Clinical and Histomorphometric Analysis of Collagen Matrix Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Mucogingival Surgery in Orthodontic Patients
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
There are some orthodontics treatments that perform risk movements ,and a bone dehiscence may be expected. In that cases mucogingival surgery , such as connective tissue grafts, is necessary prior to tooth movement.
The connective tissue graft in combination with coronal advanced flap is still considered the gold standard , although the use of porcine collagen matrix has obtained promising results for treatment of Miller class I and II recession defects.
Most of the studies report clinical results after a connective tissue graft and there is no evidence about the type of attachment obtained after the graft is performed, a few articles have shown histological results. But, as a rule , a histological study is only performed under exceptional circumstances such as a dental fracture, untreatable decay, tooth extraction for orthodontic reasons, or other reasons.
Most of the techniques results in the formation of a long junctional epithelium and connective tissue attachment with fibers parallel to the root surface. Animals studies have shown a shorter epithelium and a larger new cementum formation after the use of the collagen matrix.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to confirm that periodontal regeneration happens after mucogingival surgery The principal outcome is compare the millimeters of new attachment create after a connective tissue graft and after the use of a porcine collagen matrix in teeth that have to been extracted (because of the orthodontic planing treatment) after mucogingival surgery .
The secondary outcomes are:
-
length of new cementum (histometry results)
-
length of the junctional epithelium (histometry results)
-
length of connective tissue attachment (histometry results)
-
complete root coverage (clinical results)
-
width of keratinized tissue
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Autologous connective tissue graft Soft tissue harvesting from patient palate |
Other: autologous connective tissue graft
Soft tissue harvesting from patient palate with coronal advanced flap
|
Experimental: collagen matrix Mucograft collagen matrix manufactured by Geistlich AG, Switzerland Device: Collagen matrix |
Device: Collagen matrix
Mucograft collagen matrix combined with coronal advanced flap
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- millimeters of new attachment [Change from baseline at following surgery sixth month]
histometry assessment
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Length of new cementum [Change from baseline at following surgery sixth month]
histometry assessment
- Length of new junctional epithelium [Change from baseline at following surgery sixth month]
histometry assessment
- length of connective attachment [Change from baseline at following surgery sixth month]
histometry assessment
- complete root coverage [Change from baseline at following surgery sixth month]
clinical assessment
- width of keratinized tissue [Change from baseline at following surgery sixth month]
clinical assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patient in orthodontic treatment ,who needs mucogingival surgery in both hemi arcade and later the tooth adjacent to the graft should be extracted because of the orthodontic planing treatment .
-
The patient must be 18 years or older
-
Patient shows sufficient plaque control (FMPS < 20%).
-
The patient is able to fully understand the nature of the proposed surgery and is able to provide a signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
General contraindications for dental and/or surgical treatment are present.
-
The patient is taking medications or having treatments which have an effect on mucosal healing in general (e.g. steroids, large doses of anti-inflammatory drugs).
-
Untreated periodontal conditions
-
Patients not willing to participate
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Department fo Stomatology II, Faculty of Medicine and Nursery, University of the Basque Country | Leioa | Biscay | Spain | 48940 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Elena Ruiz de Gopegui Palacios
Investigators
- Study Director: Luis Antonio Aguirre Zorzano, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
- Principal Investigator: Elena Ruiz de Gopegui, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
- Principal Investigator: Ana Maria Garcia de la Fuente, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
- Study Chair: Ruth Estefania Fresco, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
- Study Chair: Xavier Marichalar Mendia, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
- Study Chair: Jose Manuel Aguirre Urizar, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Aroca S, Molnár B, Windisch P, Gera I, Salvi GE, Nikolidakis D, Sculean A. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jul;40(7):713-20. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12112. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
- Atieh MA, Alsabeeha N, Tawse-Smith A, Payne AG. Xenogeneic collagen matrix for periodontal plastic surgery procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Res. 2016 Aug;51(4):438-52. doi: 10.1111/jre.12333. Epub 2015 Nov 7. Review.
- Batenhorst KF, Bowers GM, Williams JE Jr. Tissue changes resulting from facial tipping and extrusion of incisors in monkeys. J Periodontol. 1974 Sep;45(9):660-8.
- Buti J, Baccini M, Nieri M, La Marca M, Pini-Prato GP. Bayesian network meta-analysis of root coverage procedures: ranking efficacy and identification of best treatment. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Apr;40(4):372-86. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12028. Epub 2013 Jan 24. Review.
- Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):136-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01267.x. Review.
- Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L. Coronally advanced flap with and without a xenogenic collagen matrix in the treatment of multiple recessions: a randomized controlled clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34 Suppl 3:s97-102. doi: 10.11607/prd.1605.
- Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2012 Mar;83(3):321-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110215. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
- Chambrone L, Chambrone D, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects? J Dent. 2008 Sep;36(9):659-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jun 26. Review.
- Griffin TJ, Cheung WS, Zavras AI, Damoulis PD. Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 2006 Dec;77(12):2070-9.
- Jepsen K, Jepsen S, Zucchelli G, Stefanini M, de Sanctis M, Baldini N, Greven B, Heinz B, Wennström J, Cassel B, Vignoletti F, Sanz M. Treatment of gingival recession defects with a coronally advanced flap and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):82-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12019. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
- McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Long-Term Results Comparing Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts With Coronally Advanced Flaps for Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Recession Defects. J Periodontol. 2016 Mar;87(3):221-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150386. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
- Molnár B, Aroca S, Keglevich T, Gera I, Windisch P, Stavropoulos A, Sculean A. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller Class I and II gingival recessions with collagen matrix and the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique. Quintessence Int. 2013 Jan;44(1):17-24. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a28739.
- Soileau KM, Brannon RB. A histologic evaluation of various stages of palatal healing following subepithelial connective tissue grafting procedures: a comparison of eight cases. J Periodontol. 2006 Jul;77(7):1267-73.
- Steiner GG, Pearson JK, Ainamo J. Changes of the marginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. J Periodontol. 1981 Jun;52(6):314-20.
- Thoma DS, Benić GI, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Jung RE. A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:146-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01784.x. Review.
- Thoma DS, Mühlemann S, Jung RE. Critical soft-tissue dimensions with dental implants and treatment concepts. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):106-18. doi: 10.1111/prd.12045. Review.
- Wennström JL, Lindhe J, Sinclair F, Thilander B. Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol. 1987 Mar;14(3):121-9.
- Wessel JR, Tatakis DN. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):425-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070325 .
- MCP-2