Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Women Wtih Gynecological Cancer (The CONNECT Study)

Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04945187
Collaborator
The Novo Nordic Foundation (Other)
130
1
2
32.5
4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Systematic nurse-led consultations based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) will be tested among women with ovarian - and endometrial cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Nurse-led consultations based on electronic patient-reported outcomes
N/A

Detailed Description

Women with ovarian- and endometrial cancer often experiences a high disease and treatment-related physical and psychological burden. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have the potential to improve patient-clinician communication, symptom management, involvement, and quality of life. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) can facilitate appropriate and continuous symptom monitoring reported by the patients. Nurses are with their holistic approach and their specialized knowledge and experience in a prominent position to address and facilitate symptom-management in a multidisciplinary context.

The overall aim of this study is to develop a model of care for systematic nurse-led consultations based on ePRO facilitating symptom management and to investigate how these consultations can be a part of the multidisciplinary treatment regimen for women with ovarian- and endometrial cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
130 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Sequential Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
A prospective, sequential cohort study with comparisons between non-equivalent groups.A prospective, sequential cohort study with comparisons between non-equivalent groups.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Systematic Nurse-Led Consultations Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Among Women With Gynecological Cancer During Chemotherapy (The CONNECT Study)
Actual Study Start Date :
May 17, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Standard care

No intervention. This arm will continue standard clinical practice consisting of clinical assessment regarding side effects and management before each cycle of chemotherapy conducted by physicians.

Experimental: Intervention group

Intervention: This arm will be assigned to the intervention which will be nurse-led consultations based on electronic patient-reported outcomes. The patients will report ePRO weekly during chemotherapy and the answers will be used proactively in the nurse-led consultations. Nurses will conduct the clinical assessment regarding side effects and management before each cycle of chemotherapy.

Other: Nurse-led consultations based on electronic patient-reported outcomes
The patients will weekly answer electronic patient-reported outcomes during chemotherapy and the answers will be used proactive in nurse-led consultations.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Quality of life measured by EORTC QLQ C-30. [9 months; at baseline (0 months), 3, 6 and 9 months]

    EORTC QLQ C-30, a higher score indicates better quality of life (range 0-100). Differences in quality of life between the standard care and the intervention group will be tested using t-test and analysis of covariance.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Disease specific quality of life using the EORTC QLQ-OV28 Ovarian Module. [9 months; at baseline (0 months), 3, 6 and 9 months]

    Includes 28 questions.Registration of differences in the two groups.

  2. Disease specific quality of life using the EORTC QLQ-EN24 Endometrial Module [9 months; at baseline (0 months), 3, 6 and 9 months]

    Includes 24 questions. Registration of differences in the two groups.

  3. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [9 months; at baseline (0 months), 3, 6 and 9 months]

    Includes 14 questions, addressing anxiety and depressive symptoms with 7 items each in the previous 7 days.

  4. Self-efficacy for managing chronic disease 6-item scale [9 months; at baseline (0 months), 3, 6 and 9 months]

    A 6-item scale measuring patient's perceived self-efficacy on a 10 point Likert Scale.

  5. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), an objective grading of the patients symptoms. [9 months; at baseline (0 months) and every three weeks prior to chemotherapy]

    Scale 0-4, where 0 is no/nothing and 4 is severe. Registration of differences in CTCAE.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Women ≥ 18 years

  • Newly diagnosis of ovarian- or endometrial cancer

  • Scheduled to receive first-line standard chemotherapy

  • Having an active email, internet access and a device

  • Able to understand, read and speak Danish

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Severe cognitive impairments/psychiatric disorder

  • Participating in other interventional clinical trials

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark 2100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Rigshospitalet, Denmark
  • The Novo Nordic Foundation

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mille Christiansen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Helle Pappot, Professor, Clinical Oncologist, Consultant, DMSc, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04945187
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Copenhagen University Hospital
First Posted:
Jun 30, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Jun 30, 2021
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Helle Pappot, Professor, Clinical Oncologist, Consultant, DMSc, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 30, 2021