A Comparison of FDG-PET Versus MRI Based Target Volume Delineation in Glioblastoma and the Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Alteration of MRI Based Target Volumes.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
HYPOTHESIS AND SAMPLE SIZE The tumor delineated by FDG-PET is significantly different from the delineation achieved by MR T1 contrast weighted images in glioblastoma; expecting a standard error of 12.5 % (a confidence interval of 25%), with a confidence level set at 95%, a sample size of 15 patients would be accrued in the study.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: FDG-PET A comparison of FDG-PET versus MRI based target volume delineation in glioblastoma and the role of FDG-PET/CT in the alteration of MRI based target volumes. |
Procedure: FDG-PET
Fluoro-deoxy gluocose-Positron emission tomography for delineating volumes in Glioblastoma
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Tumor infiltration defined on FDG-PET not determined to MRI [18 months]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Post operative patients of documented high grade gliomas (grade III and IV)
-
Patients who have not undergone any previous irradiation to brain.
-
Performance Scale as defined by ECOG PS 0-3
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients who are diabetic.
-
Patients who are pregnant.
-
Any documented contrast allergy to the agents used for imaging.
-
Patients who are unable to comprehend or cooperate effectively for treatment planning.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Medanta Institute of Clinical Research
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- AHD1234