Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design

Sponsor
University of Padova, School of Dental Medicine (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02276586
Collaborator
(none)
58
1
2
20
2.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Background: The actual literature is consistent in considering potential negative effects of sub-gingival prosthetic margins on the periodontal health, but no research has focused the attention on the type of prosthetic margin designs. Hence, the aim of the present study is to evaluate if a horizontal finishing line (deep chamfer preparation) may have a different influence on periodontal soft tissue in comparison with a vertical finishing line (feather edge preparation).

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled double blind clinical trial with one single operator and three experienced examiners was performed. One hundred and six crowns were prepared with horizontal tooth preparation while ninety-four with vertical tooth preparation. All the margins were positioned within the periodontal sulcus, at 0.5mm sub-gingivally and all the all-ceramic restorations were cemented with resin cement. Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD), Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI) and Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) were recorded prior to tooth preparation and twelve month after crown cementation. Also, at 12 months follow-up, the gingival margin position was related to the crown margin position.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Horizontal Tooth preparation
  • Procedure: Vertical Tooth preparation
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
58 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1

Horizontal Tooth preparation

Procedure: Horizontal Tooth preparation
Round parallel chamfer diamond burs were used for teeth preparation; coarse first (151 micron) and extra-fine after (25 micron)

Experimental: Group 2

Vertical tooth preparation

Procedure: Vertical Tooth preparation
Long flame diamond burs were used for teeth preparation; coarse first (151 micron) and extra-fine after (25 micron)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Plaque Index (PI) [Change from Baseline Plaque Index at 12 months post intervention]

    Plaque Index (PI), according to Silness & Loe

  2. Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD) [Change from Baseline Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD) at 12 months post intervention]

    Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD) measured at three different facial sites (mesial, facial, distal), with the utilization of a periodontal probe (UNC periodontal probe, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL) recording the measurements to the nearest millimeter.

  3. Gingival Index (GI) [Change from Baseline Gingival Index (GI) at 12 months post intervention]

    Gingival Index (GI), according to Silness & Loe

  4. Bleeding on Probing (BOP) [Change from Baseline Bleeding on Probing (BOP) at 12 months post intervention]

    Bleeding on Probing (BOP), according to Ainamo & Bay (presence or absence)

  5. Gingival recession (GR) [Change from Baseline Gingival recession (GR) at 12 months post intervention]

    Gingival margin position related to the crown margin

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
The patient inclusion criteria were as follows:
  1. dentate patients treatment planned for single unit restorations in the esthetic zone (from 1st premolar forward)

  2. periodontal probing depth prior to tooth preparation ≤4mm, with no bleeding on probing and no plaque

  3. 30 years of age

  4. full mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full mouth bleeding scores (FMBS) <20% at study baseline

  5. eventual loss of attachment limited only to areas different from the sites included in the study.

The patient exclusion criteria were as follows:
  1. patient with medical history in which any dental intervention would be contraindicated

  2. any local or systemic disease, condition or medication that might compromise healing and affect the periodontium

  3. dental caries or periodontal disease in the remaining teeth

  4. inability or unwillingness to return for follow-up visit.

Exlusion Criteria:
  1. patients with systemic diseases (such as heart, coagulation, and leukocyte diseases or metabolic disorders)

  2. history of radiation therapy in the head and neck region within 12 months prior to surgical phase

  3. current treatment with steroids

  4. neurological or psychiatric condition that could interfere with good oral hygiene

  5. immunocompromised status, including infection with human immunodeficiency virus

  6. smoking habit (more than 10 cigarettes/day)

  7. drug or alcohol abuse

  8. inadequate compliance

  9. patients who received bone regeneration procedure

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Padova Padova PD Italy 35122

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Padova, School of Dental Medicine

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Eriberto Bressan, Chairman, Department of Periodontology, University of Padova, School of Dental Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02276586
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2737P
First Posted:
Oct 28, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Oct 28, 2014
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2014
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 28, 2014