RCT: The Effectiveness of Brushing and Flossing Sequence on Control of Plaque and Gingival Inflammation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the effectiveness of brushing and flossing sequence in the control of dental plaque and gingival inflammation.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Periodontal disease is the disease of the supporting dental tissues like alveolar bone,periodontal ligament cementum and gingiva. The most common form is plaque-induced gingivitis . Bleeding on gingival probing is one of the hallmarks of gingival inflammation.The removal of dental plaque is the most crucial action for preventing and treating gingival inflammation. Toothbrush along with toothpaste are still the most reliable means of plaque control. However, cleaning should be thorough and performed at regular intervals.
Toothbrush has a limited ability to reach all the areas around the tooth. Inter-dental areas are prone for plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation. Dental floss is one of the most effective tool in addition to tooth brush to remove inter-dental plaque. The sequence of using toothbrush and dental floss may influence the removal of dental plaque and consequently reducing the bleeding on probing of gingiva. There is conflicting evidence in the literature. The hypothesis of this study is that the sequence of brushing and flossing will not influence control of plaque control and gingival inflammation.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Brushing First and Flossing Later (BF) The participants in BF group were asked to use modified bass method of tooth brushing first using Colgate® tooth brush (the amount of Colgate® tooth paste used is half-length of the toothbrush's head) and then floss with Colgate® dental floss using Spool method for a 2-week period. This is followed by a one week wash out period wherein they will practice oral hygiene according to their habitual method. After this cross over is done in which participants will change the sequence to FB wherein they will floss first and brush later. |
Other: Brushing first and Flossing later (BF)
Participants will follow Brushing first and flossing later (BF) sequence for 2 weeks, and after 1 week wash out period, Flossing first and Brushing later (FB) sequence for another 2 weeks.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Flossing First and Brushing Later (FB) The participants in FB group were asked to floss first with Colgate® dental floss using Spool method and then modified bass method of tooth brushing first using Colgate® tooth brush (the amount of Colgate® tooth paste used is half-length of the toothbrush's head) for a 2-week period. This is followed by a one week wash out period wherein they will practice oral hygiene according to their habitual method. After this cross over is done in which participants will change the sequence to BF wherein they will brush first and floss later. |
Other: Flossing first and Brushing later (FB)
Participants will follow Flossing first and Brushing later (FB) sequence for 2 weeks, and after 1 week wash out period, Brushing first and flossing later (BF) sequence for another 2 weeks.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline in Mean BPI Index Scores at 2 Weeks [Baseline and 2 weeks]
Bleeding on probing (BOP) is an objective indicator of inflammation. BPI (Bleeding Point Index) is a validated index used to measure BOP. BOP is determined at the buccal, lingual and proximal surfaces of all teeth using BPI scores. BPI scores are measured at baseline and 2 weeks, followed by a wash out period of one week. BPI score is measured again at baseline and 2 weeks after cross over in intervention. Change in BPI scores will give the estimation of effect of the intervention. BPI score- minimum value is 0% and Maximum is 100% of bleeding surfaces in each individual patient with teeth. A positive error means that the predicted value is larger than the true value, and a negative error means that the predicted value is less than the true value. The mean error should be close to zero. Sometimes it will be negative or positive depending on the population.. Higher mean score is poor outcome. However, higher reduction in mean score compared to baseline is better outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change From Baseline in Mean RMNPI Index Score at 2 Weeks [Baseline and 2 weeks]
Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index(RMNPI) is a self validated tool to assess dental plaque accumulation on the teeth surfaces. RMNPI scores are used to assess change in plaque scores at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks .This will be followed by a 1 week wash out period. Then there is a cross over in the intervention. RMNPI scores are measured again from Baseline and 2 weeks. Maximum number of surfaces examined are 504 per person. A Minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 1 can be calculated in each patient. Higher mean score is a worse outcome. However,higher percent reduction in mean score when compared to baseline is better outcome.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
• Dental students of Dental school of Melaka-Manipal Medical College
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Participants who had systemic diseases
-
Gingivitis or periodontitis
-
Use of antibiotics in the past 3 months,
-
Pregnancy,
-
Smoking
-
Orthodontic appliances.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Faculty of Dentistry, Melaka-Manipal Medical College | Melaka Tengah | Melaka | Malaysia | 57150 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Melaka Manipal Medical College
- Colgate Palmolive
Investigators
- Study Director: Abdul Rashid Ismail, BDS, Melaka Manipal Medical College
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- Jayakumar A, Padmini H, Haritha A, Reddy KP. Role of dentifrice in plaque removal: a clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Apr-Jun;21(2):213-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.66629.
