VATS ( Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy) Compared to Reinsertion of a Thoracostomy Tube for Persistent Haemothorax
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized study comparing VATS( Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy ) to reinsertion of a Thoracostomy Tube in patients with retained haemothorax. The hypothesis is that early VATS as opposed to reinsertion of a thoracostomy tube , will lead to less complications and shorter hospital stay.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Thoracostomy Tube patients selected for thoracostomy tube reinsertion after failure of drainage with first thoracostomy tube for traumatic haemothorax |
Procedure: Thoracostomy Tube reinsertion
the patient is randomized to reinsertion of a Thoracostomy Tube for retained haemothorax
|
Active Comparator: VATS patients selected for VATS after failure of first thoracostomy tube drainage of traumatic haemothorax will undergo a Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic clearance of the persistent/retained haemothorax |
Procedure: VATS ( Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy )
the patients were randomized to a Video-Assisted thoracoscopy( VATS )for retained haemothorax
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- duration of hospitalization [patients will be followed during their hospital stay, average 5-14 days]
number of days spent in hospital
Secondary Outcome Measures
- number of patients that develop empyema [2 months form initial injury]
each arm of the study will be monitored for septic complications , specifically empyema of the pleural cavity
Other Outcome Measures
- number of patients requiring thoracotomy [2 months from initial injury]
the patients that develop empyema will require a thoracotomy for clearance of the pleural cavity
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Clinical and radiological diagnosis of retained haemothorax
-
Thoracostomy tube blockage or failure to drain
Exclusion Criteria:
-
more than one attempt at thoracostomy tube drainage
-
unable to consent to trial
-
coexisting pathology requiring other interventions
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Trauma Center, Groote Schuur Hospital,University of Cape Town | Cape Town | Western Cape | South Africa | 7925 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Cape Town
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sorin Edu, MD,FCS, University of Cape Town
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 119/2013