SHoRT: Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of 6 Versus 3 Steps for Hand Hygiene
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim is to compare the effectiveness of the 6 step hand rub technique versus 3 step hand rub technique in hand coverage and in reducing bacterial contamination on the hands of healthcare workers in practice.
Research questions
-
What is the effectiveness of the 6 step technique in hand coverage compared to the 3 step technique?
-
What are the most frequently missed sites in hand surface coverage using 6 steps compared to 3 steps?
-
What is the reduction in bacterial contamination of the hand with the 6 step compared to the 3 step technique?
-
Does site missed or coverage relate to bacterial load?
-
What is the time taken for 6 step technique versus 3 step technique?
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The 6 step for decontamination of healthcare workers hand is recommended by the World Health Organization but the 3 step technique is easy to perform and has been shown by some studies to be effective. Compliance with the 6 step technique is not optimum. If the 3 step was more as or more effective than the 6 step compliance with it could be compared with that for the 6 step. No randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of these two techniques using alcohol based hand rub has been conducted.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 6 step hand hygiene technique Hand decontamination with alcohol hand rub using the World Health Organisations 6 step technique |
Other: 6 step technique
Hand decontamination with alcohol hand rub using the World Health Organizations 6 step technique
Other Names:
|
Experimental: 3 step hand hygiene technique Hand decontamination with alcohol hand rub using the 3 step technique |
Other: 3 step technique
Hand decontamination with alcohol hand rub using the 3 step technique
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Microbial load on dominant hand [up to 5 min]
A glove juice technique will be used to assess the microbial load on the dominant hand of healthcare workers following use of alcohol hand rub after a clinical procedure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Hand coverage [up to 5 min]
Ultra violet box will be used to assess hand coverage of the hands of healthcare workers following use of alcohol hand rub.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Medical and nursing staff performing a clinical procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
-
A procedure requiring use of gloves
-
A self declared active skin condition
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Western Infirmary | Glasgow | United Kingdom | G11 6NT |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Glasgow Caledonian University
- University of Strathclyde
- University of East Anglia
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jacqui Reilly, PhD, Glasgow Caledonian University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 12-170
- SIRN04