VRBLOC: Evaluation of the Efficacy of VR on Pain and Anxiety When Performing an Ultrasound-controlled Ankle Block.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to observe or not a reduction on pain and anxiety felt by the patient when performing an ultrasound-controlled ankle block in preparation for forefoot surgery, using a virtual reality device instead of drug sedation.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Currently, in preparation for forefoot surgery, the realization of the ankle block is accompanied by drug sedation.
The investigator's randomized study aims to compare the anxiety and pain experienced by patients who have benefited from drug sedation with those of patients who benefited from the virtual reality device at the time of the realization of the ankle block.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Virtual reality The virtual reality device will consist of the virtual reality headset and headphones for full immersion. |
Device: Virtual reality
The patient will have the choice between different environments and the use of this device will remain under the control of the medical team.
The patient will wear the virtual reality device at the time of the completion of the ankle block and will remove it once the nerve puncture is complete.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Drug sedation The sedation group will benefit from drug sedation used in current practice, that is to say an association of Sufentanil, Droleptan and Propofol. |
Drug: Droleptan
Venous administration of 1.25 mg of Droleptan
Other Names:
Drug: Propofol
Venous administration of 20 mg of Propofol
Other Names:
Drug: Sufentanyl
Venous administration of 5 μg of Sufentanyl.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Digital visual scale to assess pain of patients during the treatment [5 min after the first nerve punction]
Numeric scale numbered from 0 to 10. 0: no pain 10 : worst possible pain
- Digital visual scale to assess anxiety of patients during the treatment [5 min after the first nerve punction]
Numeric scale numbered from 0 to 10. 0: no anxiety 10 : worst possible anxiety
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Patient satisfaction questionnaire [5 min after the last nerve punction]
Concerns all patients Numeric scale numbered from 0 to 10. 0: unsatisfied 10 : very satisfied
- Patient comfort assessment questionnaire [5 min after the last nerve punction]
Concerns all patients. This is a question to determine their comfort levels during the experiment. Numeric scale numbered from 1 to 5. : very comfortable : comfortable : less comfortable : uncomfortable : very uncomfortable
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patient with medical insurance
-
Major patient requiring a Hallux Valgus surgery
-
Patient who received information about study and signes a consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Minor patient
-
Patient participating in another interventional study
-
Patient refusing to sign the consent form
-
Patient for whom it is impossible to give informed information
-
Patient who had previously undergone forefoot surgery under locoregional anesthesia
-
Patient with poor skin condition or infection at puncture sites
-
Patient refusing locoregional anesthesia
-
Patient under the protection of justice, under curatorship or under tutorship
-
Patient undergoing anxiolytic or antidepressant treatment
-
Photosensitive epileptic patient
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Clinique Saint Jean | Montpellier | France | 34090 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Clinique Saint Jean, France
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thomas PILLANT, MD, Clinique Saint Jean, Montpellier
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Burt DE. Virtual reality in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Oct;75(4):472-80. Review.
- Furman E, Jasinevicius TR, Bissada NF, Victoroff KZ, Skillicorn R, Buchner M. Virtual reality distraction for pain control during periodontal scaling and root planing procedures. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Dec;140(12):1508-16.
- Konstantatos AH, Angliss M, Costello V, Cleland H, Stafrace S. Predicting the effectiveness of virtual reality relaxation on pain and anxiety when added to PCA morphine in patients having burns dressings changes. Burns. 2009 Jun;35(4):491-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.08.017. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
- Mosso JL, Gorini A, De La Cerda G, Obrador T, Almazan A, Mosso D, Nieto JJ, Riva G. Virtual reality on mobile phones to reduce anxiety in outpatient surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;142:195-200.
- Nilsson S, Finnström B, Kokinsky E, Enskär K. The use of Virtual Reality for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents in a paediatric oncology unit. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Apr;13(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
- Patterson DR, Jensen MP, Wiechman SA, Sharar SR. Virtual reality hypnosis for pain associated with recovery from physical trauma. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2010 Jul;58(3):288-300. doi: 10.1080/00207141003760595.
- Wright JL, Hoffman HG, Sweet RM. Virtual reality as an adjunctive pain control during transurethral microwave thermotherapy. Urology. 2005 Dec;66(6):1320.
- LOCAL2017-TP02