A Comparison of FDG-PET Versus MRI Based Target Volume Delineation in Glioblastoma and the Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Alteration of MRI Based Target Volumes.

Sponsor
Medanta Institute of Clinical Research (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01083719
Collaborator
(none)
15
1
16

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

HYPOTHESIS AND SAMPLE SIZE The tumor delineated by FDG-PET is significantly different from the delineation achieved by MR T1 contrast weighted images in glioblastoma; expecting a standard error of 12.5 % (a confidence interval of 25%), with a confidence level set at 95%, a sample size of 15 patients would be accrued in the study.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: FDG-PET
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
15 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Phase II Study Comparing FDG-PET Versus MRI Based Target Volume Delineation in Glioblastoma and the Role of FDG-PET/CT in the Alteration of MRI Based Target Volumes.
Study Start Date :
Apr 1, 2010
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2011
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: FDG-PET

A comparison of FDG-PET versus MRI based target volume delineation in glioblastoma and the role of FDG-PET/CT in the alteration of MRI based target volumes.

Procedure: FDG-PET
Fluoro-deoxy gluocose-Positron emission tomography for delineating volumes in Glioblastoma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Tumor infiltration defined on FDG-PET not determined to MRI [18 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Post operative patients of documented high grade gliomas (grade III and IV)

  2. Patients who have not undergone any previous irradiation to brain.

  3. Performance Scale as defined by ECOG PS 0-3

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Patients who are diabetic.

  2. Patients who are pregnant.

  3. Any documented contrast allergy to the agents used for imaging.

  4. Patients who are unable to comprehend or cooperate effectively for treatment planning.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medanta Institute of Clinical Research

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01083719
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • AHD1234
First Posted:
Mar 10, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Mar 10, 2010
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2010
Keywords provided by , ,
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 10, 2010