- Mazhari F, Boskabady M, Moeintaghavi A, Habibi A. The effect of toothbrushing and flossing sequence on interdental plaque reduction and fluoride retention: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2018 Jul;89(7):824-832. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0149. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
- Torkzaban P, Arabi SR, Sabounchi SS, Roshanaei G. The Efficacy of Brushing and Flossing Sequence on Control of Plaque and Gingival Inflammation. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2015;13(3):267-73. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a32678.
- Valkenburg C, Slot DE, Bakker EW, Van der Weijden FA. Does dentifrice use help to remove plaque? A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Dec;43(12):1050-1058. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12615. Epub 2016 Oct 3. Review.
- Zanatta FB, Antoniazzi RP, Pinto TM, Rösing CK. Supragingival plaque removal with and without dentifrice: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(3):235-40.
- MMMC/FOD/AR/B6
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | 221 students were screened for eligibility between January 25, 2019 to May 10, 2019 in the Out-Patient Department (OPD) of Dept.of Periodontics, Poly clinic A, Klinik Pergigian, Melaka, Malaysia. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 30 of 221 participants were randomized. Of those not randomized, 120 did not meet inclusion criteria and 71 declined to participate. |
Arm/Group Title | Brushing Flossing (BF) | Flossing Brushing (FB) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants used Brushing first and Flossing (BF) sequence in the study. After 1 week wash out period they used Flossing first and brushing (FB) later sequence. Toothbrush used was Colgate® tooth brush- Soft bristled, waxed dental floss (Colgate® dental floss) and toothpaste (Colgate® tooth paste) were standardized. The method of brushing used was Modified Bass Method, the amount of dentifrice used is half-length of the toothbrush's head and Spool method of flossing was used. | Participants used Flossing first and brush (FB) later sequence in the study. After 1 week wash out period they used Brushing first and flossing (FB) later sequence. Toothbrush used was Colgate® tooth brush- Soft bristled, waxed dental floss (Colgate® dental floss) and toothpaste (Colgate® tooth paste) were standardized. The method of brushing used was Modified Bass Method, the amount of dentifrice used is half-length of the toothbrush's head and Spool method of flossing was used. |
Period Title: First Intervention (2 Weeks) | ||
STARTED | 15 | 15 |
COMPLETED | 15 | 15 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: First Intervention (2 Weeks) | ||
STARTED | 15 | 15 |
COMPLETED | 15 | 15 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: First Intervention (2 Weeks) | ||
STARTED | 15 | 15 |
COMPLETED | 15 | 15 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Brushing Flossing (BF) First | Flossing Brushing (FB) First | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants used Brushing first and Flossing later (BF) sequence for 2 weeks. After a washout period of 1 week they used flossing first and brushing later (FB) sequence Toothbrush used was Colgate® tooth brush- Soft bristled, waxed dental floss (Colgate® dental floss) and toothpaste (Colgate® tooth paste) were standardized. The method of brushing used was Modified Bass Method, the amount of dentifrice used is half-length of the toothbrush's head. The method of flossing used was Spool method of flossing. | Participants used Flossing first and Brushing later (FB) sequence for a period of 2 weeks. After a washout period of 1 week they used Brushing first and flossing later (BF) sequence Toothbrush used was Colgate® tooth brush- Soft bristled, waxed dental floss (Colgate® dental floss) and toothpaste (Colgate® tooth paste) were standardized. The method of brushing used was Modified Bass Method, the amount of dentifrice used is half-length of the toothbrush's head and the method of flossing used was Spool method of flossing. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 15 | 15 | 30 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
22.87
(0.52)
|
23.00
(0.38)
|
22.93
(0.45)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
14
93.3%
|
12
80%
|
26
86.7%
|
Male |
1
6.7%
|
3
20%
|
4
13.3%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |||
Malaysian Malay |
6
40%
|
6
40%
|
12
40%
|
Malaysian Chinese |
3
20%
|
4
26.7%
|
7
23.3%
|
Malaysian Indians |
4
26.7%
|
3
20%
|
7
23.3%
|
others |
2
13.3%
|
2
13.3%
|
4
13.3%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
Malaysia |
15
100%
|
15
100%
|
30
100%
|
BPI scores (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
1.8840
(1.765)
|
2.5253
(2.388)
|
2.2047
(2.089)
|
RMNPI index scores (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
0.0866
(0.687)
|
0.025
(0.020)
|
0.080
(0.066)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change From Baseline in Mean BPI Index Scores at 2 Weeks |
---|---|
Description | Bleeding on probing (BOP) is an objective indicator of inflammation. BPI (Bleeding Point Index) is a validated index used to measure BOP. BOP is determined at the buccal, lingual and proximal surfaces of all teeth using BPI scores. BPI scores are measured at baseline and 2 weeks, followed by a wash out period of one week. BPI score is measured again at baseline and 2 weeks after cross over in intervention. Change in BPI scores will give the estimation of effect of the intervention. BPI score- minimum value is 0% and Maximum is 100% of bleeding surfaces in each individual patient with teeth. A positive error means that the predicted value is larger than the true value, and a negative error means that the predicted value is less than the true value. The mean error should be close to zero. Sometimes it will be negative or positive depending on the population.. Higher mean score is poor outcome. However, higher reduction in mean score compared to baseline is better outcome. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 2 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All participants who received at least one intervention each and completed all study visits were included in the effectiveness analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Brushing First and Flossing Later (BF) | Flossing First and Brushing Later (FB) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants who performed Brushing first and flossing later (BF) in either the first or last 2 weeks of the study | Participants who performed Flossing first and brushing later (FB) in either the first or last 2 weeks of the study. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Mean (Standard Error) [score on a scale] |
