision, was made apically. A sulcular incision was made to link the second incisions and the blade was inserted (2 to 3 mm) extending beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ), to create a uniform split-thickness flap. The tissue between the two incisions was partially removed to obtain a uniform receptor site that permitted primary closure. Approximation sutures to place the edge of the flap at the base of the remaining papilla were performed. Passive closure of the wound margins without tension was achieved with interrupted coaptation.

Procedure: Oblique incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using oblique incisions in interdental areas, according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli & De Sanctis (2000). Oblique submarginal interdental incisions were performed and continued with the intrasulcular incisions at the recession defects, resulting in a envelop flap that was raised with a split-full-split approach in the coronal-apical direction. During coronal advancement, each surgical papilla was dislocated with respect to the de-epithelized anatomic papilla by the oblique incisions. Interrupted sutures were performed to stabilize single surgical papilla over the interdental connective tissue bed.

Experimental: Oblique incisions

Coronally advanced flap was performed by using oblique incisions in interdental areas, according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli & De Sanctis (2000). Oblique submarginal interdental incisions were performed and continued with the intrasulcular incisions at the recession defects, resulting in a envelop flap that was raised with a split-full-split approach in the coronal-apical direction. During coronal advancement, each surgical papilla was dislocated with respect to the de-epithelized anatomic papilla by the oblique incisions. Interrupted sutures were performed to stabilize single surgical papilla over the interdental connective tissue bed.

Procedure: Horizontal incisions
Performed by using horizontal interdental incisions. An initial horizontal incision was made slightly coronal to the CEJ from the distal to the mesial papilla of the teeth with the recessions. A second incision, 1 to 2 mm apart and parallel to the first incision, was made apically. A sulcular incision was made to link the second incisions and the blade was inserted (2 to 3 mm) extending beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ), to create a uniform split-thickness flap. The tissue between the two incisions was partially removed to obtain a uniform receptor site that permitted primary closure. Approximation sutures to place the edge of the flap at the base of the remaining papilla were performed. Passive closure of the wound margins without tension was achieved with interrupted coaptation.

Procedure: Oblique incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using oblique incisions in interdental areas, according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli & De Sanctis (2000). Oblique submarginal interdental incisions were performed and continued with the intrasulcular incisions at the recession defects, resulting in a envelop flap that was raised with a split-full-split approach in the coronal-apical direction. During coronal advancement, each surgical papilla was dislocated with respect to the de-epithelized anatomic papilla by the oblique incisions. Interrupted sutures were performed to stabilize single surgical papilla over the interdental connective tissue bed.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change from baseline in Marginal gingival recession to 6 months [baseline, and at 3 and 6 months post-surgery]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. height of keratinized tissue [Baseline, 3 and 6 months]

  2. thickness of keratinized tissue [baseline, 3 and 6 months]

  3. Clinical attachment level [baseline, 3 and 6 months]

  4. Probing deph [baseline, 3 and 6 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Systemically healthy subjects

  • Patients should have bilateral Class I and II MGRs (Miller 1985) in maxillary tooth (at least three recession-type defects affecting adjacent teeth in each side of the maxilla).

  • At least 20 teeth and no sites with attachment loss and probing pocket depth (PPD) > 3 mm.

  • Full-mouth plaque and bleeding on probing of < 20%.

  • Involved tooth should present tooth vitality, absence of caries, restorations or extensive non-carious cervical lesion.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • History of smoking.

  • Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory therapies in the previous 2 months.

  • Previous mucogingival surgery at the region to be treated

  • Systemic conditions that could affect tissue healing (e.g. diabetes).

  • Use of orthodontic appliances.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Paulista University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Suzana Pimentel, PHD, Paulista University
  • Study Chair: Guilherme Barrella, MS, Paulista University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Guilherme Barrella, MS, DDS, Paulista University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02229669
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • U1111-1158-9611
First Posted:
Sep 1, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Sep 1, 2014
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2014
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 1, 2014