The Effect of Scheduled Ripcord Removal on the Outcomes of Baerveldt 350 Implants

Sponsor
Duke University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01915706
Collaborator
(none)
81
1
2
48.6
1.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the post-operative complication rates and surgical outcomes in patients with a Baerveldt 350 implant following scheduled rip-cord removal in clinic at post-operative week 3 versus spontaneous tube opening. Patients age 18 or greater with uncontrolled glaucoma and scheduled to undergo their first superotemporal Baerveldt 350 implant will be recruited and randomized at the time of enrollment to either scheduled ripcord removal at post-operative week 3 or no ripcord removal. Incidence of complications will be documented and compared between the 2 groups. The final intraocular pressure control between the 2 groups will also be compared in a secondary outcome analysis. This study will help to establish post-operative management guidelines to minimize complications and improve intraocular pressure lowering success following Baerveldt 350 implantation.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Ripcord removal
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
81 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
The Effect of Scheduled Ripcord Removal on the Outcomes of Baerveldt 350 Implants
Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 19, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 19, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Observation

Patients randomized to observation will be observed during the post-operative period for spontaneous Baerveldt-350 tube opening. The ripcord will not be removed unless deemed medically necessary by the study physician.

Experimental: Ripcord removal

Patients randomized to intervention will have their ripcords removed in clinic at post-operative week 3.

Procedure: Ripcord removal
Patients randomized to intervention will have their ripcords removed in clinic at post-operative week 3. Ripcord removal will be performed by study PI at the slit lamp with standard of care sterile technique and topical/local anesthesia. Patients will be monitored 30 minutes following ripcord removal for intraocular pressure as well as complications.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence of post-operative complications [Up to 6 months]

    Incidence of complications (including but not limited to shallowing of the anterior chamber, hypotony, choroidal effusion and choroidal hemorrhage) will be documented and compared between the 2 groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Incidence of successful intraocular pressure control [Post-operative month 6]

    Final intraocular pressure at post-operative month 6 will be assessed and incidence of successful intraocular pressure control will be compared. Successful intraocular pressure control is defined as unqualified when the intraocular pressure is between 6 and 18 mmHg or a 25% reduction from the pre-surgical intraocular pressure without medication and qualified when pressure-lowering therapies are required to maintain intraocular pressure at that level.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Men or women aged 18 years and older at screening. There is no upper age limit.

  • Inadequately controlled glaucoma refractory to maximum therapy

  • Suitable candidate for Baerveldt-350 implant in the superotemporal quadrant in the study eye, which the physician deems as medically necessary.

  • Capable and willing to provide consent

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Unable or unwilling to provide consent

  • Any previous ocular surgery other than cataract extraction or trabeculectomy

  • Any previous ocular surgeries in the study eye preventing placement of the Baerveldt-350 implant in the superotemporal quadrant

  • Any abnormality other than glaucoma in the study eye that could affect tonometry.

  • Presence or history of any abnormality or disorder that could interfere with the study procedure or prevent the successful completion of the study.

  • Monocularity (where best corrected visual acuity in the non-operative eye is worse than 20/200)

  • Any significant unstable cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic, hematologic, neurologic, or psychiatric disease.

  • Known pregnant or breastfeeding women

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Duke Eye Center Durham North Carolina United States 27710

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Duke University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leon Herndon, M.D., Duke University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Duke University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01915706
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Pro00047845
First Posted:
Aug 5, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Mar 1, 2018
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2018
Keywords provided by Duke University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 1, 2018