SONOFLUO: Intraoperative Sonographically Versus Fluorescence-guided Resection of Contrast-enhancing Gliomas and Brain Metastases

Sponsor
Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Care (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05475522
Collaborator
(none)
134
1
2
60
2.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Objective of the study is to determine whether intraoperative ultrasound guided resection of gliomas with contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging and brain metastases can achieve as high rate of gross total resection as fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Ultrasound guided brain tumor resection
  • Device: 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence-guided brain tumor resection
N/A

Detailed Description

Fluorescence with 5-aminolevulinic acid, fluorescein and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most common modalities used to intraoperatively rate extent of brain tumor resection. Intraoperative sonography is another promising method of intraoperative visualization. It's advantages include possibility of real-time estimation of tumor remnants without disturbing of surgical workflow, opportunity to discover residual tumor under normal brain tissue and chipper cost. At this time there are no published results of randomized control trials comparing ultrasound and fluorescence-guided brain tumor resection.

Objective of this study is to determine whether intraoperative ultrasound guided resection of gliomas with contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging and brain metastases can achieve as high rate of gross total resection as 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence-guided surgery.

Participants of the study will be randomly operated using intraoperative ultrasound or fluorescence with 5-aminolevulinic acid. Extent of resection will be assessed in postoperative MRI by blinded radiologists

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
134 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Tumor extent of resection will be assessed by radiologists blinded for the treatment arm
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Intraoperative Sonographically Guided Versus 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Fluorescence Guided Resection of Gliomas and Brain Metastases Enhancing Contrast Agent in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: a Randomised, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 31, 2027
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 31, 2027

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Ultrasound

Intraoperative extent of tumor resection will be assessed using sonography

Device: Ultrasound guided brain tumor resection
Surgeon intraoperatively assesses extent of tumor resection using ultrasound

Active Comparator: Fluorescence

Intraoperative extent of tumor resection will be assessed using fluorescence with 5-aminolevulinic acid

Device: 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence-guided brain tumor resection
Surgeon intraoperatively assesses extent of tumor resection observing it's fluorescence in microscope

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Gross total resection (Yes or No) [within 48 hours after surgery]

    No residual contrast enhancement in postoperative T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Extent of resection (in percents) [within 48 hours after surgery]

    Extent of resection = (preoperative tumor volume - postoperative tumor volume) / preoperative tumor volume x 100

  2. Dynamics of neurological status before and after surgery [within 10 days after surgery]

    Motor function is measured in Medical Research Council scale, speech function - in Bilingual Aphasia Screening Test (Russian version), visual function - in measuring of visual fields in perimetry, cognitive disturbances - in Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale

  3. Karnofsky performance status (in percents) [within 10 days after surgery]

    Assesses patients' possibilities to self-service in Karnofsky Performance Status scale

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 79 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • single gliomas with contrast enhancement in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (presumed high-grade gliomas)

  • one or several brain metastases

  • newly diagnosed

  • Karnofsky Performance Status 60-100%

  • age 18-79 years

  • performed magnetic resonance imaging with contrast enhancement

Exclusion Criteria:
  • tumor spreading to basal ganglia, corpus callosum or brainstem

  • previously performed brain radiotherapy

  • planned supratotal tumor resection until neurophysiologically revealed eloquent areas

  • known hypersensibility to 5-aminolevulinic or to porphyrin

  • hepatic or renal insufficiency

  • porphyria

  • pregnancy

  • breast feeding

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Care Moscow Russian Federation 129090

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Care

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Alexander Dmitriev, Principal Investigator, Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Care
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05475522
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 9b
First Posted:
Jul 27, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Jul 27, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Alexander Dmitriev, Principal Investigator, Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Care
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 27, 2022