IVIG Versus Plasmapheresis in the Treatment of Guillian Barrie Syndrome Patients

Sponsor
Assiut University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05104762
Collaborator
(none)
75
1
2
6.9
10.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators address the question: whether treatment with IVIG is superior to treatment using plasmapheresis for functional recovery of patients with GBS? Recovery was quantified using: The changes in the A-Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score ) and B-overall neuropathy limitations scale as the primary outcome and the changes in Neurophysiological study 3 months after treatment as a secondary outcome.

This information will be used to evaluate which treatment is more beneficial to GBS patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: plasmapheresis device
  • Drug: Intravenous immunoglobulin
Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an inflammatory disease of the PNS and is the most common cause of acute flaccid paralysis, with an annual global incidence of approximately 1-2 per 100,000 person-years. Patients with GBS typically present with weakness and sensory signs in the legs that progress to the arms and cranial muscles, although the clinical presentation of the disease is heterogeneous and several distinct clinical variants exist. Diagnosis of GBS is based on the patient's history and neurological, electrophysiological, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examinations. Electrophysiological studies: provide evidence of peripheral nervous system (PNS) dysfunction and can distinguish between the subtypes of GBS: acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP), acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN), and acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN). Disease progression can be rapid, and most patients with GBS reach their maximum disability within 2 weeks. About 20% of patients with GBS develop respiratory failure and require mechanical ventilation. Cardiac arrhythmias and blood pressure instability can occur owing to the involvement of the autonomic nervous system. Immunomodulatory therapy should be started if patients are unable to walk independently for 10 m. Evidence on treatment efficacy in patients who can still walk independently is limited, but treatment should be considered, especially if these patients display rapidly progressive weakness or other severe symptoms such as autonomic dysfunction, bulbar failure, or respiratory insufficiency. Clinical trials have demonstrated a treatment effect for intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) when started within 2 weeks of the onset of weakness and for plasma exchange when started within 4 weeks.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
75 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
2 groups of patients with Guillian Barrie syndrome were subjected to plasmapheresis or IVIG by percentage 2:1 respectively according to availability of IVIG2 groups of patients with Guillian Barrie syndrome were subjected to plasmapheresis or IVIG by percentage 2:1 respectively according to availability of IVIG
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Triple-blind (participant and investigator, accessor) using closed envelope 2:1 was applied. 5 sessions of plasmapheresis: IVIG 0.4g IVIG/Kg /day for 5 consecutive days. The investigators didn't know what was the type of treatment that patients received and the patient didn't know that there is another line of treatment.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
IVIG Versus Plasmapheresis and Guillian Barrie Syndrome
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 2, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1 plasmapheresis

Arm 1 (plasmapheresis): This study will be conducted at Assiut University at Neurology and psychiatry department as Group 1 of patients presented with Guillian Barrie syndrome (40 patients) will be subjected to plasmapheresis after assessment of clinical state and scales including MRC, Erasmus Guillain-Barre respiratory insufficiency score and Overall neuropathy limitation scale and Neurophysiological studies. Each patient was evaluated at baseline and at Follow up assessment points (one month and 3 months)

Device: plasmapheresis device
Group 1: 40 patients of Guillian Barrie syndrome undergo plasma exchange (5 sessions)
Other Names:
  • plasma exchange device
  • Active Comparator: Arm 2: Intravenous injection of immunoglobulin

    This study will be conducted at Assiut University at Neurology and psychiatry department as Group 2 of patients presented with Guillian Barrie syndrome (20 patients) will be subjected to intravenous injection of immunoglobulin after assessment of clinical state and scales including MRC, Erasmus Guillain-Barre respiratory insufficiency score, and Overall neuropathy limitation scale and Neurophysiological studies. Each patient was evaluated at baseline and at Follow up assessment points (one month and 3 months).

    Drug: Intravenous immunoglobulin
    group 2: 20 patients undergo intravenous injection of immunoglobulin for 5 consecutive days of IVIG 0.4gm/kg/day.
    Other Names:
  • IVIG
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score ) [the points change from baseline scale and after 3 months follow up]

      Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score ) from zero ( no power ) up to 60 full power (points): sum score of muscle power in both upper limbs and lower limbs in points .

    2. Overall neuropathy limitations scale (ONLS) . [the changes in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.]

      it is modified disability sum score: sum of arm grade and leg grade limitation score; arm grade from zero point ( less limitation ) to 5 points ( most limitation ) and leg grade from zero point ( less limitation) to 7 points (more limitation)

    3. ERASMUS GBS respiratory insufficiency score EGRIS [the change in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.]

      Predict the probability of respiratory insufficiency within the first week of admission, in individual patients with Guillain-Barre. syndrome from zero to 7 points score : 0 point ( no affection ) , 7 point ( severe affection )

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Neurophysiological study: Distal latency in mill second, Nerve conduction velocities in Meter/second, and F-wave latency mill second [the change in points from baseline assessment score to 3 months follow up assessment score.]

      Neurophysiological study neurophysiological study pre- and after 3 months change of degree of affection and improvement in latency in nerve conduction m/ sec. amplitude m/v , velocity of nerve /s conduction and F-wave of both upper limbs and lower limbs

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 70 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age: 18-70 years old,

    • Onset: Recent onset of GBS through the first 2 weeks.

    • Gender: Male or Female Inclusion Criteria.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • patients with metabolic disorders, or malignancy,

    • other causes of peripheral neuropathy

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Assiut university Assiut Egypt

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Assiut University

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Eman M. Khedr, professor, Assiut University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05104762
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Guillian Barrie syndrome
    First Posted:
    Nov 3, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 3, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Eman M. Khedr, professor, Assiut University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Nov 3, 2021