To Measure Pain Perception Following De-Epithelized Free Gingival Graft Harvesting

Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03895476
Collaborator
(none)
72
1
4
37.7
1.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This randomized clinical comparative study will evaluate the postoperative pain following the FGG graft harvest procedure technique covered by four different methods for coverage of the palatal donor site.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: palatal wound will not cover
  • Diagnostic Test: palatal wound covered with platelet rich fibrin
  • Diagnostic Test: palatal wound covered with a collagen sponge and cyanoacrylate
  • Diagnostic Test: palatal wound covered with a stent
N/A

Detailed Description

This study will compare the application of :
  • hemostatic collagen sponge

  • collagen sponge sealed with abio-adhesive material

  • Platelet rich fibrin

  • physical barrier (stent) on the palatal donor sites with the purpose of which one of these will result in least postoperative pain after epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
72 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Measure Pain Perception Following De-Epithelized Free Gingival Graft Harvesting
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 8, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 30, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: control group

palatal wound will not be protected with any material

Diagnostic Test: palatal wound will not cover
after harvesting the graft from the palate the wound will be left uncovered with secondary healing intention

Active Comparator: group 1

palatal wound will be protected with Platelet rich Fibrin

Diagnostic Test: palatal wound covered with platelet rich fibrin
after harvesting the graft from the palate the platelet rich fibrin will be sutured to covered the harvested site

Active Comparator: group 2

wound will consist of collagen protection with the additional layer of cyanoacrylate surgical glue.

Diagnostic Test: palatal wound covered with a collagen sponge and cyanoacrylate
after harvesting the graft from the palate a collagen sponge will be sealed with cyanoacrylate in position

Active Comparator: group 3

wound will consist of collagen protection with the application

Diagnostic Test: palatal wound covered with a stent
after harvesting the graft from the palate a stent that will be prepared for the patient, will be placed on to cover the wound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain assessment [day 1 to day 14]

    To assessed the pain outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS) from 0=No pain to 10=worst, excrutiating pain

  2. Bleeding assessment [day 1 to day 14]

    To assessed the bleeding outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS) from 0=No bruising/bleeding to 10=severe bruising/bleeding

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Activity Tolerance [day 1 to days 14]

    To assessed the effects on daily activities using the VAS scale from 0=No Limitation to 10= Bedrest required

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • English speaking

  • At least 18 years old- 70 years old

  • Must be a patient of the UAB Dental School

  • Able to read and understand informed consent document

  • Patients needing soft tissue graft with teeth that have miller class I or II recession (>=2mm) on the facial aspects

  • Presence of periodontally healthy teeth at the recipient site.

  • Ability of the participants to maintain good oral hygiene

  • Patient not pregnant or breastfeeding

  • Not taking medications known to cause gingival enlargement

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Non-English speaking

  • Less than 18 years old, older than 70 years old

  • Smokers/tobacco users

  • Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing

  • Patients that have severe gingival recession (Miller class III and IV) or < 2 mm.

  • Presence of periodontal disease at the recipient site.

  • Poor oral hygiene

  • Patient pregnant or breastfeeding

  • Taking medications known to cause gingival enlargement

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Unversity of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Dentistry Birmingham Alabama United States 35294-0007

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Hussein Basma, Principal Investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03895476
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • IRB-300002777
First Posted:
Mar 29, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Aug 25, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 25, 2022