0.396
(0.410)
|
-1.028
(0.392)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Brushing First and Flossing Later (BF), Flossing First and Brushing Later (FB) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis is that the sequence of brushing first and flossing later has no effect on gingival inflammation. No previous studies with Mean and SD were available. Hence, a pilot study was done. 30 participants were randomly assigned to Brush first and floss later (BF) group ; and Floss first brush later(FB) group. After 1 week there was cross-over. 80% power is required to detect mean difference in BPI scores. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Equivalence | |
Comments | The two treatment sequence could be called equivalent if the observed difference and its 95% CI are completely inside the interval of clinical equivalence. A significant result (p < 0.05) means that the two treatments are equivalent, according the definition of equivalence as defined clinically. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.022 |
Comments | The threshold for statistical significance was p <0.05 | |
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | Three-way mixed ANOVA was done to determine the effect of Intervention on BPI scores . | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | 1.424 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.221 to 2.628 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Change From Baseline in Mean RMNPI Index Score at 2 Weeks |
---|---|
Description | Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index(RMNPI) is a self validated tool to assess dental plaque accumulation on the teeth surfaces. RMNPI scores are used to assess change in plaque scores at baseline and at the end of 2 weeks .This will be followed by a 1 week wash out period. Then there is a cross over in the intervention. RMNPI scores are measured again from Baseline and 2 weeks. Maximum number of surfaces examined are 504 per person. A Minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 1 can be calculated in each patient. Higher mean score is a worse outcome. However,higher percent reduction in mean score when compared to baseline is better outcome. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 2 weeks |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
All participants who received at least one intervention each and completed all study visits were included in the effectiveness analysis. |
Arm/Group Title | Brushing First and Flossing Later (BF) | Flossing First and Brushing Later (FB) |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants who performed Brushing First and Flossing Later(BF) in either the first or last 2 weeks of the study. | Participants who performed Flossing First and Brushing later (FB) in either the first or last 2 weeks of the study. |
Measure Participants | 30 | 30 |
Mean (Standard Error) [score on a scale] |
0.042
(1.043)
|
0.101
(1.427)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Brushing First and Flossing Later (BF), Flossing First and Brushing Later (FB) |
---|---|---|
Comments | Null hypothesis: The sequence of brushing and flossing has no effect on plaque scores There were no previous studies with Mean and SD to calculate sample. So a pilot study was conducted. 30 participants were randomly assigned in 1:1 fashion to Brush-floss (GroupA) and Floss brush group (group B). Then after 1 week there was cross-over among the groups.2 groups would have at least 80% power to detect the mean difference in BPI scores. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Equivalence | |
Comments | The two treatment sequence could be called equivalent if the observed difference and its 95% CI are completely inside the interval of clinical equivalence. A significant result (p < 0.05) means that the two treatments are equivalent, according the definition of equivalence as defined clinically. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.971 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | Three-way mixed ANOVA was done to determine the effect of Intervention on RMNPI index scores | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | -0.058 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -3.335 to 3.219 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Baseline, 24 hours, 2 weeks, 5 weeks | |
---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | We followed the description provided by clinical trials. gov. Adverse event and serious adverse event was recorded in our data collection sheet for each participant. Checklist was prepared for each participant and attached to the data form. The data was recorded at baseline examination carried out in the morning clinical session, the participants were reviewed after 24 hours, 2 weeks and 5 weeks. They were asked to report immediately if any adverse events occurred in other periods of time. | |
Arm/Group Title | Brushing and Flossing | |
Arm/Group Description | No adverse events were reported | |
All Cause Mortality |
||
Brushing and Flossing | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/30 (0%) | |
Serious Adverse Events |
||
Brushing and Flossing | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/30 (0%) | |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||
Brushing and Flossing | ||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/30 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Rajesh Hosadurga |
---|---|
Organization | Melaka-Manipal Medical College |
Phone | +6062896662 ext 3823 |
rajesh.hosadurga@manipal.edu.my |
- MMMC/FOD/AR/B6